- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 13,156
- Reaction score
- 1,038
- Location
- melbourne florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
From your article:
He's quite right. but remember, the documents have already been produced and eximined, and put on the web. So, refer to the statement I quoted.
The long form needed for legal things has not been produced
People speak off the top of the head, sometimes unwisely and silly. But the evidence has been produced, that can't be changed. And nothing he has said changes that.
Yes, and as President of the United States I'm sure Obama had to go through a lot of "Legal things" in order to become President. Which would mean that someone along the way must have seen or examined or found his BC and found it satisfactory. Which would mean it exists.
From your article:
'You're not going to convince those people because they have a political agenda, or they have minds that go in that kind of direction,' he told CNN. 'Conspiratorial theorists are never going to be satisfied. This has gone into another area of political attack.'
He's quite right. but remember, the documents have already been produced and eximined, and put on the web. So, refer to the statement I quoted.
Then where is it. As corrupt as the democrats are people may have been paid off
Which makes Abercrombie a complete dumbass for dredging all this up.
Well, I conceded earlier that SB75 had a good point regarding this issue. Thanks for showing me that it just doesn't make any difference to you what anyone on the right actually says.The fact that you still have doubts makes you a birther. You don't need to see the "long form" certificate. You already have proof.
About as dumb as anyone going with it. But let's face it, birthers don't need much.
The anti-birfers are just as bad, as we see with Abercrombie.
funny how no one was saying that back when the tards were bleating for Bush's national guard records.
The anti-birfers are just as bad, as we see with Abercrombie.
The anti-birfers are just as bad, as we see with Abercrombie.
There is a significant difference. Those who oppose birthers have this thing we call evidence on our side. You birthers have none.
Funny how most of us don't talk about Bush's record. Next irrelevant complain is?
of course you don't. if we talked about the idiocy of your side in the past, it would make your attacks on da birfers look hypocritical
I'm not a birfer and unless you can prove that I am, you need to stop lieing.
Wait, so if random Joe Blow makes a mindless complaint about Bush, that makes me a hypocrite for pointing out mindless attacks on Obama? Do you have any idea just how incredibly stupid that is? I mean, that is mind blowingly stupid.
Your not a birther, you just ask questions. Yes, we know how the excuses are made.
Wait, so if random Joe Blow makes a mindless complaint about Bush, that makes me a hypocrite for pointing out mindless attacks on Obama? Do you have any idea just how incredibly stupid that is? I mean, that is mind blowingly stupid.
Any evidence of that? Any at all?
Purdy much. It makes you into a trufer.
As much as for Obama's long form BC that is missing
He said the long form exists he can not find it. This means it may not exist and the other documents mean nothing without that form
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?