May as well add Schumer and McCarthy to that list too. Oh wait, the Committee is trying to ask McCarthy questions, but he's peed his panties and unable to speak to the 1/6 Committee. Seriously, I have no idea about when, but our option is to wait until the final report comes out to learn more about the security failures.There are suspicions about Pelosi. When do you think they will be asking her about the security around the Capitol? Mitch as well.
True.You, I and millions of other folks will need to wait until the 1/6 Committee's final report comes out to read if additional information aside from the Senate's June report is revealed.
Still doesn't change that the J6 committee is little more than a politically driven, political Kabuki theater, given that the most consistent political push narrative has been, and will likely continue to be, 'Trump supporters and Republicans are the same as 1/6 'insurrectionists' and a threat to our Democracy', when none of those things are factual or true.Until then, the 1/6 Committee's blue team has quietly been working on the security failures at the Capitol on 1/6/21.
The documents, committee aides and other officials familiar with them say, shed new light on questions that have been only partly answered so far, including what intelligence came into the FBI, DHS and other agencies in the weeks before Jan. 6, why no formal bulletin was issued and why more wasn’t done to make sure the Capitol Police understood and were prepared for the gravity of the threat.January 6th committee has team to find FBI, DHS intel failures
The “Blue Team” is quietly examining thousands of internal documents that shed new light on what officials did and didn’t know before the Capitol riot.www.nbcnews.com
The blue team, working behind the scenes, has a different focus: to provide what may be the only detailed appraisal of why the government failed to anticipate and stop the coordinated violence that sent federal lawmakers scrambling to safety in their own building.
The June Senate report criticized the Capitol Police for failing to act on threat information and circulate relevant intelligence. But the report had less to say about the FBI and DHS, in part because they hadn’t yet fully responded to requests for documents, officials said.
You seem to have me confused with someone else, or are overly broad brushing.I would actually agree with this, if there was the slightest indication that you actually believed it. But years of evidence demonstrates that the entire opposite is true. In thread after thread after thread you will willingly throw anyone you dislike under the bus without a scintilla of evidence, and then bray, obfuscate and object whenever it is one of your preferred oxes being gored, even when there is a plethora of publicly available, irrefutable evidence. Don't you realize how patently obvious you are? It is deliciously hilarious. Good day!
“suspicions about Pelosi.” That’s like “some has said.”There are suspicions about Pelosi. When do you think they will be asking her about the security around the Capitol? Mitch as well.
That's the duty of law enforcement, especially the FBI. I'm wondering though - doesn't law enforcement agencies also detain folks and then question/investigate them?Arresting someone and then investigating is the order of activities.
It's as if I scripted it.... ROFLAEDon't you realize how patently obvious you are? It is deliciously hilarious. Good day!
I agree. This is why I think Dems are soft. When sitting in a pit full of venomous snakes, one shouldn't pet them.Why do we "ask" these people? Why not order them to come in?
Yes. Yes I did. And yet here you are.Did you say "stop crying?" LOL!!!
Or as conservatives are known for... "BACKWARDS!"You guys are funny. Onward!
No argument about the duty.That's the duty of law enforcement, especially the FBI. I'm wondering though - doesn't law enforcement agencies also detain folks and then question/investigate them also?
"Arresting someone and then investigating is the order of activities." ==>> "Arresting someone and then investigating is NOT the proper order of activities."Arresting someone and then investigating is the order of activities.
Normally it is:
This whole idea of 'Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime' is distinctly Soviet, and doesn't belong in the US criminal justice system.
- Determine if a crime has been committed, and if so
- Investigate the crime to determine who committed it
- Arrest, charge, and then a criminal trial
I always find it funny watching trump sheep bitch about the 1/6 committee and carp about how they are "Theater" or "Dog and Pony show" being that it's been done behind closed doors to this point, you haven't a clue as to what they've done. If it were kabuki theater or a dog and pony show, it would be more like Gym Jordan or Lindsay Graham screaming irrelevancies at tv cameras.Still doesn't change that the J6 committee is little more than a politically driven, political Kabuki theater, given that the most consistent political push narrative has been, and will likely continue to be, 'Trump supporters and Republicans are the same as 1/6 'insurrectionists' and a threat to our Democracy', when none of those things are factual or true.
The order of business for the 1/6 Select Committee is to investigate the attempt of an insurrection/coup with intent to impede Congress's validation of the next US president that resulted in a violent assault on the Capitol Building. But, with every committee action in all of Congress, there's political theater involved as well. The nature of the beast. As long as findings come out of this 1/6 Committee, that's the main point for having it.Still doesn't change that the J6 committee is little more than a politically driven, political Kabuki theater, given that the most consistent political push narrative has been, and will likely continue to be,
Already identified long ago that it is as I and others have described.I always find it funny watching trump sheep bitch about the 1/6 committee and carp about how they are "Theater" or "Dog and Pony show" being that it's been done behind closed doors to this point, you haven't a clue as to what they've done. If it were kabuki theater or a dog and pony show, it would be more like Gym Jordan or Lindsay Graham screaming irrelevancies at tv cameras.
Question: What does all this have in common?
Police Officer Calls Trump a 'Hitman' Who Sent 'Terrorists' to the U.S. Capitol at Committee Hearing
Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn called Donald Trump a "hitman" while testifying before the January 6th House Select Committee, asking Congress to hold the former president accountable for his role in the insurrection.www.mediaite.com Aquilino Gonell Slams Trump's 'Pathetic' Behavior at Hearing
Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell declared Donald Trump personally responsible for the storming of the U.S. Capitol.www.mediaite.com 'I Guess This is America': Harry Dunn Delivers Sobering Assessment of the US in Wake of 1/6
“I guess it is American. But it's not the side of America I like. It’s not the side that any of us here represent.”www.mediaite.com Adam Kinzinger Chokes Backs Tears Lauding Capitol Police
Rep. Adam Kinzinger choked backed tears as he lauded Capitol Police officers before lacing into the partisan politics of his Republican colleagues.www.mediaite.com MPD Officer to 1/6 Committee: Trump Supporters Told Me 'Your Mother's a Whore'
One of the witnesses to testify on Tuesday at the first House select committee to investigate the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol recalled supporters of then-President Donald Trump telling him, “Your mother’s a whore.”www.mediaite.com Michael Fanone Blasts Disgraceful Capitol Riot Downplaying
DC Metropolitan Police Officer Michael Fanone unleashed over the "disgraceful" attempts to minimize what he went through during the storming of the U.S. Capitolwww.mediaite.com 'This is How I'm Going to Die': Capitol Police Officer Fights Tears Recalling Family 'Frantically' Calling Him During Capitol Riot
U.S. Capitol Police Sergeant Aquilino Gonell fought back tears as he described the harrowing violence that occurred during the Jan. 6 riot before a House select committee investigating the attack. Gonell began his testimony by calling for accountability in the "horrific and shameful" attack...www.mediaite.com
Answer: Spin, speculation, innuendo, hyperbole...and lies...with no other purpose than to give the media a slew of talking points.
btw, the same group that orchestrated the hit job on a Supreme Court nominee is controlling this hit job on American citizens.
Sometimes pictures are worth thousands of words. Seeing former DOJ official David Laufman show up at Nancy Pelosi’s J6 Committee hearing explains the pantomime.David Laufman is seen below sitting behind committee witness Michael Fanone. Laufman was the DOJ-NSD official who interviewed Hillary Clinton during the fraudulent FBI Clinton email investigation of 2016; Laufman quit the DOJ and started working for Lawfare. Laufman then represented Monica McLean, the best FBI friend of Christine Blasey Ford who helped write the letter to Dianne Feinstein during their effort to block Justice Kavanaugh for SCOTUS Judge.Monica McLean was busted by Senator Grassley for witness tampering; and then hired “beach friend” David Laufman to avoid legal trouble. {Go Deep Here and Go Deep Here}.What does Laufman showing up at another political pantomime disguised as a hearing tell us?It tells us the same Lawfare crew is producing, directing and writing the script for democrats again. The cast of characters, vis-a-vis witnesses, are different; however, the script is exactly the same. This is what they do. This is all political theater, written, directed and produced for public consumption. Nothing more.J6 Committee Hearing Has The Same Lawfare Producers, Directors and Script Writers as Christine Blasey Ford "Beach Friend" Hearing - The Last Refuge
What does Laufman showing up at another political pantomime hearing tell us? It tells us the same Lawfare crew is producing, directing and writing the script for democrats again.theconservativetreehouse.com
Any questions?
"insurrection/coup" is just so much politically driven overblown hype, and yet this is the basis on which this committee was formed and founded.The order of business for the 1/6 Select Committee is to investigate the attempt of an insurrection/coup with intent to impede Congress's validation of the next US president that resulted in a violent assault on the Capitol Building. But, with every committee action, there's political theater involved as well. The nature of the beast. As long as findings come out of this 1/6 Committee, that's the main point for having it.
Let’s stick to provable facts.You actually think there is any basis to think that he was giving tours, the day before the attack, to people to help with the attack? First, it's a little crazy to think that, especially without any indication that it happened. Remember that. There is zero indication that this occurred, other than Democrats blurting it out and pointing fingers. But, the committee on unamerican activities is pulling people in on a whim.
I would hope they would be careful to make sure they have evidence to establish any claim they make.
True.
Still doesn't change that the J6 committee is little more than a politically driven, political Kabuki theater, given that the most consistent political push narrative has been, and will likely continue to be, 'Trump supporters and Republicans are the same as 1/6 'insurrectionists' and a threat to our Democracy', when none of those things are factual or true.
1. Determine if a crime may have been committed.Arresting someone and then investigating is the order of activities.
Normally it is:
This whole idea of 'Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime' is distinctly Soviet, and doesn't belong in the US criminal justice system.
- Determine if a crime has been committed, and if so
- Investigate the crime to determine who committed it
- Arrest, charge, and then a criminal trial
Opinion notedTrue.
Still doesn't change that the J6 committee is little more than a politically driven, political Kabuki theater, given that the most consistent political push narrative has been, and will likely continue to be, 'Trump supporters and Republicans are the same as 1/6 'insurrectionists' and a threat to our Democracy', when none of those things are factual or true.
There are surveillance cameras all over. The panel says they have definitive evidence that he did give a tour. Probably video.You actually think there is any basis to think that he was giving tours, the day before the attack, to people to help with the attack? First, it's a little crazy to think that, especially without any indication that it happened. Remember that. There is zero indication that this occurred, other than Democrats blurting it out and pointing fingers. But, the committee on unamerican activities is pulling people in on a whim.
Unfortunately for the democrats it keeps blowing up in their faces. The Russian Collusion Hoax is now under investigation and adding to Hillary Clintons decades long list of scandals. And when the GOP takes over the House of Reps late next January, the J6 Select Committee will end up under investigation for what it did not investigate. And even the first impeachment of Trump accelerated the investigation of Biden's crack addicted son Hunter, which could ultimately lead to Biden's impeachment.As long as the Democrats are in control of the House and believe it to be a political advantage to them.
Nope. See comment above.
Pelosi's J6 Select Committee was never about finding the truth (other than their demanded political truth) nor to put into place measures to prevent similar in the future, it was intended designed for nothing more than to baselessly smear any differing political opinions and positions other than their own as insurrectionists, a dire threat to democracy suitable for DOJ classification as domestic terrorists and persecuted as such, when the reality is that the J6 riot which got out of hand, no more so than the so called 'mostly peaceful arsonists in previous riots which got out of control, for perceived political advantage. All that makes the J6 'Select Committee' little more than politically driven political Kabuki theater for the willful political propagandists accomplices media's cameras. A charade.
First, there is no investigation of Hillary Clinton. Choose another news outlet. What is happening is that a minor figure was charged with a narrow charge of lying to the FBI because he said he wasn't working for anyone when he spoke to the FBI.Unfortunately for the democrats it keeps blowing up in their faces. The Russian Collusion Hoax is now under investigation and adding to Hillary Clintons decades long list of scandals. And when the GOP takes over the House of Reps late next January, the J6 Select Committee will end up under investigation for what it did not investigate. And even the first impeachment of Trump accelerated the investigation of Biden's crack addicted son Hunter, which could ultimately lead to Biden's impeachment.
Very little of that rant is anywhere close to coherent. Hillary is absolutely under investigation:First, there is no investigation of Hillary Clinton. Choose another news outlet. What is happening is that a minor figure was charged with a narrow charge of lying to the FBI because he said he wasn't working for anyone when he spoke to the FBI.
Second, there is no "scandal." Trying to get the press to write uncomplimentary articles about your opponent isn't illegal. Trump did it in spades.
Third, investigate the committee? You mean a retribution driven witchhunt? What the committee is doing, investigating an attack on the Capitol and democracy, Republicans of yesteryear would have applauded. The new GOP are just a bunch of fascist authoritarians, who wanted to overthrow American democracy and don't want anyone looking into their crimes.
Fourth, you need to pour ice water on yourself because having such a boner for Hunter Biden is unhealthy.
Where do you guys find such ridiculous sources?Very little of that rant is anywhere close to coherent. Hillary is absolutely under investigation:
Authorities Admit Currently Investigating Members of Hillary Clinton's 2016 Campaign: Durham
John Durham's team asked the judge of the federal court to 'inquire into a potential conflict of interest.'www.westernjournal.com
And Hillary has been embroiled in non-stop scandals throughout her career, going all the way back to the 1980s. Next I suppose you will say she was never under investigation for her email scandals. The rest of your post is a combination of ultra partisan fantasy and TDS.
Is that the best you can Google -- a six month old commentary from an obscure right-wing newspaper?Very little of that rant is anywhere close to coherent. Hillary is absolutely under investigation:
Authorities Admit Currently Investigating Members of Hillary Clinton's 2016 Campaign: Durham
John Durham's team asked the judge of the federal court to 'inquire into a potential conflict of interest.'www.westernjournal.com
And Hillary has been embroiled in non-stop scandals throughout her career, going all the way back to the 1980s. Next I suppose you will say she was never under investigation for her email scandals. The rest of your post is a combination of ultra partisan fantasy and TDS.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?