OhIsee.Then
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,581
- Reaction score
- 277
- Location
- MI and AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I am pretty sure at this point that my statement that Trayvon was wearing the white t-shirt was wrong.
So I retract it unless and until I can show it was correct.
I thought heard white t-shirt, when all I believe I heard now was, white t, which cut off and then continues with tennis shoes. The white t being part of white tennis shoes.
I am still having issues and have not even been able to review the whole video to see if it is on there.
So I apologize to all for taking the conversation that way with my wrong assertion.
Thankfully it isn't needed to prove it was Zimmerman on the ground yelling for help and being assaulted because of the other eye-witness report who was outside and saw it.
The Left media using dated photos of Martin as a 10-12 year-old when more current ones are available, downplaying Zimmerman's head injuries, the white hispanic instead of just hispanic, etc, etc
The only thing, we will probably agree on is.. Did the Zimmerman act wisely? Unequivocally, NO.
The bottom line is there any proof that he committed a crime? To be brutally honest...NO
Why would the kid attack Zimmerman? What would be his motivation?
Again, you are still incorrect. Zimmerman getting beaten doesn't given him the right to shoot Martin. Only if Martin attacked Zimmerman first. There is nothing to prove Zimmerman didn't attack first. But since Zimmerman had to catch up to Martin for Martin to even know he was there Zimmerman was asking by his actions for Martin to respond to him. He may have even put a hand on Martin to get him to stop so he could question him. So, you have no proof at all about who started the fight where Zimmerman was losing. But, the SYGL is written in a way to permit Zimmerman to murder Martin. Yes, the law permits murder. It's intended to, but they were only expecting the correct people would get killed. I'm just waiting for someone to demonstrate this by shooting Zimmerman. It shouldn't be too hard given Zimmerman’s history.
Again, you are still incorrect. Zimmerman getting beaten doesn't given him the right to shoot Martin.
The claim that Zimmerman is a racist is particular unfair and unjust.
Zimmerman is a Spanish speaking Latino and very much a minority in the predominantly African-American neighborhood. Commonly both whites and African-Americans in central Florida hold Latinos very negatively.
Zimmerman not only has African-American friends, but even African-American relatives. People who know him in the neighborhood and school have gone public scoffing at the claim that he's a racist. Many in that neighborhood have come forward saying it his polite, respectful and in no way a racist.
Neighbors describe watch leader at center of Florida investigation - CNN.com
That neighborhood's majority is African-American, though has whites and Latinos. Of the prior 46 911 calls - about 1 per week - there is no allegation that Zimmerman assaulted, detained, harassed, blocked or threatened anyone. I know in fact that 1 call per week for someone actively involved in neighborhood watch is a particularly LOW number.
Those 46 prior calls also support that Zimmerman is NOT someone who runs down African-Americans shoving, blocking or starting a fight. The police answering those calls could be called as witnesses to confirm the nature of the calls and whether any person complained of how Zimmerman treated them.
Increasingly, I think the EXTREME attempts to villify and even dehumanize Zimmerman is grossly unjust and unfair.
Using deadly force to protect yourself, or your family is justified. That being said, one has to be placed in fear of great bodily harm, and make the decision to use deadly force.
Self-defense isn't murder, there's that pesky requirement for something skin to malice aforethought or premeditation to go the murder route.
So what? Trayvon had every right to defend himself from someone following him in the dark.Thankfully it isn't needed to prove it was Zimmerman on the ground yelling for help and being assaulted because of the other eye-witness report who was outside and saw it.
You mean false statements like claiming Trayvon was kicking Zimmerman in the head? Those kinds of false statements?Every known fact and every eye-witness is consistent with what Zimmerman said at the time to the arriving police.
People speaking on behalf of Martin have freqently been proven to making false statements - and continued doing so.
Zimmerman being beaten down and Martin continuing to assault him, particularly noting a wound to the BACK of Zimmerman's head, does justify him using deadly force, since he clearly was unable to defend himself otherwise. NO ONE has to allow themselves to be continually beaten at risk of greater pain, greater risk of permanent disfigurement, permanent crippling injury, permanent brain damage or death.
Regardless of how it started, would YOU allow someone to just beat you to death if you could stop it with a weapon - or would you just conclude "I guess I am in someway responsible for how this started so he gets to do whatever he wants to me now or to beat me to death."
That is what your claiming? OR are you claiming that if anyone annoys you that YOU then get to beat that person to death? Are you REALLY arguing for YOUR right to assault people that bother you?
So what? Trayvon had every right to defend himself from someone following him in the dark.
I don't think racism factored into this, but if it did, I suspect the one motivated by racism and towards violence was Martin, not Zimmerman.
Initially, in the 911 call, Martin turned towards and approached Zimmerman glaring at him as he did, but seeing/hearing Zimmerman talking to the police, Martin turned and ran around the corner, but then according to the call to his girlfriend he stopped running.
Seeing Zimmerman no longer on the phone, he physically violently assault Zimmerman - a minority Latino on a majority African-American commmunity - and continued assaulting Zimmerman after slugging the chubby Latino minority old guy (to him) down to the ground.
I suspect that while Zimmerman was screaming for someone to help him, Martin was struggling with Zimmerman for the gun, who to that point had not displayed or drawn it. Yet that is one aspect of the struggle that would favor Zimmerman. Heavy people generally are slower and Zimmerman seems not particularly fit, but heavy people are strong from carrying their weight.
At that point I think it became only a question of which one died. If Martin could turn the gun on Zimmerman, Zimmerman dies. If Zimmerman could turn the pistol on Martin, Martin died.
Martin died.
This didn't happen because a civilian watchmen was doing what they do. It happened because Martin wanted to and believed he could beat the crap out of an pudgy older Latino guy who had called the police on him. I don't think race came into it, but if it did, it most likely Martin a racist against Latinos leading him to charge and assault Zimmerman.
Despite all the words claiming Martin was an angelic child with his Skittles, that he attacked Zimmerman and continued assaulting him (according to TWO eye witnesses) shows he is anything but a sweet young 17 year old teen.
He could have just gone home or cursed Zimmerman out. But he could not beat the s...t out of Zimmerman as much and as long as he wanted to. Anyone who knows about fights knows its not like in the movies with no residuals. Fights leave people crippled, brain damaged and dead - whether deliberate or not. That Zimmerman had a wound on the back of his head, not just a slug in the nose, proved the assault of Martin was extremely violent and of life threatening natures.
We only have snippets of Zimmerman's statement's to police.Did zimmerman acknowledge speaking to Martin BEFORE walking back to his truck? Or any other indication that he had spoken to Martin at all prior to the release of the GFs conversation?
Because that's pretty relevant.
They spoke. "Why are you following me?" "What are you doing here?"
This exchange doesn't seem to be in zims story. This exchange HAD to have happened before thephysical confrontation.
I thought he said he got out to check a street name and was on his way back to his truck when he was attacked. How did he describe the conversation they cleary had? Did he mention it at all?
Something like "he asked me why I was following him and I asked over my shoulder "what are you doing here?" as I walked back to my truck and then he just attacked me from behind."
Haven't heard that he admitted speaking to Martin at all. And if he didn't, then his story slides down in credibility because he left out something he thought nobody knew, because he didnt know that Martin was on the phone at the time because he was using a headset.
Why are you saying there wasn't an investigation when clearly there was?it's actually quite difficult to come up with any proof when there is no police investigation,
No he hasn't.And that is that Zimmerman has been proven to be a violent parnoia wannabe who with HIS GUN killed an innocent kid just walking home talking to his girlfriend.
Zimmerman said he was calling for help. Another witness who was on the scene and not behind a window said it was Zimmerman calling for help.Not quite. One independent witness says she told the LEO that Martin was calling for help. The LEO corrected her and said, "No, that was Zimmerman."
Ok? And how long was the interview at the station, and was that properly done?He said "he peppered" Zimmerman with questions instead of asking him to tell his story. This is not police procedure. Questions are leading.
I don't think there is at all.Let's face it--there's enough question that this should go before a Grand Jury. And on April 10th, it will.
He wasn't going to his home, but why do you ask?A question I have that may have been discussed here and I missed. Was the most general direct route between 7/11 and 'home' thru the 'gated community'?
I agree with everything else you said in that post except the above.... the asshole goes free
You might want to revise what you said.It is called paranoia. What, he had a couple legit 911 calls but 90% were innocent people that Zimmerman just knew to be commiting crimes.
The evidence doesn't say that.This man is a danger to the community.
No, I am not.
Again, you are still incorrect. .
Which is what the evidence says happened.
Zimmerman getting beaten doesn't given him the right to shoot Martin. Only if Martin attacked Zimmerman first. .
Beside Zimmerman's statement saying otherwise, there is no evidence to say he did.
There is nothing to prove Zimmerman didn't attack first. .
In order to be attacked from behind. Trayvon would have had to be hidden from Zimmerman's view.
But since Zimmerman had to catch up to Martin for Martin to even know he was there Zimmerman was asking by his actions for Martin to respond to him. .
Zimmerman's history?
It shouldn't be too hard given Zimmerman’s history.
As far as I know, assault is not a defense.So what? Trayvon had every right to defend himself from someone following him in the dark.
Or...
Martin sees Zimmerman following him on foot and asks "why are you following me?"
To which Zimmerman replies "what are you doing here?"
Martin makes some dismissive "pfft" gesture and turns to leave.
At which point Zimmerman grabs him by his hoodie to hole him so THIS ONE DOESNT GET AWAY.
Martin freaks, whips around and cracks Zimmerman one in the face, with all the power a weight lifting, football playing, just got back from hanging out with his girl, followed in a strange neighborhood by a weird big fat guy, 17 year old can deliver.
And down goes Zimmerman on his back, body on some grass, head on the sidewalk.
So Zimmerman is laying on his back, stunned and in some pain, starts fumbling for his gun, SOMEBODY starts yelling, plausible reasons for both to do so, martin standing.
Gun comes out.
BANG!
Dead kid.
This narrative includes every piece of evidence we have, I believe.
It is FAR simpler than any of the others I've heard, and doesn't require acceptance of behavior for which there is no precedent.
And it could be completely wrong.
Time will tell and I can't wait to see what comes out of the investigation!
He was pissed that Zimmerman called the police on him? He's a racist against Latinos Because he's a punk? Because he is extremely rebellious (such as reason for his suspension.)? Because he's a gang-banger? Because he's a violent asshole? A bully who thinks he's a tough football player who can kick ass? Who knows?
What was the reason for Zimmerman to shoot Martin - other than Zimmerman violently assaulted him and continued to do so with Zimmerman on the ground screaming for help? Clearly all evidence shows that Zimmerman didn't have his gun out until then.
I understand why you WANT to hate and blame Zimmerman, but your side of this is falling apart - at least legally. The facts are what they are, and they are all breaking Zimmerman's way. Again, legally.
You can imagine what you think happened in the gaps of the unknowns, but all known facts are confirming Zimmerman's account. Almost all speculations made against Zimmerman that have become known are being proved wrong.
Do you still believe it was Martin yelling for help? An eye witness has stated it was Zimmerman.
Look, reality is what it is. I understand the injustices you oppose and I agree with most of those, I really do. BUT you can't make a specific instance prove what it doesn't.
A question I have that may have been discussed here and I missed. Was the most general direct route between 7/11 and 'home' thru the 'gated community'?
He was suspended for being tardy. Not for bad behaviour, not for drugs, not for fighting. For tardiness.Suspended for tardiness? He was on suspension? I didn't read that but from you just now. So the perfect child was on suspension for school basically for not following school rules that essentially all students do? How many times does a person have to be tardy to literally be suspended?
Not even if Martin attacked first. Martin was being followed by a stranger in dark as he was heading back to his father's fiance's home after going on a candy run. He had the right to defend himself and strike first. Zimmerman lost his case of self-defense when he decided to play cop and stalk Trayvon.Again, you are still incorrect. Zimmerman getting beaten doesn't given him the right to shoot Martin. Only if Martin attacked Zimmerman first.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?