• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Law Are For the Little People

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,767
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
LawforLittlePeople.JPG

“Look, here are Comey’s remarks. The material needed to attack Hillary Clinton is all there. A prosecution would be very controversial AND it would cause many people to step back and allow it to take its course — with due process and the presumption of innocence. That route is closed off, but you have the evidence in front of you and can clearly see what she did.”

Althouse: I know you've had a rough day.



And in what is probably a common reaction:

"I am REALLLLY close to casting an [F*** You] vote for Trump. That's how bad things are." - Tweet by @neontaster


The Day the Rule of Law Died

And so once again the leading crime family in America skates, thumbing its nose at the rule of law as an earnest but politically clueless FBI director stands before the nation to repeat the well-worn Clinton mantra of "insufficient evidence," and to attribute to Hillary another shopworn cliche that the Clintons habitually use in their defense: sloppiness.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/07/05/the-day-the-rule-of-law-died/


There will come a day when Democrats will wish that they had not destroyed the rule of law in this country. But it will be too late to save them.
 

WCH

Believer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
31,009
Reaction score
9,029
Location
The Lone Star State.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Sitting here listening to MSNBC. They are even perplexed.
 

Thoreau72

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
29,638
Reaction score
7,639
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
It's true.

However the rule of law in this country died many years before this fiasco with Clinton.

Nixon was pardoned by Ford, Bush admitted violating FISA, and Barack refused to even investigate Bush's crimes, much less prosecute them.
 

MaggieD

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
43,244
Reaction score
44,663
Location
Chicago Area
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
View attachment 67203789

“Look, here are Comey’s remarks. The material needed to attack Hillary Clinton is all there. A prosecution would be very controversial AND it would cause many people to step back and allow it to take its course — with due process and the presumption of innocence. That route is closed off, but you have the evidence in front of you and can clearly see what she did.”

Althouse: I know you've had a rough day.



And in what is probably a common reaction:

"I am REALLLLY close to casting an [F*** You] vote for Trump. That's how bad things are." - Tweet by @neontaster


The Day the Rule of Law Died



https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/07/05/the-day-the-rule-of-law-died/


There will come a day when Democrats will wish that they had not destroyed the rule of law in this country. But it will be too late to save them.

I have to admit I'm bewildered. Maybe one has to be an attorney to understand the director's reasoning. Especially the part about intent. I always thought "ignorance of the law is no excuse." My cynical self says that's right...unless you're a high-enough ranking politician.

IMO, the reason so many of us are angry is because of the blatant disregard shown by HC. She certainly knew what she was doing was wrong. Sshe basically said, "It's more convenient for me. Screw you and your regulations."

On the other hand, IS it a law that one cant use their own servers? After having THIS ah-ha moment, I wonder what law HC broke by using her own servers.

Anyone know?
 

Thoreau72

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
29,638
Reaction score
7,639
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I have to admit I'm bewildered. Maybe one has to be an attorney to understand the director's reasoning. Especially the part about intent. I always thought "ignorance of the law is no excuse." My cynical self says that's right...unless you're a high-enough ranking politician.

IMO, the reason so many of us are angry is because of the blatant disregard shown by HC. She certainly knew what she was doing was wrong. Sshe basically said, "It's more convenient for me. Screw you and your regulations."

On the other hand, IS it a law that one cant use their own servers? After having THIS ah-ha moment, I wonder what law HC broke by using her own servers.

Anyone know?

Only cynical bastards like myself are not bewildered. God bless your innocence.

I agree with those who say that this email fiasco is small fry compared to what a proper examination of the Clinton Foundation would show.
 

blaxshep

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
16,875
Reaction score
7,666
Location
St. Petersburg
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I have to admit I'm bewildered. Maybe one has to be an attorney to understand the director's reasoning. Especially the part about intent. I always thought "ignorance of the law is no excuse." My cynical self says that's right...unless you're a high-enough ranking politician.

IMO, the reason so many of us are angry is because of the blatant disregard shown by HC. She certainly knew what she was doing was wrong. Sshe basically said, "It's more convenient for me. Screw you and your regulations."

On the other hand, IS it a law that one cant use their own servers? After having THIS ah-ha moment, I wonder what law HC broke by using her own servers.

Anyone know?

I wonder how many donations she got from sharing emails on her private server?
 

RetiredUSN

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
34,605
Reaction score
19,259
Location
Norfolk Virginia area.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
It's true.

