What would you use to come back at some pathetic conspiracy theory? Seriously the idea that the type of people that voted for Trump wherever the type of people that had an issue with gay people is really kind of funny to me.Haha.. snark is such a satisfying snack coming from you.
I was 13 and 1996.
But is that based on a true understanding of these people or a convenient dismissal?
So when you make reference to people that I'm riding with, what are you talking about? Are you talking about Christian nationalists or lizard people or the Illuminati what?
Okay my mistake, (don't worry I know it's incredibly smug for me to admit my mistake) who do you think I'm riding with?
Okay I made an assumption and I was wrong there's no need to harp on it like this.
If you weren't referring to a political movement I don't know what you referring to. Again I apologize for assuming.
So we've gotten past the point where I made an assumption and it was apparently incorrect.That's what this lame tactic suggests anyway.... wanna give your post another go?
I was never involved or part of any ass kicking time on Saturday night in 1996 that you can win reference to on post number 253.
You elaborate on these mysterious folks I ride with that again you referenced in post 251 and then maybe I'll clear something up because I don't know what you're talking about.
Do you spend a lot of time thinking about gay men?
Yeah it's kind of strange that there seems to be this idea that convert someone into or out of homosexuality by the fact that they're outward appearance attractive
Not an apt comparison IMO. My take on this is mostly the penis into the male anus, and females not wanting to procreate with men thing. And before you ask, no, I am not religious. Strictly biological perspective.
Who said anything about banning gay sex? To each their own.
Of course.
Well I'm not 100% sure that it's not wanting to procreate it's not being capable of it.
I'm not offended or personally invested in this just so you know I'm a homosexual man myself.
It is somewhat uncommon, but that does not mean it is unnatural.
I get what he's saying he's suggesting it's unnatural because it can't possibly lead to procreation but there's a lot of human sexual behavior that doesn't. I like to believe that there's more to it biologically and just procreation. It's too establish a Pair bondto become close. Just like if you were to kiss or hold your wife or girlfriend or vice versa. These things cannot lead to procreation but they help you is establish of Pair bond and I think that that's natural.
You lumped everyone on the left together. So it's only natural to use "we"
So is wearing glasses or clothes.
No, you can't. You can't because you are already starting from the belief that it is unnatural, which is completely wrong and unscientific. You can find anything gross, but it seems highly suspect if you find someone else's relationships "gross" and feel the need to speak about it.
All words are made up.
Did they teach you about Julius Caesar in American schools? They taught me here that he was Governor of a province called 'Transalpine Gaul', Gaul on the other side of the Alps, called that to differentiate it from 'Cisalpine Gaul', Gaul on this side of the Alps.
Who said anything about speaking about it? I'm talking about having a belief. I can have my beliefs about homosexuality, and still not treat homosexuals any differently than I do anyone else I know and work with. As a matter of fact, one of my favorite employees is gay. And I actually threw a customer out of my store and trespassed him for calling that employee the F word. I have family members who are gay and I love them and treat them the same as any other member. You can have beliefs and at the same time not pass judgement or prothstelize. Pretty easy.
Sounds like then that you don't actually find them "gross", but for some reason feel the need to claim it.
