Judge Hands Gavin Newsom Control of National Guard in Blow to Trump

[rahl]

Check your talking points.

I don’t have talking points. I have reality.

One of the most reliably radical Left appeals courts in the country sided with our President.

Yes. In this recent case. He’s lost far more than he’s won.

Who can blame them for sending a message to the violent Leftist street militias in San Francisco where the court is based.

Non sequitur.

 

[AZRWinger]

Did I complain about the judges? No.

What I complained about - if that's what you want to call it I'd call it - was the characterization that the panel was "radical left" which given the 2 Trump appointees on the panel is false as is the implication that because it was a "radical left" panel that the case wasn't even a close call.

I was also at pains to say that I wasn't implying that the Trump appointees ruled as they did because they were Trump appointees.

My comment referred to the history of the 9th circuit court of appeals. A history that makes this decision surprising.

You may not go along with the talking point Trump's actions are so blatantly unconstitutional even Republican judges reject them but it's parroted frequently.

 

[AZRWinger]

I don’t have talking points. I have reality.

Yes. In this recent case. He’s lost far more than he’s won.

Non sequitur.

The reality is the grasping Democrat California Governor lost on appeal.

This Trump is losing in court talking point is frequently parroted. But as this case shows counting injunctions from District courts as victories is problematic.

An attractive feature to the Orange Man Bad lynch mob of the strategy of filing hundreds of lawsuits is that it muddies the waters to the point it's difficult to get a clear picture of the campaign's success or failure.

 

[rahl]

The reality is the grasping Democrat California Governor lost on appeal.

I know.

This Trump is losing in court talking point is frequently parroted.

Because he keeps having his ass handed to him. All the way up to the Supreme Court.

But as this case shows counting injunctions from District courts as victories is problematic.

No it isn’t.

An attractive feature to the Orange Man Bad lynch mob of the strategy of filing hundreds of lawsuits is that it muddies the waters to the point it's difficult to get a clear picture of the campaign's success or failure.

It’s so funny when you pretend having lawsuits filed against the president in an unprecedented amount, because of the unprecedented unconstitutional actions he has taken, is political.

 

[AZRWinger]

I know.

Because he keeps having his ass handed to him. All the way up to the Supreme Court.

Where is the verification for this claim?

No it isn’t.

The simple fact is the glorious victory of the injunction handing control back to the Governor turned out to be illusory.

It’s so funny when you pretend having lawsuits filed against the president in an unprecedented amount, because of the unprecedented unconstitutional actions he has taken, is political.

Ah yes, the claim of necessity the refuge of authoritarianism throughout history. Let's ignore the Democrats incessant, anything goes campaign of political repression targeting the Bad Orange Man as if it didn't exist.

 

[rahl]

Where is the verification for this claim?

Court rulings

The simple fact is the glorious victory of the injunction handing control back to the Governor turned out to be illusory.

Ok

Ah yes, the claim of necessity the refuge of authoritarianism throughout history.

Let's ignore the Democrats incessant, anything goes campaign of political repression targeting the Bad Orange Man as if it didn't exist.

This moronic canard has been refuted every time you’ve parroted it. Trump is behaving unconstitutionally in a manner we have never seen before. Hence why he keeps having his ass handed to him in court.

 

[AZRWinger]

Court rulings

Another broad rhetorical generalization with no supporting evidence.

Ok



This moronic canard has been refuted every time you’ve parroted it. Trump is behaving unconstitutionally in a manner we have never seen before. Hence why he keeps having his ass handed to him in court.

There you go again. Anyone who questions abusing the court system with an unprecedented 350 lawsuits is supposedly moronic. How impressive.

If you'd bothered to look at the lawsuits instead of parroting simplistic talking points you'd find they are the product of a deliberate design to drag every policy of the Trump administration before a Federal District judge bypassing Congress. Nothing is more blatantly unconstitutional.

