• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Osama bin Laden's Death: Wheres The Proof?

To the trained eye, much can be learned from an accident scene like the one at Abbottabad. One can learn what might have happened, and/or what did most certainly NOT happen.

Now he's claiming to be an accident investigator as well as a multi-decade helicopter pilot (in addition to his previous claims of jet aircraft expertise)
 
Now he's claiming to be an accident investigator as well as a multi-decade helicopter pilot (in addition to his previous claims of jet aircraft expertise)

His real name is Clark Kent
 
You're the one claiming expertise over tail rotor aerodynamics and have yet to answer a single question I've posed on that subject.

Will that pictured tail rotor produce any amount of thrust?

We can only speculate, Professor, because there is no flight data available. There are not even pictures available.

Perhaps you can calculate an estimate for the amount of thrust it would produce, Professor? :lol:
 
We can only speculate, Professor, because there is no flight data available. There are not even pictures available.

Perhaps you can calculate an estimate for the amount of thrust it would produce, Professor? :lol:

You are the one claiming the helicopter is a fake and a 5 bladed tail rotor is aerodynamically impossible so the BOP is on you.

I'm not worried about you actually meeting your BOP anytime soon,... or ever. We can stick a fork in this subject. You're wrong, you have no intention of trying to prove you are right - because you aren't - preferring to keep the discussion circling endlessly over baseless claims you have no intention of backing up - because you can't.

End of discussion of this particular matter.
 
We can only speculate, Professor, because there is no flight data available. There are not even pictures available.

Perhaps you can calculate an estimate for the amount of thrust it would produce, Professor? :lol:

The question was "any amount of thrust."

The fact that you didn't answer "of course" proves to me you've never once sat in a helicopter. Anyone who knows the least bit about aerodynamics can tell you any rotating blade will produce some thrust.

Or anyone who has a ceiling fan in their home.

Your claim of "no pictures available" is bizarre because you started this entire discussion based on a picture of rotor blades that you claim "wouldn't work." So, now there aren't pictures? That's interesting.
 
The question was "any amount of thrust."

The fact that you didn't answer "of course" proves to me you've never once sat in a helicopter. Anyone who knows the least bit about aerodynamics can tell you any rotating blade will produce some thrust.

Or anyone who has a ceiling fan in their home.

Your claim of "no pictures available" is bizarre because you started this entire discussion based on a picture of rotor blades that you claim "wouldn't work." So, now there aren't pictures? That's interesting.

He thinks the rotor assembly in question is a Fenestron - which it in absolutely no way resembles. Of all of Henry's idiotic claims - and there are many - this may be the most idiotic from a guy who boasts experiences and expertise in matters of aviation.
 
He thinks the rotor assembly in question is a Fenestron - which it in absolutely no way resembles. Of all of Henry's idiotic claims - and there are many - this may be the most idiotic from a guy who boasts experiences and expertise in matters of aviation.

Sure, sure. A fenestron without the shroud that defines the concept.

Like a ductless turbofan!
 
The question was "any amount of thrust."

The fact that you didn't answer "of course" proves to me you've never once sat in a helicopter. Anyone who knows the least bit about aerodynamics can tell you any rotating blade will produce some thrust.

Or anyone who has a ceiling fan in their home.

Your claim of "no pictures available" is bizarre because you started this entire discussion based on a picture of rotor blades that you claim "wouldn't work." So, now there aren't pictures? That's interesting.

Copy all, Ceiling Fan Deuce. :lamo
 
Copy all, Ceiling Fan Deuce. :lamo

Every time he has no rebuttal (which is often), he just does this.

I'm glad you agree now that the blades can produce thrust, as any asymmetrical or angled piece of solid material will do so.

So where are your goalposts going next?
 
Back
Top Bottom