Is that irony - or are you serious?Trump says it's a genius move......so i guess it's ok
I've replied twice and don't intend to go for three.
I have no idea why we invaded Iraq, but it has nothing to do with Ukraine.
Maybe when you posted this, back in Feb. but I'd say now that he has risen to the War Crimes Level.He is initiating a war of aggression, yes.
I'm not sure how elevating it to the Nuremberg level accomplishes much, though.
History will decide if attacking Afghanistan because a criminal was hiding inside it's borders was justified or not.Only if the invasion of Iraq ( 2nd), the bombing of Libya and change of government, the bombing, invasion of Syria are as well.
The first invasion of Iraq was justified, so was the invasion of Afghanistan so they would not fall under a crime against humanity
If you agree with Drumpf.Trump says it's a genius move......so i guess it's ok
It was allegedly about WMD.s which Joe Wilson said was wrong, so they exposed his wife, CIA agent Valeri Plume. Some say it was because Daddy Bush didn't finish the job.I have no idea why we invaded Iraq, but it has nothing to do with Ukraine.
I mean, I guess under the Nuremberg principles. But all Nuremberg was was a excuse to hang people we didn’t like and defeated in a war. So as long as you don’t lose Nuremberg doesn’t matter.For the purposes of this poll we can use the Nuremberg definition of a Crime Against Humanity:
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."