 

[rahl]

Another broad rhetorical generalization with no supporting evidence.

I’m not sure who you think you are fooling by claiming you don’t know of all the curb stomping Trump has been receiving at every level of the judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court.

There you go again. Anyone who questions abusing the court system with an unprecedented 350 lawsuits is supposedly moronic. How impressive.

When you pretend it’s not because of trumps unprecedented amount of unconstitutional actions, everyone knows you aren’t being serious.

If you'd bothered to look at the lawsuits instead of parroting simplistic talking points you'd find they are the product of a deliberate design to drag every policy of the Trump administration before a Federal District judge bypassing Congress.

Nope. Trump keeps violating the constitution, and keeps getting slapped down as a result. He has won a handful, but has lost far more than he’s won.

Nothing is more blatantly unconstitutional.

Article 3 is blatantly unconstitutional?

 

[AZRWinger]

I’m not sure who you think you are fooling by claiming you don’t know of all the curb stomping Trump has been receiving at every level of the judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Again vague generalizations. Control of the California National Guard was returned to the President on appeal. SCOTUS dismissed the DC deportation lawsuit for lack of standing. Yesterday the SCOTUS cleared the way for the Trump administration to resume deportations to third countries.

Supreme Court lets Trump administration resume deportations to third countries without notice for now

The Supreme Court agreed to pause a judge's order that prevented the Trump administration from deporting migrants to third countries without first providing them due process.

www.cbsnews.com

Pretending the decrees of forum shopped District court petty dictators are "curb stompings" while they get reversed on appeal isn't fooling anyone.

When you pretend it’s not because of trumps unprecedented amount of unconstitutional actions, everyone knows you aren’t being serious.

A significant number of the Democrat cases are complaints about things like grants being delayed for audit review, anti reform Democrats complaints about information on Federal bureaucrats being made available to DOGE reformers, and even voluntary severance. The plain fact is radical Orange Man Bad Democrats are weaponizing the courts to undermine the election results.

Nope. Trump keeps violating the constitution, and keeps getting slapped down as a result. He has won a handful, but has lost far more than he’s won.

Repeating an unsupported claim doesn't validate it. I have provided examples where so-called court victories haven't survived appeals. All you have is the same tired talking points.

Did you notice the Trump administration complied with the SCOTUS order to effect the so-called Maryland dad's return? Of course he was returned to face US criminal indictments he likely wouldn't have faced if he hadn't been used as a human shield by Democrats.

Article 3 is blatantly unconstitutional?

Again, the issue is the Democrat abuse of the courts to pursue their Orange Man Bad obsession.

 

[rahl]

Again vague generalizations. Control of the California National Guard was returned to the President on appeal. SCOTUS dismissed the DC deportation lawsuit for lack of standing. Yesterday the SCOTUS cleared the way for the Trump administration to resume deportations to third countries.

Supreme Court lets Trump administration resume deportations to third countries without notice for now

The Supreme Court agreed to pause a judge's order that prevented the Trump administration from deporting migrants to third countries without first providing them due process.

www.cbsnews.com

Pretending the decrees of forum shopped District court petty dictators are "curb stompings" while they get reversed on appeal isn't fooling anyone.

A significant number of the Democrat cases are complaints about things like grants being delayed for audit review, anti reform Democrats complaints about information on Federal bureaucrats being made available to DOGE reformers, and even voluntary severance. The plain fact is radical Orange Man Bad Democrats are weaponizing the courts to undermine the election results.

Repeating an unsupported claim doesn't validate it. I have provided examples where so-called court victories haven't survived appeals. All you have is the same tired talking points.

Did you notice the Trump administration complied with the SCOTUS order to effect the so-called Maryland dad's return? Of course he was returned to face US criminal indictments he likely wouldn't have faced if he hadn't been used as a human shield by Democrats.

Again, the issue is the Democrat abuse of the courts to pursue their Orange Man Bad obsession.

Refuted all this already