• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Israeli nuclear counterstike

Would you support an Israeli nuclear response to an Iranian nuclear attack?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

M14 Shooter

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
68
Location
Toledo-ish OH
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
In the news today, we see a story regarding how close the Iranians are to a nuclear weapon.

One of the greatest concerns regarding a nuclear-capable Iran is that they will use their nuke(s) against Israel.

If Iran were to nuke Israel, would you support or oppose an Israeli nuclear response? Why?
 

Deegan

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
2
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
M14 Shooter said:
In the news today, we see a story regarding how close the Iranians are to a nuclear weapons.

One of th egreatest concerns regarding a nuclear-capable Iran is that they will use their nuke(s) against Israel.

If Iran were to nuke Israel, would you support or oppose an Israeli nuclear response? Why?

And now Russia has agreed to sell them the missiles they need to launch a strike against Israel. Russia has become little more then a weapons wh0re these days, they are irresponsible, and as unstable as ever they were, it's a very serious problem.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051205/ap_on_re_eu/russia_iran_arms
 

cnredd

Major General Big Lug
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 5, 2005
Messages
8,682
Reaction score
262
Location
Philadelphia,PA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
I say the United Nations should get involved.

:2rofll: :2funny: :lamo :laughat:
 

Vader

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
8,260
Reaction score
1,064
Location
Whitewater, CO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
M14 Shooter said:
In the news today, we see a story regarding how close the Iranians are to a nuclear weapon.

One of the greatest concerns regarding a nuclear-capable Iran is that they will use their nuke(s) against Israel.

If Iran were to nuke Israel, would you support or oppose an Israeli nuclear response? Why?

It's time that the Iranian threat is neutalized. I honestly believe that the only way to keep Iran in check is destroy all of their nuclear facilities. If the mullahs cannot be controlled then they must be DESTROYED!

Death to the MULLAHS
Death to the President of Iran
Death to RADICAL ISLAM
 

new coup for you

Upper West Side Jacobin
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
10,643
Reaction score
2,283
Location
Philly, "The City that shoves you back!"
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Vader said:
Sounds like you're a terrorist!
i'm tired of hearing people cry about an area of sand smaller then New Jersey

i also don't think said country is worth antagonizing half the world against America

So if Iran wants to end all the bullshit then i'm for it
 

LaMidRighter

Klattu Verata Nicto
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
30,534
Reaction score
10,682
Location
Louisiana
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
cnredd said:
I say the United Nations should get involved.

:2rofll: :2funny: :lamo :laughat:
Why? So that they can form a committee to vote on the willingness to discuss possibly condemning the action by saying they strongly verbally oppose violence against Israel. ROFL.
 

GarzaUK

That European Guy
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
3,682
Reaction score
625
Location
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Vader said:
It's time that the Iranian threat is neutalized. I honestly believe that the only way to keep Iran in check is destroy all of their nuclear facilities. If the mullahs cannot be controlled then they must be DESTROYED!

Death to the MULLAHS
Death to the President of Iran
Death to RADICAL ISLAM
Replace Mullahs and Radical Islam with the West and America and you sound just like jolly old Bin Laden.
 

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,319
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
M14 Shooter said:
In the news today, we see a story regarding how close the Iranians are to a nuclear weapon.

One of the greatest concerns regarding a nuclear-capable Iran is that they will use their nuke(s) against Israel.

If Iran were to nuke Israel, would you support or oppose an Israeli nuclear response? Why?
Of course Israel should respond to nukes with nukes. Israel is tiny and Iran is huge; one nuclear attack on Israel would virtually devastate the country and represent an existential threat. They would have little choice but to launch an all-out nuclear assault on Iran (as would the US, UK, France, and India).
 

Kelzie

The Almighty
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
13,534
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Denver, CO
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
They really should do it (and I'm sure they will) far before Iran develops a nuclear bomb. It's not like building it is an overnight process. It takes months at least, and I'm sure Israel will have adequate fore-warning to deal with it.
 

JOHNYJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
567
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
It has been whispered for decades that Israel has a, DOOMSDAY SYSTEM .Where in, if it ever looked like she was going to be over run by the Arabs . She would launch enough nuclear rockets to destroy the entire Arab world.The ultimate meaning of NEVER AGAIN !
 

Deegan

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
2
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I think they should act now, especially after the threats from Irans own president, they waged war that day. Do the world a favor, and nuke their weapons sites now, they have every reason to do so.
 

M14 Shooter

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
68
Location
Toledo-ish OH
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
-4- people dont think Israel should strike back?

Why?
 

Deegan

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
2
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
M14 Shooter said:
-4- people dont think Israel should strike back?

Why?
Anti-semitics, it's a world wide problem.
 

M14 Shooter

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
68
Location
Toledo-ish OH
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Deegan said:
Anti-semitics, it's a world wide problem.
I wonder how many of the "no" votes would agree that Iran should strike back with nuclear weapons if Israel were to nuke them first.
 

Deegan

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
2
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
M14 Shooter said:
I wonder how many of the "no" votes would agree that Iran should strike back with nuclear weapons if Israel were to nuke them first.
I'm sure they would say Iran should nuke them, anyone who says a nuked country should "turn the other cheek" is either insane, or hateful.:roll:
 

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,319
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Well I wouldn't ALWAYS be in favor of responding to a nuclear attack with nukes, if conventional weapons could accomplish the same goals. But I just don't see any way that it would be possible for Israel to respond to a nuclear attack with conventional weapons before being wiped off the map, because it's so small.
 

Connecticutter

Active member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
432
Reaction score
0
Location
New Haven, CT
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Kandahar said:
Well I wouldn't ALWAYS be in favor of responding to a nuclear attack with nukes, if conventional weapons could accomplish the same goals. But I just don't see any way that it would be possible for Israel to respond to a nuclear attack with conventional weapons before being wiped off the map, because it's so small.
I think that if Israel were nuked it would already be almost wiped off the map. They could launch a counterstrike, but there would be nothing left to defend. I think if Iran did this it would cause us to go there like we did in Afghanistan and Iraq.

That being said, I don't think the Iranians would do this. Their leaders know that if they dropped a nuke, a retribution will follow.
 

FinnMacCool

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
2,272
Reaction score
153
Location
South Shore of Long Island.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Israelis can do whatever the hell they want but if they get nuked, its their fault for not stopping it. I mean if they get nuked a whole bunch of innocents will die. But if they retaliate a whole bunch of innocents will die. Its pretty ****ed up ****.

Nuclear weapons are the worst invention we've ever come up with. If it wasn't for nuclear weapons, I might think world peace would be easier to accomplish but I think, for the sake of humanity, we need to keep everyone from building and using nukes. Everyone. We're not excluded in this.
 

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,319
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Connecticutter said:
I think that if Israel were nuked it would already be almost wiped off the map. They could launch a counterstrike, but there would be nothing left to defend. I think if Iran did this it would cause us to go there like we did in Afghanistan and Iraq.

That being said, I don't think the Iranians would do this. Their leaders know that if they dropped a nuke, a retribution will follow.
The rationality of the Iranian government is at least a subject of debate. The president called for wiping Israel off the map, and one of the ayatollahs has said that it would be worth it to nuke Israel (knowing full well that it would be the end of his government), because such a trade would kill a significant portion of the world's Jews but only a small portion of the world's Muslims.
 

teacher

DP Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
5,980
Reaction score
30
Location
Nomad.Got a couch,beer,meat,cute daughters,Batman
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
M14 Shooter said:
In the news today, we see a story regarding how close the Iranians are to a nuclear weapon.

One of the greatest concerns regarding a nuclear-capable Iran is that they will use their nuke(s) against Israel.

If Iran were to nuke Israel, would you support or oppose an Israeli nuclear response? Why?
Been saying this for as long as I've been a member of this site. Israel will destroy the Iranian plant soon. They can't afford not to. Iran will use the plant to make material to make a nuke. They will use said nuke on Isreal. Directly or through terrorists. We all know this. Isreal is not going to sit around and wait for it. It is the only logical thing for them to do. Gotta love the Jews when it comes to these things. They don't dick around with this *****. Would you?
 

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,319
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
If Israel is going to strike, now would be the time to do it. Recent reports indicate that America's worst fears may be coming true. Iran is well ahead of schedule to produce a nuclear weapon, and may have one as early as next spring, instead of being a few years away as was previously thought.
 

JOHNYJ

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
567
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
RE : FinnMacCool # 20
Doesn't matter there are no innocents.Hitler was elected chancellor of Germany all Germanywas responsible for him. The nut case that runs Iran was elected,all Iranians are responsible for him.
I understand the Israeli plan completley, You may destroy us ,but we will take you with us.Its the old mutualy assured destruction in a diferent form.
 
T

The Real McCoy

JOHNYJ said:
The nut case that runs Iran was elected
Iran's "elections" are highly questionable.


JOHNYJ said:
all Iranians are responsible for him.
Does that mean all Americans are responsible for Bush?
 
Top Bottom