- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,990
- Reaction score
- 60,556
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Stop that. If you start using logic and start dealing in reality then people who can't actually argue anything can't use over the top hyperbolic stereotypes such as suggesting that conservatives are anarchists and that if you dislike excessive federal government bloating and redistribution programs you must obviously believe that every portion of government and its purposes must cease to exist entirely.
More like corporations outsourcing manufacturing jobs to India and China, which helps their bottom line at the expense of the American economy.
So yes, it's sort of like sending money to Mexico, only on an exponentially greater scale. Not to mention those undocumented immigrants you speak so contemptuously of are contributing more to our economy than they are taking away.
Frankly I don't care what Adam Smith would say because I don't blindly follow irrelevant dogmas established 300 years ago.
Modern global economics would have boggled Smith's mind.
A more relevant question might be what would John Maynard Keynes have to say?
Better those companies fail than send their jobs to competing economies. They might have the right to outsource, but we as Americans also have the right to protect our economy.
Well, that says a lot.And you would lose.
Hate filled?Some idiot puts out his hate-filled reactionary patisan philosophy in giant letters, in the form of a deliberate insult, to many millions of people in full public view of literally thousands of people and got a very negative response for dong so. That's what sometimes happens when you do stupid stuff.
What? A point of view isn't permitted?
Politic discourse?
You know thousand had a negative view?
If so, are we not allowed to confront people with the political choices they make?
What about the people that find it refreshing and funny?
Can we not have a laugh and enjoy the fact it might get some people thinking about what it means?
Do you believe in the 1st Amendment? You do know it was to preserve political discourse?
I thought leftists were tolerant?
Obviously questioning the course of the country has to be left to the NY Times, WaPO, TIME, Newsweek, CNN, MSNBC, The Old Three, and the Libs they support.
I guess the following only applies to the left.
We're sorry. We'll crawl back under our rocks.
.
Wrong attribution in post #24Quote Originally Posted by The Uncola View Post
And you would lose.
Some idiot puts out his hate-filled reactionary patisan philosophy in giant letters, in the form of a deliberate insult, to many millions of people in full public view of literally thousands of people and got a very negative response for dong so. That's what sometimes happens when you do stupid stuff.
"Hate-filled reactionary partisan philosophy"? I bet you're a fan of hate crimes legislation, aren't you? And hate = views that criticize your own.
Correction above.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-sign-u-s-71-draws-fire-3.html#post1058816137
"Hate-filled reactionary partisan philosophy"? I bet you're a fan of hate crimes legislation, aren't you? And hate = views that criticize your own.
Nope, not particularly hung up pro or con on "hate crime legislation." Assume much?
The guy asked for trouble and he got it. Tends to happen to people who insist on showing their ass in public.
Well, that says a lot.
Hate filled?
What? A point of view isn't permitted?
Politic discourse?
You know thousand had a negative view?
If so, are we not allowed to confront people with the political choices they make?
What about the people that find it refreshing and funny?
Can we not have a laugh and enjoy the fact it might get some people thinking about what it means?
Do you believe in the 1st Amendment? You do know it was to preserve political discourse?
I thought leftists were tolerant?
Obviously questioning the course of the country has to be left to the NY Times, WaPO, TIME, Newsweek, CNN, MSNBC, The Old Three, and the Libs they support.
I guess the following only applies to the left.
We're sorry. We'll crawl back under our rocks.
.
Where did I say any of the that crap? If you're just gonna make **** up, you don't need my help to find stuff to whine about. That dipstick can say anything he wants, just don't be surprised when it pisses somebody else off when he insults them and they retaliate. That's called reality, sorry that offends you.
Ahhh gee...
... that's too bad..
Couldn't of happened to a nicer reactionary partisan tool.
And you would lose.
Some idiot puts out his hate-filled reactionary patisan philosophy in giant letters, in the form of a deliberate insult, to many millions of people in full public view of literally thousands of people and got a very negative response for dong so. That's what sometimes happens when you do stupid stuff.
The guy asked for trouble and he got it. Tends to happen to people who insist on showing their ass in public.
That dipstick can say anything he wants, just don't be surprised when it pisses somebody else off when he insults them and they retaliate. That's called reality, sorry that offends you.
More like corporations outsourcing manufacturing jobs to India and China, which helps their bottom line at the expense of the American economy. So yes, it's sort of like sending money to Mexico, only on an exponentially greater scale. Not to mention those undocumented immigrants you speak so contemptuously of are contributing more to our economy than they are taking away.
... have, not reinvesting the money they earn back into the U.S. economy because they either buy from hispanic owned shops...
Which hire exclusively illegal immigrants
often truebecause they send their money back to Mexico
Ive heard thats likely false, also I dont know of any businesses that are not taxed.and not paying taxes
:shrug: not a good situation, yeah.While accepting free healthcare and public school for their children who they use as anchor babies, then ya they contribute a whole heck of a lot.
Amen to that. If Republicans had understood the true meaning of fiscal conservatism during the Bush years, the economy wouldn't be in the mess it's in right now.
Where did I say any of the that crap? If you're just gonna make **** up, you don't need my help to find stuff to whine about. That dipstick can say anything he wants, just don't be surprised when it pisses somebody else off when he insults them and they retaliate. That's called reality, sorry that offends you.
I quoted you accurately and based on this post of yours, my questions were pertinent.Some idiot puts out his hate-filled reactionary patisan philosophy in giant letters, in the form of a deliberate insult, to many millions of people in full public view of literally thousands of people and got a very negative response for dong so. That's what sometimes happens when you do stupid stuff.
Care to explain this? Is this like illegals sending money home to Mexico?
Jungerman said he didn’t mean to direct his sign at local Democrats. Many of those are old-fashioned Harry Truman Democrats, he said.
He's wrong about everything, of course-- the only parasites we should be concernced about are multinational corporations siphoning this country's money like leeches-- but it's a shame some hoodlums vandalized his property.
You mean cats like George Soros? You ready see his ass get kicked out of the country?
That's quite a non sequitur to take from what I said. I wouldn't want to see anyone "kicked out of the country" but I'd love to see some legislation that required Soros and every other businessman to keep the jobs they create in the USA if they want to do business here.
Well, he sorta was, but Obama fixed that with the drilling moratorium.
I'm not just talking about jobs created by oil, as important as those might be, all jobs that are outsourced overseas hurt the economy. Start with bringing back manufacturing jobs from China and IT jobs from India before you go into histrionics about deepwater drilling lost to Brazil.
...all jobs that are outsourced overseas hurt the economy.
Start with bringing back manufacturing jobs from China...
...and IT jobs from India...
Obama wants more tax dollars? He should create a more business friendly environment. Until then, the job market in the US won't improve.
This simply isn't true. Outsourcing hurts the people who lose their jobs but benefits the consumer with lower prices. In the end, it's a net positive for the economy.
Never going to happen. Not unless we lower taxes and relax our labor laws.
These are very single-minded ways of looking at the issue. To say that outsourcing benefits consumers by providing lower prices ignores the fact that it sends jobs away from this economy. What good are lower prices without jobs? We buy the goods with our money that then goes overseas and becomes their money, slowly draining our economy. It's overall hurting our economy to lose manufacturing jobs, just look at Detroit, to claim it's a net positive is disingenuous.
OR we could enforce more stringent restriction on companies who decide to take advantage of cheap overseas labor by refusing to allow the import of overseas manufactured goods. There is more than one way to skin a cat, and instead of relaxing laws that protect workers we should force the multinationals to provide their jobs in the economy they expect to sell their goods and services to. I know it's hard for some koolaid drinking conservatives to believe but the so-called free makert is not the best decision-maker, and government can actually be a force for good if it works to protect our economy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?