However the rule of law in this country died many years before this fiasco with Clinton.

Nixon was pardoned by Ford, Bush admitted violating FISA, and Barack refused to even investigate Bush's crimes, much less prosecute them.

Excusing accountability is never right no matter who is guilty. The system has been broken since Lincoln, or even before.
 

DamnYankee

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
7,370
Reaction score
3,469
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
“Look, here are Comey’s remarks...

And in what is probably a common reaction:

"I am REALLLLY close to casting an [F*** You] vote for Trump..."

ROTFLMAO. Yep. A vote for DJT from me is definitely gonna happen, and I encourage every red blooded American to do the same. Hell, I’m even going to encourage the RATs (Repubs. Against Trump) to do the same. After all a vote for anyone else is a vote for The Queen of Corruption, aka Crooked Hillary.

Sitting here listening to MSNBC. They are even perplexed.

Dang, that’s not hard. lol

It's true.

And this is why I have been saying for a long time. The American gov’t is a big flippin joke and ALL of them politicians need to be voted out and prosecuted to the fullest.

I have to admit I'm bewildered.

IMO, the reason so many of us are angry is because of the blatant disregard shown by HC. She certainly knew what she was doing was wrong. Sshe basically said, "It's more convenient for me. Screw you and your regulations."

I’m not surprised. I was going to be surprised if Crooked Hillary did get prosecuted. But all of this is living proof that our gov’t is corrupt to its core. So much so it makes any Latin American Banana Republic look good by comparison.

Only cynical bastards like myself are not bewildered.

Amen Bro!!!


I wonder how many donations she got from sharing emails on her private server?

LMAO, My thought exactly. We will never know how much the Clinton Crime Family sold America for. And watch the far kook left still vote for her. LOL
 

CriticalThought

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
19,657
Reaction score
8,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I can't get worked up about it. It showed incompetence on her part and possibly a blatant attempt to get around the system but after living through the George W. Bush administration, this is well within tolerable limits. If anything it should make people appreciate Obama more. And if anyone thinks Trump will be better, they are deluding themselves.
 

blaxshep

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
16,875
Reaction score
7,666
Location
St. Petersburg
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
I can't get worked up about it. It showed incompetence on her part and possibly a blatant attempt to get around the system but after living through the George W. Bush administration, this is well within tolerable limits. If anything it should make people appreciate Obama more. And if anyone thinks Trump will be better, they are deluding themselves.

It wasn't incompetence, it was willful and I have no doubt she sold secrets for donations.
 

Deuce

Outer space potato man
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
95,080
Reaction score
47,464
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
It wasn't incompetence, it was willful and I have no doubt she sold secrets for donations.

Hahahahah the **** these people will just make up.
 

TheGoverness

Little Miss Sunshine
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
39,225
Reaction score
48,089
Location
Houston Area, TX
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
It wasn't incompetence, it was willful and I have no doubt she sold secrets for donations.

I don't know about that. I've got no idea what she might've done, but it probably wasn't good.
 

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,243
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
View attachment 67203789

“Look, here are Comey’s remarks. The material needed to attack Hillary Clinton is all there. A prosecution would be very controversial AND it would cause many people to step back and allow it to take its course — with due process and the presumption of innocence. That route is closed off, but you have the evidence in front of you and can clearly see what she did.”

Althouse: I know you've had a rough day.



And in what is probably a common reaction:

"I am REALLLLY close to casting an [F*** You] vote for Trump. That's how bad things are." - Tweet by @neontaster


The Day the Rule of Law Died



https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/07/05/the-day-the-rule-of-law-died/


There will come a day when Democrats will wish that they had not destroyed the rule of law in this country. But it will be too late to save them.

Did you really think the Obama administration would let Hillary flame out? When she's leading the polls? Had another, more viable GOP Candidate risen, and she was losing, this would not be happening.
 

ALiberalModerate

Pragmatist
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
29,569
Reaction score
19,897
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
You mean laws are just for midgets?
 

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,767
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
It's true.

However the rule of law in this country died many years before this fiasco with Clinton.

Nixon was pardoned by Ford, Bush admitted violating FISA, and Barack refused to even investigate Bush's crimes, much less prosecute them.

Pardon is well within the power of the Presidency, FISA has never had any real jurisdiction over the Executive Branch, and two separate bipartisan commissions examined the decision to go into Iraq and found no wrongdoing. I think what we have with Hillary is something quite different: the FBI describes and acknowledges actionable wrongdoing and advises no prosecution. You know as well as I that the fix was in.
 

blaxshep

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
16,875
Reaction score
7,666
Location
St. Petersburg
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Pardon is well within the power of the Presidency, FISA has never had any real jurisdiction over the Executive Branch, and two separate bipartisan commissions examined the decision to go into Iraq and found no wrongdoing. I think what we have with Hillary is something quite different: the FBI describes and acknowledges actionable wrongdoing and advises no prosecution. You know as well as I that the fix was in.

This should be a wake up call for those that still do not believe there is a corrupt establishment. I see more people gravitating to Trump over this.
 

Mr Person

A Little Bitter
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
60,091
Reaction score
51,612
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Unless someone can prove that the DOJ was lying when it said that there is no precedent for a federal prosecution on these facts, people need to stop squeal-whine-crying about this.



But if it works as a verbal binky, consider this: congressional Republicans are demanding an investigation of the investigation.




Their witch-hunt failed, so now they're going to try to go after everybody who didn't indict a political enemy at their demand. The United States of Soviet...err...America?
 

WCH

Believer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
31,009
Reaction score
9,029
Location
The Lone Star State.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Unless someone can prove that the DOJ was lying when it said that there is no precedent for a federal prosecution on these facts, people need to stop squeal-whine-crying about this.



But if it works as a verbal binky, consider this: congressional Republicans are demanding an investigation of the investigation.




Their witch-hunt failed, so now they're going to try to go after everybody who didn't indict a political enemy at their demand. The United States of Soviet...err...America?

Hell, if she can find enough deaf dumb and blind supporters like you, she might actually win.
 

Thoreau72

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
29,638
Reaction score
7,639
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Pardon is well within the power of the Presidency, FISA has never had any real jurisdiction over the Executive Branch, and two separate bipartisan commissions examined the decision to go into Iraq and found no wrongdoing. I think what we have with Hillary is something quite different: the FBI describes and acknowledges actionable wrongdoing and advises no prosecution. You know as well as I that the fix was in.

Certainly the fix was in. On that we agree.

My point was only that the rule of law in this country has been dead for a very long time. Those in government have privilege, but those like Martha Stewart are held to a higher standard.

When Bush admitted that he had violated the letter of the FISA statute, not an eyebrow was raised in Congress. See what I mean?
 

Velvet Elvis

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
4,954
Reaction score
2,195
Location
Midwest
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
For a lot of people, this doesn't change anything. The mindset is that the woman is more corrupt than Kenneth Lay.

I'd vote for a dead cat before I vote for Hillary Clinton.
 

CriticalThought

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
19,657
Reaction score
8,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
It wasn't incompetence, it was willful and I have no doubt she sold secrets for donations.

Sure. And Bush was behind 9-11. Such statements say more about the people who make them than about the reality.
 

cpwill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
72,982
Reaction score
37,983
Location
USofA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I have to admit I'm bewildered. Maybe one has to be an attorney to understand the director's reasoning.

Nah. I think the "Too Big To Fail" excuse is pretty graspable, even by those of us without law degrees.

Especially the part about intent. I always thought "ignorance of the law is no excuse." My cynical self says that's right...unless you're a high-enough ranking politician.

IMO, the reason so many of us are angry is because of the blatant disregard shown by HC. She certainly knew what she was doing was wrong. Sshe basically said, "It's more convenient for me. Screw you and your regulations."

That. And that it puts the nail in rule of law, and Comey basically admitted that.

On the other hand, IS it a law that one cant use their own servers? After having THIS ah-ha moment, I wonder what law HC broke by using her own servers.

Anyone know?

It is a law that you cannot do so for classified information. Rather serious law. The kind we would like to discuss with Mr Snowden, and for which we have made Mr Manning our guest.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 

cpwill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
72,982
Reaction score
37,983
Location
USofA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I can't get worked up about it. It showed incompetence on her part and possibly a blatant attempt to get around the system but after living through the George W. Bush administration, this is well within tolerable limits. If anything it should make people appreciate Obama more. And if anyone thinks Trump will be better, they are deluding themselves.

Good point. It's not like this happened during the Obama administration, or like his administration was involved in the decision to give her a pass....


Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 

CriticalThought

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
19,657
Reaction score
8,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Good point. It's not like this happened during the Obama administration, or like his administration was involved in the decision to give her a pass....


Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

Why is it that everything is Obama's fault but Bush was completely blameless during his time in office?
 
Top Bottom