- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 10,032
- Reaction score
- 4,966
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
How is that different from libertarianism?
There are differences. I shall name 4.
On the matter of taxation: while libertarians don't see taxation as a good thing, national liberals don't have a problem with taxes. You can tax us as long as we see a return on our investment. That's why national liberals were the first to implement taxes that go specifically to one department. like taxes that go for healthcare or for education or such. At least where I'm at.
On the matter of government intervention in the individuals life: I do think that government intervention in the individuals' life should be greater than just safeguarding his rights and civic liberties. Sure, that is a good idea and a main priority, but also it should provide the means of recovery and advancement. For this purpose there should be programs that provide free public education, universal healthcare, career suggestion programs, etc, all organized and run by the state to which any citizen can have access to.
On the matter of spending: National liberals don't see deficit spending as something horrible. Deficit spending is good as long as it isn't wasteful. Deficit spending in order to fund better education or for the purpose of creating stimulus packages with grants for small businesses is a good idea. Or basically anything that serves the national interest.
The final one is on the matter of state ownership. National liberals don't mind the fact that the state owns/has majority/has some shares in companies that provide utility services or are of national interest (rafineries, mining companies, etc). While private ownership is the key to innovation and prosperity, and capitalism works, the state shouldn't just be into providing state services as traditionally thought of, but also have a stake in the good provision of consumer services.