• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Hands Gavin Newsom Control of National Guard in Blow to Trump

GIJane said:
Judge Breyer is hardly objective, being Clinton appointee.
Click to expand...
By your above measure, all federal judges are incapable of being objective.
GIJane said:
Once it goes up the chain he, like others, will be overturned.
Click to expand...
What’s the score on injunctions won on appeal by the current Traitor Trump administration? 🤔
GIJane said:
No one bitched when Eisenhower and Kennedy did the same thing to enforce civil right laws. Well, individuals bitched, but no one was dumb enough to take it to court.
Click to expand...
“Dumb”, really dumb, is any attempt to compare Eisenhower and Kennedy’s use of NG forces to enforce federal integration law and protect black folks in states with horrific histories of violence against them and their ancestors with the ongoing dispute between Newsom and Traitor Trump.
GIJane said:
I might add that when Abbot of Texas was using the Guard to enforce border control, Dems tried to get Biden to federalize the Texas guard under HIS control. I guarantee none of you would have been concerned in THAT case.
Click to expand...
SCOTUS ruled in Biden’s favor. Biden chose not to federalize the Texas NG.
 
ElChupacabra said:
It isn't, if you read the rulings, some of which have come from the Supreme Court as well.
Click to expand...
The issue is the Democrat campaign of filing lawsuits as a means of nullification of the election.
ElChupacabra said:
They lost an election, sure. To complain about litigation considering it's Trump's preferred way to settle things is worth a chuckle.
Click to expand...
Trump using lawsuits in his business career has nothing to do with the Democrats anti Constitutional lawsuit blitz.
ElChupacabra said:
Well that's what many of these lawsuits have been about, specifically perceived overreaches of executive power. You should know this because all of the Project 2025 folks in the administration have been pushing the unitary executive theory and are taking their shots.
Click to expand...
There is no way to get to 350 lawsuits in 6 months with a focus on broad overreaches of Executive power. The vast majority are complaints about things like the Trump administration delayed grant money to review the expenditure or ICE enforcement near schools. There are even lawsuits contesting disclosure of information between offices of the executive branch. It's abuse of the judicial system for Democrat obstructionism.
 
AZRWinger said:
The issue is the Democrat campaign of filing lawsuits as a means of nullification of the election.
Click to expand...
Incorrect. None of the lawsuits nullify the results of the election.

AZRWinger said:
Trump using lawsuits in his business career has nothing to do with the Democrats anti Constitutional lawsuit blitz.
Click to expand...
It does when he fills his DOJ with ex-personal lawyers.
:)

This whole idea of the lawsuits being unconstitutional is absurd, since they are challenging the legality of some of the EOs. That's exactly what the legal system is for, and the judiciary is one of the checks and balances the founders put in place so we don't end up with a leader who decides to pass an EO declaring prima nocta with a legal challenge.


AZRWinger said:
There is no way to get to 350 lawsuits in 6 months with a focus on broad overreaches of Executive power. The vast majority are complaints about things like the Trump administration delayed grant money to review the expenditure or ICE enforcement near schools. There are even lawsuits contesting disclosure of information between offices of the executive branch. It's abuse of the judicial system for Democrat obstructionism.
Click to expand...
Sure, because many of the actions of the current administration were designed to be a full frontal assault on how things have been normally done by testing the legal limits of a wide array of existing policies and procedures. The Project 2025 folks designed it this way and meant to overwhelm the legal system so it couldn't react to everything, but they're finding out there was more resistance than planned.
 
Ninth Circuit issues a unanimous stay of Lower Court decision on the grounds that the Trump administration appeal is likely to succeed.

1750426299386.webp1750426321592.webp

This has no bearing on deployment of regular military, though I'm not sure who would have standing in such a case challenging that deployment since I believe the regular military are being stationed on federal property, not on public streets.
 
Last edited:
SkyChief said:
This is bad news for Trump.


Dems are finally taking control. . . . I'm kidding, of course. 🤣

"Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow." - Gavin Newsom

Yeah - right. :LOL: As if Trump is going to accept the ruling of some low-level district court activist judge.
Click to expand...
Your disagreement with a judge following the constitution does not make them an activist judge.

Stop with the reich-wing bullshit.
 
Taylor said:
How many violent protests have there been and how many Federal buildings have been attacked since the NG was deployed?
Click to expand...
They are mostly standing around doing nothing and sucking up millions in tax dollars. My honest guess is there would be little or no change in that number with or without them. LAPD has been doing just fine agitating protesters all on their own. NG was far more useful in the other roles California had them performing.
 
TangoNoCash said:
They are mostly standing around doing nothing and sucking up millions in tax dollars. My honest guess is there would be little or no change in that number with or without them. LAPD has been doing just fine agitating protesters all on their own. NG was far more useful in the other roles California had them performing.
Click to expand...
Gavin predicted their presence would make things worse. He was wrong. It has gotten much better. Glad the city is safe from his poor judgment for now.
 
This thread didn't age very well.
What's that saying about counting chickens before they hatch? :ROFLMAO:

Trump Celebrates 'Big Win' Over Gavin Newsom in Federal Court: 'A Great Decision for Our Country'
President Donald Trump was handed a major victory in his efforts to get the Los Angeles riots under control, courtesy of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that the three-judge panel of the court ordered Trump could maintain control of the California National Guard, blocking an order by a lower court that would have made him turn over command to California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Click to expand...
 
Taylor said:
Gavin would like nothing more than to remove them and have the situation deteriorate again for his own political gain.
Click to expand...
The impending doom is a figment of your imagination. In most cases the LAPD outnumbers protesters by 12:1. Meh let’s just cheer on DHS for spending like a drunken sailor. As you say it’s political just in a way you’re unwilling to admit.
 
Taylor said:
I was going to say the same to you guys. When did this sudden concern about spending come about? 😂
Click to expand...
we don't mind spending money on things that are helpful.
Your side likes to spend on things that hurt.
 
Taylor said:
How many violent protests have there been and how many Federal buildings have been attacked since the NG was deployed?
Click to expand...
How many Federal buildings were "attacked" prior?
 
AZRWinger said:
Democrats are on a pace to file more than a thousand lawsuits during President Trump’s second term in a blatant campaign to promote judicial tyranny. But let's ignore the fact the Democrats are ignoring the will of the voters in the election by filing more lawsuits to harass the Bad Orange Man than every other President faced combined. It's Trump's DOJ defending against the campaign of using lawsuits as a means of political repression that's the problem.
Click to expand...
Been over this in the other thread. Trump is breaking the law in unheard of amounts. It’s why he keeps getting his ass handed to him in court, by both Republican and Democrat appointed judges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom