Poletopole
New member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2016
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
President Obama says we got bin Laden. I have a question for the president: Mr. President, can you prove the United States Government killed Osama bin Laden? Since no proof of any kind has ever been put forward that the United States Government killed bin Laden, I would say that now would be a good time for you to clear up this matter by presenting the proof, that surely you have, as you wouldn't want to be saying that the government killed bin Laden without such proof, so please Mr. President, go on national television and present this proof. So by presenting such proof, Mr. President, we can be completely satisfied that bin Laden is dead, and not by natural causes. But just in case you do not have such proof, you might want to ask those who were given the task of killing bin Laden why they did not present such proof to you, Mr. President. I mean, surely that would be one of the most important duties of those given the task of killing Osama bin Laden would be to present to the President of the United States of America such proof that they "got" bin Laden. Also the rest of the world, I'm sure, would like to see such proof, after all we Americans would not want to appear to do things "half baked" as the saying goes, by not proving that we "got" bin Laden. It is really not good enough, now is it, just to come back and say "we got'em", now surely we can do better than that, I mean, such a highly organized forces as these men who were sent there to kill bin Laden would be capable of getting the evidence to prove that they got bin Laden, instead of presenting a fake photo of the so-called dead bin Laden, and then say they have the photos, but think they will burn them! For crying out loud, who knows, maybe this evil person is still out there plotting all kinds of mayhem against the United States people, we the American people need to know! So thank you, thank you, Mr. President for gathering to gather all this proof you need to present to the American people that indeed the U.S. Government really really did kill Osama bin Laden, and you Mr. President of this great country, surely will.
Moderator's Warning: |
Let's see.......there's the fact that the SEALS successfully launched a raid on the compound, killed Bin Laden and got out. There's the fact that AQ and the Taliban vowed to avenge his death, something they'd hardly do if he was still alive. After all, Bin Laden would have loved to gloat that the "infidels" tried to kill him and failed. There's the personal reports and documentation captured during the raid.
They didn't realease the photos taken of OBL after the fact because that would have sparked attacks on Americans abroad in Miidle Eastern countries. They are also graphic in nature. Being shot in the head tends to do that.
If your going to come up with a bull**** accusation, at least come up with a plausible bull**** accusation
That is no evidence OBL was killed by the SEALs.No body, no video nor are there any photos. They say so they did it and we are supposed to take their word for it? I got a bridge and some ocean front property in Arizona to sell you if you take the word of anyone with out any physical evidence.
The graphic nature of photos never stopped anyone from releasing photos of dead terrorists before and the "it would incite other terrorist if we had evidence" sounds like a crock of ****. When Saddam was executed we got a video, When his sons were killed we got photos and its practically been the same with every other high profile terrorist. Plus the "we don't want to prove we killed OBL because it would incite other terrorists" is contradicted by your claim that AQ and the Taliban vowed revenge, meaning they would act either way.
What is bull **** is the fact there is not video or photographic evidence of OBL's death and we are supposed to take the word of a government that in known for constantly lying.
Oh, of course. The SEALs should have paused in the middle of their mission to post their photos of Osama's destroyed face to the Internet. Or put it on YouTube. After all, it's not like they were on a top secret operation and Pakistani troops were racing towards the site or anything, right?
I suppose you don't believe Hitler died then, either.
There were pictures---they simply weren't released to the public. You don't like that? Tough ****.
The situation with Saddam and the other terrorists were different. It wasn't a commando raid that got Saddam---he'd already been captured. They didn't have to bug out. Just because you "got used" to have executions in glorious technicolor style doesn't mean that's the way it always is going to be.
It's immature to think otherwise.
President Obama says we got bin Laden. I have a question for the president: Mr. President, can you prove the United States Government killed Osama bin Laden? Since no proof of any kind has ever been put forward that the United States Government killed bin Laden, I would say that now would be a good time for you to clear up this matter by presenting the proof, that surely you have, as you wouldn't want to be saying that the government killed bin Laden without such proof, so please Mr. President, go on national television and present this proof. So by presenting such proof, Mr. President, we can be completely satisfied that bin Laden is dead, and not by natural causes. But just in case you do not have such proof, you might want to ask those who were given the task of killing bin Laden why they did not present such proof to you, Mr. President. I mean, surely that would be one of the most important duties of those given the task of killing Osama bin Laden would be to present to the President of the United States of America such proof that they "got" bin Laden. Also the rest of the world, I'm sure, would like to see such proof, after all we Americans would not want to appear to do things "half baked" as the saying goes, by not proving that we "got" bin Laden. It is really not good enough, now is it, just to come back and say "we got'em", now surely we can do better than that, I mean, such a highly organized forces as these men who were sent there to kill bin Laden would be capable of getting the evidence to prove that they got bin Laden, instead of presenting a fake photo of the so-called dead bin Laden, and then say they have the photos, but think they will burn them! For crying out loud, who knows, maybe this evil person is still out there plotting all kinds of mayhem against the United States people, we the American people need to know! So thank you, thank you, Mr. President for gathering to gather all this proof you need to present to the American people that indeed the U.S. Government really really did kill Osama bin Laden, and you Mr. President of this great country, surely will.
Didn't they claim to give OBL a burial at sea? So the whole time constraint issue is non issue,
Yes, they did give him a burial at sea. The time constraint still exists, however.
Again seeing how Saddam's hanging was released,so were the morgue photos of Saddam's sons as well as the photos of every other dead terrorist the issue of a photo being too gruesome is irrelevant. If you were on a jury and someone said they saw so and so kill someone and there is no body and no video or photographic evidence, I do not think you would convict that person of murder.Not to mention that you might want to look at pictures of a guy who got shot in the head over breakfast or a meal in general, but most people don't.
If they had time to pack his body up, put him on a boat/ship and dump him out in sea then they most definitely had plenty of time to take pictures and video. Cameras are no longer bulky,cumbersome and and a pain in the ass to use.Heck a lot of cell phones have the ability to take video and still images.
Again seeing how Saddam's hanging was released,so were the morgue photos of Saddam's sons as well as the photos of every other dead terrorist the issue of a photo being too gruesome is irrelevant. If you were on a jury and someone said they saw so and so kill someone and there is no body and no video or photographic evidence, I do not think you would convict that person of murder.
Let's see your proof that Osama bin Laden isn't dead.
:lol:
My guess is that you don't have any.
And as the OP has pointed out, the government cannot prove OBL was taken out at Abbottabad just like it cannot prove that a BUK missile took out MH17, just like William Jefferson Clinton could not prove he did not have sex with that woman.
Bin Laden died in December 2001. The Legend Of Abbottabad was contrived to distract the public and media from what Obama was doing with Manning.
And as the OP has pointed out, the government cannot prove OBL was taken out at Abbottabad just like it cannot prove that a BUK missile took out MH17, just like William Jefferson Clinton could not prove he did not have sex with that woman.
Bin Laden died in December 2001. The Legend Of Abbottabad was contrived to distract the public and media from what Obama was doing with Manning.
What is bull **** is the fact there is not video or photographic evidence of OBL's death and we are supposed to take the word of a government that in known for constantly lying.
Bin Laden died in December 2001. .
The proof is that those Navy SEALS are now dead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?