• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Judge rejects challenges to Georgia voters before Senate runoffs

OpportunityCost said:
The guy talking post comprehension can't read a post.
Click to expand...
You were asked several times if the sister was a party to the lawsuit. You of course wouldn’t answer because the answer shows your “concern” about impropriety to abject nonsense. So, by not answering you conceding the argument. I gladly accepted it.
 
OpportunityCost said:
LOL arguing from absolute ignorance. You're dismissed.
Click to expand...
Running away with your tail between your legs simply because you were so desperate to see a connection where there wasn't one. I don't apologize for enlightening you. You are angry because the judge has a sister who you don't like, who is somewhere else doing something else.
 
If Republicans or Democrats for that matter have the names and addresses of 4, 400 or 4,000 potentially improperly registered potential electors why not contact them and help them correct any registration discrepancies or confirm that they are not eligible, then go to election authorities with the findings. Why must they always run to some court first to file some lawsuit? Litigious bastards!
 
Luce said:
Dude, the president hired his whole damn family. Nobody gives a shit about optics anymore.
Click to expand...

There is practically nothing that Republicans or so called Conservatives can stand on and point their fingers at Democrats in admonishment without being self identified as hypocrites. That includes them trying to dis the Left about "optics".

The highest "moral political high ground" any Rightie stands on these days is at the bottom of the deepest, darkest, dankest most vermin infested dry well.
 
LouC said:
If Republicans or Democrats for that matter have the names and addresses of 4, 400 or 4,000 potentially improperly registered potential electors why not contact them and help them correct any registration discrepancies or confirm that they are not eligible, then go to election authorities with the findings. Why must they always run to some court first to file some lawsuit? Litigious bastards!
Click to expand...




Screen Shot 2021-01-01 at 6.38.00 PM.webp

 
LouC said:
If Republicans or Democrats for that matter have the names and addresses of 4, 400 or 4,000 potentially improperly registered potential electors why not contact them and help them correct any registration discrepancies or confirm that they are not eligible, then go to election authorities with the findings. Why must they always run to some court first to file some lawsuit? Litigious bastards!
Click to expand...
We don't know where people live. They were going to be allowed to vote provisional ballots if they showed up and their registrations straightened out afterwards. But the Democrats ran to court.
 
bearpoker said:
The judge wants actual evidence? No wonder the right whingers have their panties in a wad.......again!
Click to expand...
The evidence was that these people filed change of address forms saying they moved out of the state.
 
Rawley said:
We don't know where people live. They were going to be allowed to vote provisional ballots if they showed up and their registrations straightened out afterwards. But the Democrats ran to court.
Click to expand...

Link?
 
poweRob said:
Running away with your tail between your legs simply because you were so desperate to see a connection where there wasn't one. I don't apologize for enlightening you. You are angry because the judge has a sister who you don't like, who is somewhere else doing something else.
Click to expand...
Who is an interested party in the case. The DNC and Georgia Democratic party are an integral part of the outcome.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Who is an interested party in the case. The DNC and Georgia Democratic party are an integral part of the outcome.
Click to expand...
So is humanity. So all humans should recuse from things that make humanity better.

Good GOD you guys are so desperate.
 
poweRob said:
So is humanity. So all humans should recuse from things that make humanity better.

Good GOD you guys are so desperate.
Click to expand...

2 decades of crying about Bush v Gore later, your opinion of desperation isn't worth a wet fart.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Who is an interested party in the case. The DNC and Georgia Democratic party are an integral part of the outcome.
Click to expand...
I see, so any judge who has a family member who is a Democrat must recuse? Is that the standard? How about if the judge has a family member who is a Georgia Republican? Must they recuse because the RNC and Georgia Republican party are an integral part of the outcome? :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom