COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTHOUSE — A (MALE) nurse at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago is accused of fondling a quadriplegic U.S. Army veteran against his will, prosecutors said Thursday
Why did you post it in this forum? Sounds like a criminal matter. I hope he gets hit to the fullest extent of the law. Predators like that should never be allowed in that kind of position again.
Judging from who posted this, I'm guessing that either the point is that ALL gays are predators, that Obama is somehow to blame, or a combination of the two (Obama is allowing funding for gay nurses to fondle at will because he wants to bring about Sharia law?)
Judging from who posted this, I'm guessing that either the point is that ALL gays are predators, that Obama is somehow to blame, or a combination of the two (Obama is allowing funding for gay nurses to fondle at will because he wants to bring about Sharia law?)
Quote me where I said such a thing. You're attacking me personally and contributing nothing to this thread
I would continue the conversation but you'll just run to the mods so it's pointless
Quote me where I said such a thing. You're attacking me personally and contributing nothing to this thread
I would continue the conversation but you'll just run to the mods so it's pointless
Quote me where I said such a thing. You're attacking me personally and contributing nothing to this thread
I would continue the conversation but you'll just run to the mods so it's pointless
Quote me where I said such a thing. You're attacking me personally and contributing nothing to this thread
I would continue the conversation but you'll just run to the mods so it's pointless
Quote me where I said such a thing. You're attacking me personally and contributing nothing to this thread
I would continue the conversation but you'll just run to the mods so it's pointless
Then what is your point? You didn't make any argument in the OP, but you did highlight that it was a male nurse. So is your point that the nurse is male, or are you just playing encyclopedia?
You're being disingenuous. You highlighted "Male" in your OP so I think your intent is pretty obvious. In fact, you added it as if it was in the quote from the article but it wasn't. If the nurse or victim had been female, would you have started this thread?
Make an argument about what?
What are you trying to argue? I didn't highlight anything. That's the story. The guy is a male nurse.
What are throwing a temper tantrum over? :lol:
If the story was a female nurse, sure
Lot of hand wringing in this thread. Nobody seems to want to talk about the story.
Why?
Including you. You've said nothing about the story, or why you thought it worthy of posting.
Geez, even X isn't defending you from me. Usually when he sees where I am, he goes the exact opposite way.
Why then, did you insert "male" and make it all Caps and in red?
You don't think a quadriplegic army vet fondled By a male nurse is worth talking about?
You don't think a quadriplegic army vet fondled By a male nurse is worth talking about?
This is why most see you as a disingenuous, homophobic moron.
You've got an agenda here and yet you won't admit it.
You've OBVIOUSLY tried to make something more here. :roll:
You're making a (not so subtle) statement regarding homosexuality.
Just come out and say it.
You don't think a quadriplegic army vet fondled By a male nurse is worth talking about?
This is a debate site and you posted the story in a debate topic section. That means that threads should include something to debate not to simply "talk about".
Why do we have to debate everything?
We discuss issues all the time
Debate politics. Maybe you missed that part.
We discuss issues within a certain topic and from a starting point. Not simply from a random article that is posted in the wrong section, unless the OP actually directs the article toward a specific item that deals with the section the article is placed in. Nothing about the article itself suggests at all that it should be in the Sex/Sexuality section rather than the Law/Order section of this forum. So, for it to be here and get discussion rather than being considered trolling, the OP needs to direct the conversation from the start in a direction that links the article to something debatable dealing with sex or sexuality, which was not done.
All I've seen in this thread is people making accusations and personal attacks
What about the article do you want to discuss/debate? Are you claiming the nurse is female? What
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?