Michael Avenatti appears to blame Jacob Wohl for domestic violence arrest

[Mason66]

Exactly. If Wohl didn't have a history of this, it might be different. Avenatti seems like he's a scrapper. Scrappers don't always have the ability to hold their tempers. But with this being Wohl? Makes me wonder. Just too suspicious.

Was Wohl the woman that filed the complaint against Avenetti?

This was a domestic violence charge so Avenetti has to have some kind of relationship with this woman.

If she was a random person, it would be assault and battery.

Please explain how somebody from the outside could cause this.

 

[Superfly]

Was Wohl the woman that filed the complaint against Avenetti?

This was a domestic violence charge so Avenetti has to have some kind of relationship with this woman.

If she was a random person, it would be assault and battery.

Please explain how somebody from the outside could cause this.

The same way someone from the outside could accuse Mueller of sexual misconduct. Anybody can be paid off.

Not saying that's what happened. Just saying this doesn't pass the smell test. Not with it being tied to Wohl.

 

[Mason66]

The same way someone from the outside could accuse Mueller of sexual misconduct. Anybody can be paid off.

Not saying that's what happened. Just saying this doesn't pass the smell test. Not with it being tied to Wohl.

Are you saying the police are in on this somehow?

They would have to be, right?

As I said above, domestic violence is charged when the two people know each other.

There are witnesses to this event. Are they in on it as well?

 

[Saladin4]

Was Wohl the woman that filed the complaint against Avenetti?

This was a domestic violence charge so Avenetti has to have some kind of relationship with this woman.

If she was a random person, it would be assault and battery.

Please explain how somebody from the outside could cause this.

Where's the woman?...How much was she paid?

 

[Mason66]

Where's the woman?...How much was she paid?

You don't have to believe it. That is your prerogative.

Since you seem to be so smart, why did the police arrest Avenetti if there was no woman that made the complaint?

Is the police force in on this conspiracy you seem to have made up in your head?

 

[Saladin4]

You don't have to believe it. That is your prerogative.

Since you seem to be so smart, why did the police arrest Avenetti if there was no woman that made the complaint?

Is the police force in on this conspiracy you seem to have made up in your head?

I'm guessing the charges will be dropped...Still kudos to the Right Wing trolls that set this up.....They'll need an accuser to step forward...With evidence....For any conviction

 

[tres borrachos]

While not totally unbelievable, it is also fairly believable that someone of Avantti's personality type would have a nasty temper and get violent.

Absolutely. He rivals Donald Trump for the world's most obnoxious and unlikeable human being.

 

[Oborosen]

Nope Not believing little trollish wannabe twinks who has already been shown how much a fool he is. By literally everyone in the political and media worlds.

...citations.. please?

 

[Oborosen]

Doesn't surprise me. The guy paints himself as some sort of hero of the left but in the end he's a sleazy porn star lawyer. Let's see how it plays out.

And to think, this joker has aspirations of running for president... the horror if that were to come to pass.

 

[Oborosen]

Really looking forward to the disclosure of the evidence since the government, to this point, has refused to disclose what they have. Last I had heard, referenced this summer, was that they had 1TB of online material but couldn't turn it over because they hadn't translated it yet.

Most of us are thinking that it involves that Fuzzy Bear group, or what people believe is the Fuzzy Bear group.

At this point, I have no idea. I'm just waiting to see how fast this candle burns.

 

[apdst]

The same way someone from the outside could accuse Mueller of sexual misconduct. Anybody can be paid off.

Not saying that's what happened. Just saying this doesn't pass the smell test. Not with it being tied to Wohl.

She was paid to let Avenatti beat the **** out of her?

 

[apdst]

You don't have to believe it. That is your prerogative.

Since you seem to be so smart, why did the police arrest Avenetti if there was no woman that made the complaint?

Is the police force in on this conspiracy you seem to have made up in your head?

Yes, because all cops are racists.

 

[Mason66]

Yes, because all cops are racists.

Does this have anything to do with race?

I thought this was political, to discredit the angelic Avenetti.

 

[apdst]

Does this have anything to do with race?

I thought this was political, to discredit the angelic Avenetti.

You missed the sarcasm.

 

[Roadvirus]

Color me (not) surprised... the Creepy Porn Lawyer (ultimately) blames Trump...

:lamo

"It's Trump's fault i hit that woman! He sent me a telepathic message: Hit the woman....hit the woman...!"

 

[uptower]

And to think, this joker has aspirations of running for president... the horror if that were to come to pass.

I doubt he'd garner enough followers to justify a primary run. There aren't that many people in the Valley.

 

[Joecool44]

As always though, he gets to defend himself and has the presumption of innocence.

During the Kavanaugh hearings, weren't people screaming that women must be believed? #metoo

:roll:

 

[Oborosen]

I doubt he'd garner enough followers to justify a primary run. There aren't that many people in the Valley.

But how many people are willing to vote for someone, just to stick it to Trump?

 

[Hawkeye10]

But how many people are willing to vote for someone, just to stick it to Trump?

So many voted for Trump in the first place to stick it to the Elite....to "Send a Message"......which gets mislabeled by the liars as a cult of personality.

It was never about Trump, it was about the message.

 

[Oborosen]

So many voted for Trump in the first place to stick it to the Elite....to "Send a Message"......which gets mislabeled by the liars as a cult of personality.

It was never about Trump, it was about the message.

On that I do agree, but this time around I believe that the revolting, hate mob of the left. Will actually get off their fat asses this time and vote, seeing as they can't actually count on their slaves to do it for them this time.

 

[Hawkeye10]

On that I do agree, but this time around I believe that the revolting, hate mob of the left. Will actually get off their fat asses this time and vote, seeing as they can't actually count on their slaves to do it for them this time.

Trump is a one term President, as he should know. The Failed Intelligentsia control the media and because the University has failed the people are generally stupid now.

Truth Loses.

 

[Oborosen]

Trump is a one term President, as he should know. The Failed Intelligentsia control the media and because the University has failed the people are generally stupid now.

Truth Loses.

Sadly that seems to be the point in this day and age. Though I must say the thought of him getting a second term was quite interesting. Just to see the amount of havoc it would play with the left and I would actually like for the economy to stay on a nice upturn.

 

[uptower]

But how many people are willing to vote for someone, just to stick it to Trump?

I don't think they want to 'stick it to him'. They want him gone because they think he's hurting the country.

A good lot of Trump's voters however really did want to stick it to someone, depending who they are: to the establishment, to Washington, to the dems, Europe, to women, minorities and yes, his predecessor. Some were even liberal Bernies supporters who wanted to stick it to Clinton. The rest were republicans who had nobody else to vote for. But it was mostly about 'sticking it' to the 'libtards'. That's their schtick.

But the people who voted against Trump in this election and who will vote against him in the next one are looking most of all for relief, for protection, not catharsis. For that reason they'll be able to find better candidates than a wannabe rabble-rouser.

And just look at the talk. The only people talking about an Avenatti run (except the egotist himself) are Republicans, or rather hardcore Trump supporters. They want him to run because in the fantasy football version of politics they play he'd be a beatable opponent. They're probably right. Trump could beat Avenatti because not enough people would get behind Avenatti - which is exactly why he wouldn't survive the primaries let alone go up against Trump.

Actual news sources as well as pundits and op-eds though, they're talking about O'Rourke, Booker, Harris and Sanders again; populists, technocrats, experienced politicians, not Avenatti.

The guy doesn't have a shot.

 

[Bum]

But how many people are willing to vote for someone, just to stick it to Trump?

To be fair, look at how many voted for Trump to stick it to the D.C. status quo....:shrug:

 

[Oborosen]

I don't think they want to 'stick it to him'. They want him gone because they think he's hurting the country.

A good lot of Trump's voters however really did want to stick it to someone, depending who they are: to the establishment, to Washington, to the dems, Europe, to women, minorities and yes, his predecessor. Some were even liberal Bernies supporters who wanted to stick it to Clinton. The rest were republicans who had nobody else to vote for. But it was mostly about 'sticking it' to the 'libtards'. That's their schtick.

But the people who voted against Trump in this election and who will vote against him in the next one are looking most of all for relief, for protection, not catharsis. For that reason they'll be able to find better candidates than a wannabe rabble-rouser.

And just look at the talk. The only people talking about an Avenatti run (except the egotist himself) are Republicans, or rather hardcore Trump supporters. They want him to run because in the fantasy football version of politics they play he'd be a beatable opponent. They're probably right. Trump could beat Avenatti because not enough people would get behind Avenatti - which is exactly why he wouldn't survive the primaries let alone go up against Trump.

Actual news sources as well as pundits and op-eds though, they're talking about O'Rourke, Booker, Harris and Sanders again; populists, technocrats, experienced politicians, not Avenatti.

The guy doesn't have a shot.

I know he doesn't have a shot, but if I'm going to be frank. The fact that he may try still worries me.
I jumped the Democrat ship halfway through 2016, after years of serving it faithfully. Every day I look back and I see my once beloved party just slide further and further into near social destitution.

I worry that if he places his foot on that political stage and digs at least one toe into the soil, that there in that singular moment. I will witness the final breath of my former party and they will firmly be past the point of no return.