Well this is a lie:
CBS4 News Exclusive: Trump Denies Ties To Russia
Republican nominee Donald Trump flatly denied any ties to the Russian government or Russian investors.www.cbsnews.com
Kremlin says Russian experts met with Trump staff; campaign denies it
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted as saying that "there were contacts" with influential people in Donald Trump's circle.www.nbcnews.com
Face the Nation Transcript December 18, 2016: Conway, Kissinger, Donilon
This is the December 18, 2016 transcript for Face the Nation. Guests included Kellyanne Conway, Henry Kissinger, Tom Donilon, Margaret Brennan, David Ignatiius, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Graeme Wood, Susan Page and Ron Brownstein.www.cbsnews.com
Mike Pence denies contact between Trump campaign and Russia
Pence rejected the notion that Trump's campaign or its associates communicated with Russian officials during the presidential campaign.www.nbcnews.com
Timeline: Trump and associates denied Russia involvement at least 20 times
In the 13 months after three of Donald Trump’s closest advisers met with a Russian lawyer, the Trump camp consistently denied collusion with Russiawww.theguardian.com
Why are you posting lies?
Donald Trump was not President in 2016.
Why are you posting lies?
I'm sure English is not your first language, but the thing you just said here actually hurts your position.
Imagine having such shitty integrity that you would try to pretend that Clinton was impeached for sexual harassment and not lying under oath and suborning perjury...THEN trying to justify your hatred of Trump when knowing good and well you eagerly voted for Clinton and his scumbag wife. Imagine ignoring the allegations of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and even rape but then pissing yourself because of someone else's character.
You have shit for credibility.
Not unless they have good reason. Trumps impeachments were unfair but two wrongs don't make a right in this circumstance. It just sets an awful precedent.
It's called reality. You ought to try joining us in it.Trump's two impeachments didn't go far enough. If Obama had committed the same acts your ilk would be screaming bloody murder.
Seriously what ****ing alternate universe do you people live in.
Imagine knowing you mindlessly support such a tremendous piece of shit that covered for 4 decades of her husbands sexual attacks by attacking his victims, and your only defense of your support of that piece of shit is to shriek "TTTTRRRUUUUUMMMMMPPPPP!!!!!"At least Hillary testified under oath while COWARD Trump supporters don't demand the same of Trump. Trump supporters are the biggest terrorists to America.
That's just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet, Harry Reid used the nuclear option and the Republicans paid the democrats a knock out punch in the Supreme Court
YepThat's just the beginning you haven't seen anything yet, Harry Reid used the nuclear option and the Republicans paid the democrats a knock out punch in the Supreme Court
A veteran Trump hater and a besotted Obama lover walked into a bar........................Trump's two impeachments didn't go far enough. If Obama had committed the same acts your ilk would be screaming bloody murder.
Seriously what ****ing alternate universe do you people live in.
Dereliction of duty on the Southern Border.On what charges?
Dereliction of duty on the Southern Border.
Failure to fully implement and enforce Immigration Law as written.
I was only commenting on what some potential charges might be. Personally I dont think impeachment is going to happen even if the Democrats lose their majority.Sounds great. Good luck and let us know how it turns out.
I wouldn't have to repeat them if you'd just craft an honest post.Repeating your already disproven points really makes you less the sly fox and more the dull bird.
So you admit you were wrong?Nobody on this thread, dull bird.
But it 100% bears on whether his campaign colluded with Russia, so members of the campaign meeting with Russians are not "presidential affairs", as you falsely claimed.And nothing Trump may have done in 2016 bears on his actions as President
Aww, your fallacy of Moving the Goalposts is so cute. But it's not effective.unless you can muster actual evidence of conspiracy
They will certainly try.'No question' a Republican House will impeach Joe Biden: CNN legal analyst
During a Monday morning appearance on CNN's "New Day," legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin told host Brianna Keilar that he has no doubt in his mind that a Republican-majority House of Representatives will attempt to impeach President Joe Biden if they take control after the midterm election.As part of...www.rawstory.com
Many on the Right see Trump's impeachment as unfair persecution of an innocent man.
Given that they take back the House, should they impeach Biden for retribution?
I wouldn't have to repeat them if you'd just craft an honest post.
Craft the honest post which says that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia and I won't have to repeat the truth. But that's the thing about the truth...sometimes you have to repeat it over and over because the truth never changes.
So admit the truth and we can be done. Or admit that you have no intention of telling the truth and we can be done that way.
So you admit you were wrong?
But it 100% bears on whether his campaign colluded with Russia, so members of the campaign meeting with Russians are not "presidential affairs", as you falsely claimed.
So do you admit the Trump campaign colluded with Russia?
Aww, your fallacy of Moving the Goalposts is so cute. But it's not effective.
We're not talking about criminal conspiracy right now. We're talking about collusion, which as your own source said in proving you wrong, can be either legal or illegal, depending on the nature of the collusion.
So are you finally going to do the honest thing and admit the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in 2016?
It's called reality. You ought to try joining us in it.
I did. And you agreed that Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort secretly met with Russian officials to get information on Clinton. That's collusion.If you know the truth then you must be able to cite evidence.
If you're incapable of having a discussion where you actually address the things being discussed, why are you here? We can talk about Ukraine, but let's have you admit to collusion with Russia in the 2016 election first.That’s what I asked you for when i first addressed you and you’re still saying, “Duh duh, Trump musta been asking for phony investigation cause My Lord Schumer said so.”
See above. Let's get you to admit to collusion first and then we'll have a better framework to discuss Ukraine.Yeah, like Trump would not have known that any investigation he elicited from Ukraine would not be picked over by the corrupt MSM. He wanted to expose the real manipulations of the DNC and that’s the real reason the Dems went postal, as even those not directly involved in DNC conspiracies would not want their party’s dirt on display.
This is a lie. I never used the word criminal. You did that. Whether they were criminal in nature or not is not the point I was ever making (though, as an aside, the Mueller team definitely said the Trump Tower meeting was in the ballpark for criminal acts, they just didn't know if they could prove Don Jr. was smart enough to know he was breaking the law).I admit that your citations were fatuous because no one here claimed that meetings did not take place. What you’re unable to prove is that those meetings can be construed as the criminal collusion you claimed of them.
I did. And you agreed that Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort secretly met with Russian officials to get information on Clinton. That's collusion.
If you're incapable of having a discussion where you actually address the things being discussed, why are you here? We can talk about Ukraine, but let's have you admit to collusion with Russia in the 2016 election first.
See above. Let's get you to admit to collusion first and then we'll have a better framework to discuss Ukraine.
This is a lie. I never used the word criminal. You did that. Whether they were criminal in nature or not is not the point I was ever making (though, as an aside, the Mueller team definitely said the Trump Tower meeting was in the ballpark for criminal acts, they just didn't know if they could prove Don Jr. was smart enough to know he was breaking the law).
Stop with the strawman. I only said that the Trump team colluded with Russia in 2016. You're the only one who brought up criminal collusion, which is not even a thing (collusion can be criminal acts, but only under other statutes, such as conspiracy, aiding and abetting, etc.).
Stop posting lies and admit the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in 2016. And then we can discuss how that fits in the Ukraine discussion.
How did he violate his oath of office on the border?Actually failure to carry out his oath of office at the border is enough, but we could find more.
Mental incompetence is a 25th amendment issue. What corrupt financial dealings?Sure there is, on two grounds:
1. Mental incompetence.
2. Corrupt financial dealings.
LOL! Defending the indefensible.Nope, secret meetings are not criminal collusion, and that’s what you mean every time you misuse the word.
You couldn’t prove criminal intent in the Ukrainian phone call before I brought up the Dems’ corrupt collusion narrative, so it’s no surprise you’re still dodging the original subject of this thread.
More attempts by you to dodge the fundamental question until you think you can control the discussion. Usual Mad Lib hysteria.
And next you try to invalidate an actual lawyer’s distinction, that of the benign and criminal forms of collusion, in favor of drivel that you attribute to that hack Mueller. I don’t suppose you have handy the actual quote you paraphrased, just so everyone reading can see how far from “truth” your posts are? Not that it’s necessary after you’ve shown your complete indifference to the concept of evidence.
At this point, you know that I never said one way or another about criminality. I only spoke of collusion.Nope, secret meetings are not criminal collusion, and that’s what you mean every time you misuse the word.
At this point, you know that I never said one way or another about criminality. I only spoke of collusion.
Why do you continue posting this lie? Are you really that scared to admit that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia? All you have to do is admit the truth, and you won't do that. I guess defending Russia with lies is more important to you than the truth.
LOL! Defending the indefensible.
Imagine if you actually had something to be angry about. It certainly was not the G.O.P. hacks, "investigating" their own "neo-fuhrer"
Justice Dept. Never Fully Examined Trump’s Ties to Russia, Ex-Officials Say (Published 2020)
The former deputy attorney general maneuvered to keep investigators from completing an inquiry into whether the president’s personal and financial links to Russia posed a national security threat.www.nytimes.com Justice Dept. Never Fully Examined Trump’s Ties to Russia, Ex-Officials Say
August 30, 2020
"The former deputy attorney general maneuvered to keep investigators from completing an inquiry into whether the president’s personal and financial links to Russia posed a national security threat...
...But law enforcement officials never fully investigated Mr. Trump’s own relationship with Russia, even though some career F.B.I. counterintelligence investigators thought his ties posed such a national security threat that they took the extraordinary step of opening an inquiry into them. Within days, the former deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein curtailed the investigation without telling the bureau, all but ensuring it would go nowhere..."
https://www.esquire.com › news-politics › politics › a33848359 › rod-rosenstein-trump-russia-b-robert-mueller
Rod Rosenstein Stopped Robert Mueller Investigating Trump's Financial ...
Aug 31, 2020 Rod Rosenstein Didn't 'Land the Plane.' He Made Sure It Never Left the Ground. The New York Times reports t he former deputy attorney general instructed Special Counsel Robert Mueller not to...
https://trumpfile.org › a-g-rosenstein-secretly-tells-mueller-not-to-investigate-trumps-finances
A.G. Rosenstein secretly tells Mueller not to investigate Trump's finances
May 18, 2017 A.G. Rosenstein secretly tells Mueller not to investigate Trump's finances Filed In Investigations Robert Mueller Trump Administration Previous article Robert Mueller is appointed as Special Council in the Russia investigation Next article Whistleblower Reality Winner is arrested for releasing report on Russian interference
https://news.yahoo.com › mueller-didnt-investigate-trumps-finances-110846598.html
Mueller didn't investigate Trump's finances or question Ivanka Trump ...
Sep 22, 2020 Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian election interference and President Trump's 2016 campaign treated Trump's family and personal finances with kid gloves, mostly out of...
https://www.vanityfair.com › news › 2020 › 08 › why-didnt-mueller-fully-investigate-trumps-russia-ties
Why Didn't Mueller Fully Investigate Trump's Russia Ties?
Aug 31, 2020 according to an excerpt published sunday by the times, rod rosenstein, who was then overseeing the probe, directed mueller in 2017 to investigate only moscow's election interference and potential...
All the deals his son was doing in his name that benefited him as well and vice versa.Mental incompetence is a 25th amendment issue. What corrupt financial dealings?
Like we had under Trump! *wink*There is plenty reason to do so but they shouldn't because we need to stop the cycle and try to get back to normal, stable, government.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?