I won't necessarily cheer, but I will support it. From the data we have, the number executed who were later proven innocent pales in comparison to the number of innocent lives lost by murderers being set free and killing again.
Yeah they deserved to die...and I hope they burn in hell!
False dichotomy.
I could care less about cheering . .. I want to focus on "should you let a man who could afford but doesn't by health insurance die?"
I'd answer maybe. It depends on what the issue is - what are they dying from. A preventable disease that's costly to cure - but currable? A self inflicted condition related to obesity from overeating or alcohol consumption? Or something that's out of their control like a car accident or some such? If they CHOOSE not to do something and they KNOW the risks then they are CHOOSING those risks and are ACCEPTING what that means for them in their life.
But there's nothing wrong with giving aid and expecting to be paid for time, assistance and services rendered.
But let's not forget that the cost of medical care when up BECAUSE of the insurance industry gaining dominance. The cost rose because it COULD rise. So healthcare is so expensive BECAUSE of the insurance industry - not because people don't have insurance.
Tonight's and last week's debate brought up something interesting. Last week, the loudest applause of the night broke out when Brian Williams mentioned the executions of over 200 people in Texas. Tonight people shouted out "yes" to the question "should you let a man who could afford but doesn't by health insurance die?" For example, I agree that the death penalty is correct in some cases, but I do not believe that it is something to be triumphed. Rather, I believe it should only be used as a sort of regretful last resort. Something necessary, but not something to be proud of.
So, the question. Is it right to cheer for people's deaths, even if you agree that the person deserved it?
I agree with your post. I just think there is a difference between being happy that such a person is dead and being regretful that we had to let it happen. I wasn't arguing that the person without insurance should necessarily be treated. I wasn't arguing that the people in Texas didn't deserve to be executed, or that Osama bin Laden didn't deserve to die.
Well it's a guy suffering from lack of health insurance and Osama Bin Laden in one post about 'rooting for someone's death' . . . the two don't relate at all, for me, and I wouldn't be happy that anyone suffers anything and dies becaues of a lack of some printed green papers.
But Osama - yeah - I cheered and would do it again. He cheered when the towers fell - I only feel it's a matter of reciprocation. Anytime a filthy bastard bites teh dust it's one for the good guys.
Two completely different issues and they can't be answered with the same shred of thought from me.
There is not one person in this whole entire world whose death you would cheer? A serial killer, child rapist, mass murdering dictator?
I don't cheer death. I might feel relieved or even happy that someone died, but it isn't really because of their death as it is that their death means that they can no longer cause harm.
I would never cheer someone dying because they couldn't afford health insurance or medical care. That is just cruel and shows a lack of understanding for why people cannot afford medical treatment.
I am pro-capital punishment, but I don't cheer about how many people are executed due to that punishment. In fact, high statistics of the use of capital punishment is extremely sad to me because it shows that we are not doing enough to prevent people from reaching that point where we need to use capital punishment.
Good question. Were you glad for bin Laden's death? Did you cheer?
Let's hear your reasoning.
It's like I've given you the answer to a math equation. There's no question. Look at the quote and solve it.
Every stem of any political party has it's nutters . . . the democratic party has a lot in theirs - but they just haven't split off into their own group so they don't get the attention that some from the Tea Party has.
So... what's wrong with that?I say not over such grave topics. It's no different than saying, "we have killed 220,000 enemy combatants in this war!" and getting cheers out of that. You can say you are patriotic, you can say those people are the enemy, but in the end, no matter how you look at it, you just cheered about 220,000 people dying.
just what is there to rejoice over? .
what is going to change as a result?
it's not going to make someone we loved who has been taken from us magically reappear
God, if you can't cheer for the deaths of your enemies, then what's the point in even having them? Just don't cry like a bitch when they're cheering at your funeral.
My big problem with the people cheering and dancing in the streets is that they were the same people all butthurt about the people cheering and dancing on September 12th.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?