- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
scottyz said:Bush specifically cut funding that was going towards making the levee's handle this type of hurricane. The funds he cut went to Iraq. Republicans control all three branches of Gov. last time I check so there is no "other side".
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050901/pl_nm/weather_katrina_funding_dc
http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=32144&dcn=e_tma
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4200/is_20050606/ai_n14657367#continue
http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2004-09-28/cover_story.html
http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2004-10-05/commentary.html
http://www.japantoday.com/e/?content=news&cat=8&id=348096
BUSH cut funding? Last time I read the constitution, Congress had the power of the purse. If you're mad at congress, be mad at congress. Don't take it out on the president.
And what do you mean, there is no other side? Everyone NOT from LA wanted the funds cut. Know why? It's called pork barrel politics. You try convincing the senators from North Dakota that their money should pay for LA's flood protection. What ever happened to state's rights and responsibilities? Since when did it become a FEDERAL responsibility to micromanage the lives of people living in every state. Shouldn't LA have handled this? If they didn't have the money, raise taxes to pay for it. It's what NYC did after 9/11 to pay for the rebuilding, so why couldn't LA have done it before the hurricane?
:rofl You have so little to back yourself up that you're dragging Hillary and Kerry into this. Pathetic. In case you're not aware Bush doens't listen to either of them and the have their own states to run.
In case you're not aware, the point is that nobody was disagreeing with Congress (not Bush), when Congress decided to cut the funds. The bill passed with a majority in both houses, with backing from everyone from Bush to the NYT. So to cry foul only on bush is simple partisan rhetoric.
LA national guard REQUESTED the return of a equipment a month prior.
http://abc26.trb.com/news/natguard08012005,0,4504131.story
Did you READ YOUR OWN ARTICLE??
"The National Guard needs that equipment back home to support the homeland security mission," said Lt. Colonel Pete Schneider with the LA National Guard.
Col. Schneider says the state has enough equipment to get by, and if Louisiana were to get hit by a major hurricane, the neighboring states of Mississippi, Alabama and Florida have all agreed to help.
The Col. said "We need that back," then two seconds later, said that EVEN IF a major hurricane hit, LA could get by. So what's the problem?
You should take your own advice.
Have any responses to anything else I posted? Any explanations as to why the mayor and governor did NOTHING? Any responses as to the proof that the only reason LA was evacuated when it was was because of BUSH, saving thousands of lives? Any response to the fact that the people complaining abuot the job not being done are the very people failing to do the job?
Or are you just picking and choosing?