No.Yes, it was on the 911 call.
Again, Zimmerman might have felt he could handle the problem. However, if the kid wasn't really scared and attacked Zimmerman, Zimmerman would be in the right to shoot the kid.
And the evidence says that is what he was trying to do. Keep him under observation until police arrived.I am not saying that Zimmerman didn't do what he thought was correct as NW by calling it in, but as someone who knows, and is friends with local law enforcement here in SC, and as one who holds a CWP, at the point where you make the call you, I would think observe, not confront, and let the police do their job.
As pointed out, Zimmerman thought Trayvon's actions were suspicious. That is a sufficient. Sufficient enough for the police to respond.Second, what exactly is the suspicious behavior again? Looking at houses as he walks out of the neighborhood? Wow, I guess he should have stared at the ground as he walked briskly out eh? God forbid that someone should pay attention to their surroundings...
I most definitely are relying on the facts of this incident that we know of.Well that changes everything, we had no idea you were there on the street during the confrontation.
It sounds as if you have been watching too many cop shows on tv.
You need to look at the facts instead of relying totally on what a perp says.
It is not unusual to tell the truth either, is it?It is not unusual for a defendent who has just killed somebody to change the story so that he is the victim.
If it is required by law, do you think it didn't?Did they even confiscate the pistol?
He wasn't playing vigilante. He was acting in his capacity as NW and was trying to keep the kid under observation until police arrived.No, what matters here is that he took it upon himself to play vigilante and a kid is dead as a result.
Why would the kid attack Zimmerman? What would be his motivation?
I think it has already been pointed out, but leaving your car is not starting anything.There is no doubt in my mind that Zimmerman "started it" -- when he elected to leave his car and follow this kid on foot. Whatever happened then's on him. He was STALKING him!
Actually, both co-sponsors said this:
Author of "stand your ground" law: George Zimmerman should probably be arrested for killing Trayvon Martin - Crimesider - CBS News
Yeah, not a really good site to post.Council of Conservative Citizens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
my friend, you just lost a ****load of legitimacy in this thread, by sourcing the Council of Conservative Citizens. They are a racist organization, notorious for supporting the Confederate flag, white nationalism, and white seperatism. They were formed by former-Segregationists.
yeah man, you messed up big time with this. Its now logical to conclude that your motivation in this issue is anti-black.
There is actual video at the above link."The guy on the bottom, who had a red sweater on, was yelling to me, 'Help! Help!' and I told him to stop, and I was calling 911," said the witness, who asked to be identified only by his first name, John.
John said he locked his patio door, ran upstairs and heard at least one gun shot.
"And then, when I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on the top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point."
Man shot and killed in neighborhood altercation
Yes, your describing one of the skillls someone will need to kill Zimmerman using the SYGL.
Does anybody actually know what time the incident occurred?yes, following someone in a car and then on foot, in the middle of the night and the rain, is pretty intimidating.
Martin was right to be in fear.
That's the case, right there. Just like Lozano, the Miami cop who failed to use self-defense as the excuse for shooting a motorcyclist who he claimed was trying to run him over after it was revealed in court that Lozano put himself into harms way by running out into the street to try and stop the motorcyclist.
You lose your right of self defense when you are the aggressor.
He wasn't "told" to do anything.Again, the police dispatcher (likely had Zimmerman's 50 plus call record in pulled up too) told Zimmerman not to handle the problem.
Lee, the police chief, said in a statement that the police dispatcher's "suggestion" to Zimmerman that he did not need to follow Martin "is not a lawful order that Mr. Zimmermann would be required to follow."
"Mr. Zimmerman's statement was that he had lost sight of Trayvon and was returning to his truck to meet the police officer when he says he was attacked by Trayvon," Lee said.
'Stand Your Ground Law' at center of Fla. shooting - Yahoo! News
Does anybody actually know what time the incident occurred?
You realize that their opinion doesn't matter, right?Actually, both co-sponsors said this:Author of "stand your ground" law: George Zimmerman should probably be arrested for killing Trayvon Martin - Crimesider - CBS News
Thank you, for the reply.I believe it was around 7 pm
I have no idea how anybody is hearing "punks". I listened for "punks" as well, but nothing in there even comes close to it. The words are completely different.
I accept that people are hearing different things. I just think the people hearing "punks" have hearing problems. My ears work and the video I posted had 4-5 different versions of the audio and it's pretty damn clear that a hard "c" is at the beginning followed by the "oo" sound followed by an "n" and an "s". That's just the reality. If you aren't even hearing the "oo" sound, then I think you have an ear problem quite frankly.They would sound completely different with clear audio and without the power of suggestion. IIRC I was the first on this string to point out the "coons" and suggest it implied racism in the crime, so I think you're going to have to accept that people are hearing different things because it's poor audio.
Yeah, not a really good site to post.
Did you bother to look at the information provided and it's source?
I ask because people tend to over-look the information when they don't like the site.
Here is what was linked to from it's source.
There is actual video at the above link.
Does anybody actually know what time the incident occurred?
He definitely didn't say punks.
I keep waiting for someone claiming that if the USA's Southern border had been secured long ago, this would never have happened - and how this sort of thing is what happens sooner or later when you let Latinos in.
Stormfront can claim this is another example of why racial segregation was a good thing and why White people, Black people, Brown people, and Red people should each be kept apart.
I see injection the race of both into this as what constitutes "racism" in an extremely negative sense. When all else fails, cry racist. I think it is racists him/herself who are the ones who see everyone and everything by people's race.
Imagine George Bush speaking out after a white kid was killed by a Hispanic or black kid.
"If I had a son, he'd look like him."
Can you imagine the media response to that?
Hypocrisy reigns supreme.
An “assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.detaining a person is an act of aggression, tailing him is not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?