• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is everyone a little bit gay?

tessaesque said:
You have not only repeated yourself, but you have incorrectly repeated yourself at least 10 times during the course of this thread. Posting "the wheels on the bus" over and over again makes no point. Likewise, insulting and degrading and flat out IGNORING valid points does you no good.

You have presented yourself to be uneducated, narrowminded, and flat out ignorant to reality. You have decided that your very personal preferences are more important than anybody elses. You ignore facts, you use words that don't even exist within the English language, and you still refuse to provide any empirical evidence to support your claims regarding:

"unnatural rights"
"superior rights"
how gays are demanding "superior rights"
how them living next door to you, in the privacy of their own home is perverted or offensive to you
how them merely living at all is perverted or offensive to you
why the existence of homosexuality is unaccept ("unnatural" doesn't cut it, particularly because your definition of "unnatural" - as sparse and incomprehensible as it was - would make things like red hair, freckles, left handedness, twins, and every other minority inferior to the "majority"

So, out of frustration and recognition of the inability to argue with the perpetually ignorant - particularly those who refuse to even try to learn - I will no longer respond to your nonsensial, irrational, poorly constructed posts.

I wish you well in your narrow-mindedness. And when reality hits you square in the balls I hope your recovery is a quick one.
Click to expand...

Good post... Unfortunately, you probably wasted your time writing it. His response will just be rambling on about slippery slopes and unnatural rights some more...
 
winston53660 said:
I hope that is is not a poly rayon blend. Because wearing blended fabrics is a sin!!
Click to expand...

The bible is right about poly rayon. It's a sin. It's cheap, shiny and it sticks like thin plastic. If you wear poly rayon, stop it. Have some self respect.


I should add, poly rayon is a unnatural and slippery.
 
Last edited:
Bruce said:
That it has existed throughout all of recorded history is pretty good proof that it is natural.
Click to expand...

Air conditioning is not natural and therefore an abomination!
 
as if said:
Oh please....

You call someone's disapproval of public endorsement of gay criminal?

You are pulling the usual agenda driven stance. I CAN SAY IT AND USE IT YOU CANNOT !!!!!!

Science? explain your defense

Someone wants to claim it is gay when two animals hump, mere observations shows there is NOT, there is not even an errection!

Defend your I can you cannot to supposrt facts in the same argument.
Click to expand...

Let me ask you a question. Would you ever seek to criminalize being disabled? No? Why not? They are a certain way and they cannot help it. Gay people are exactly the same. How can somebody be against gay rights and justify it morally? How can somebody justify morally, taking away people's rights because they are born a particular way? It just cannot be done.

Your stance is not a moral one; it is immoral, anti-constitution and against every value we hold dear to our hearts in the West - the only slither of real hope and freedom on this planet.

You really are clueless.
 
Last edited:
as if said:
Gay is unnatural get over it, it is a minority of ppl involved in sexual deviations from the NATURAL male-female sexual relastionships. No free tride cuz you say so.

Slippery slope LOOK IT UP , IT IS NOT AS YOURSTAR, YOU, AND ANYONE ELSE WANT IT SO THAT IT WILL SUIT YOUR NEEDS AGAIN FOR ALL WHO INSIST ONE WAY IS OK (no different from trying to claim normal sexual behavior is relevant to yours or any other sexual behavior that is NOT natural... that's right, I know well that it is part of the enchalada, is indicative of what you can or should be able to do) BUT ANYTHING ELSE ... AND MOST NOTABLY A COUNTER STATMENT IN THE SAME VIEN AS YOURS IS NOT OK GROW UP
Click to expand...

You obviously have not idea how to define the term "natural"... but tell you what... give it a try.

Tell us what is the definition of "natural".
 
Thorgasm said:
Air conditioning is not natural and therefore an abomination!
Click to expand...

As an enviro, I'm gonna have to go with the bible on that one too.
 
DaveFagan said:
continuation
one twin has to be exactly the same for the co-twin if genetics causes the sexual

orientation. As in the Australian study, this is not the case, as this quote from the

Hershberger study reveals.

For men, depending on the criterion used, the prevalence of homosexuality

ranges for 1.06% to 3.24%, with an average of 2.49%; for women, the

range is from.55% to 2.11%, with an average of 1.68%. If combined with

bisexuality, the average rises to 4.57% for men and 3.26% for women.

These rates of homosexuality are very similar to those found in studies

using probability samples conducted in the United States and elsewhere(4

of 9 in 2 of 3).

The Hershberger study also states; "Specifically, significant genetic effects were

found for self-identified female homosexuality, but not for male homosexuality, in both

the twin and extended family analyses."(5 of 9 in 2 of 3) The questionnaire used for this

study is included (6 of 7 and 7 of 7 in 3 of 3), and the question of gay parents is not

included, causing the same potential flaws as indicated for the Australian study.

In the case of monozygotic twins, any marker that does not match is the deviation.

The deviation should be measured against 100%, meaning the further away from 100%

(which is the expected match), the greater the proof that the factor is not genetic. If twins

do not have the same eye color, they are not monozygotic, meaning no 100% gene match.

Does this statement sufficiently dramatize genetic correlation?

The factual conclusions do not support a link between genetics and

homosexuality. Many institutions have attempted to stand on high moral ground by

giving generous interpretations of minimal statistical data implying genetic

homosexuality. The data should be overwhelming, if true, in a monozygotic twin study,

most certainly not a minimal statistic. The ABCNEWS.com special, "Nurture, Not

Nature" concludes that a sense of humor is not genetic (1). Overall happiness: however,

is genetic as acknowledged by Simonen et al (1998). Asa reminder, referring to Emma

Wilson's, "Textuality and (homo) Sexuality in Tournier's Les Meteores" to acknowledge

the psychological inferences, in this case, narcissism, regarding homosexuality might be

enlightening (9 of 9). The backlash caused by the historical overreaction to

homosexuality is analogous to affirmative action. Do the words, "too much of a good

thing," strike a responsive chord here?













Works Cited

Alarcon, Maricela, DeFnries, J. C, and Light, Jacquelyn Gillis. "A Twin Study of

Mathematics Disability Journal ofLearning Disabilities. Nov/Dec 1997. 617-23.

Cameron, Paul, and Cameron, Kirk. "Did the APA Misrepresent the Scientific Literature

to Courts in Support of Homosexual Customers Journal of Psychology- May

1997. 313-32.

Cameron, Paul, and Cameron, Kirk. "Homosexual Parents". Adolescence. Winter 1996.

757-76.

Colt, George Howe. "Were You Born That Way?". Life. April 1998. 38-42.

Hershberger, Scott L. "A Twin Registry Study of Male and Female Sexual Orientation".

The Journal of Sex Research. 1997. 212-22.

Jones, Stanton L. "The Incredibly Shrinking Gay Gene". Christianity Today. Oct. 1999.

53.

Shapiro, Joseph P. "Kids With Gay Parents". U.S. News & World Report. Sept. 1996. 75-

6.

Simonen, Riitta L, Videman, Tapio, and Battie, Michele C. "The Effect of Lifelong

Exercise On Psychomotor Reaction Time: a Study of 38 Pair of Male

Monozygotic Twins. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Sept. 1998.

1445-50.

Sloan, Irving J. "Homosexual Conduct and the Law". Ed. Irving J. Sloan. Oceana

Publications. London/Rome/New York. 1987.

Viegas, Jennifer. "Nature, Not Nurture". ABCNE WS. com. April 14, 2000.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/DailyNews/twinhumorOO0414.html.

Wilson, Emma. "Textuality and (homo)Sexuality in Tournier's Les Meteores". Romanic

Review. Jan. 1995. 115-27.
Click to expand...

Anything that cites Paul Cameron can be summerily dismissed as non-credible.
 
as if said:
I dont care what you believe my rights are. One of them is Free speach, another is freedom from predatory behaviors. Another is a right to an opinon. (as well as expressing it.. IE freespeach)

Play with someone else
Click to expand...

1) No one is saying you have no right to free speech. But you do not have the right to not be offended. Don't like people being gay, or being gay in the open? TOO BAD. It's really that simple.

2) No, I think I'll play with you. You obviously are misinformed on the issue, so I will attempt to educate you. Let's see if you get it.
 
Women shaving their legs is unnatural!
 
Thorgasm said:
Women shaving their legs is unnatural!
Click to expand...

According to him, having sex and not reproducing is unnatural... so birth control and condoms are an abomination.
 
tessaesque said:
Oh h*ll no. I live in Texas. I am not giving up my air conditioning for anybody, ever.
Click to expand...


I live in Dallas too. No need for AC today but August will be here soon enough!
 
winston53660 said:
I live in Dallas too. No need for AC today but August will be here soon enough!
Click to expand...

Do you remember the summer of '07? Abnormally cool and rainy straight through the beginning of July, then a HUGE temperature spike and massive humidity through October?

I think we're going to duplicate this year.
 
SheWolf said:
According to him, having sex and not reproducing is unnatural... so birth control and condoms are an abomination.
Click to expand...

Not an abomination, but it does put a barrier between you.
 
tessaesque said:
Do you remember the summer of '07? Abnormally cool and rainy straight through the beginning of July, then a HUGE temperature spike and massive humidity through October?

I think we're going to duplicate this year.
Click to expand...

Global warmin be happenin peeps. Time to invest in the A/C industry. :mrgreen:
 
People im trying to look for a song but i dont know its name. it goes something like "la la la" dum dum "la la". any ideas?
 
tessaesque said:
Do you remember the summer of '07? Abnormally cool and rainy straight through the beginning of July, then a HUGE temperature spike and massive humidity through October?

I think we're going to duplicate this year.
Click to expand...


Yeah it has been an odd so far like that. Up into the 90's then boom down to the 60's
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom