A Danish research institute exposes the links the Turkish organization IHH had - TRCB
Obviously it should be banned.
That being said, I douibt Europe would ban it.
Israel has a lot to put up with, not least the united effort by gangs of communists and Islamics to keep the world hostile to it.
Well if we are just to be concerned about this, the UK should have cut off all ties with the USA when it's population or parts therof were openly financing the IRA and the State of Israel should never have been formed.
I haven't read the report yet and it is going to be some time before I can but I understand it is a bit ify and it states they have contacts with Al Qaeda which the US says is not the case.
If the IHH has ties with Hamas then by all means it should be banned.
We're not speaking here about a link to an organization that promotes the killing of animals for the sake of fur, but connections with an organization that promotes the killing of innocent civilians for the sake of political causes.
But once more, I can't see Europe banning such an organization. Hell would be frozen and pigs would be flying before Europe will ban it.
Hamas was elected and was wrong not to speak to Hamas.
You seem to have a soft spot for those who perpetuate violence if they think it necessary for their cause. Or at least think it a point of principle to treat them as legitimate counterparts in conference just to beg them to stop causing chaos. Their being in government is immaterial.
You are so tiresome, not only do you have to interrupt every thread with your BNP propaganda, you write things that are not even true. I suggest you have a look at the link where you are suggesting I am supporting violence. You will find I am at that moment calling them both children. You have a problem with me I know but please stop interjecting every time you meet me in threads with tripe that happened or rather did not happen in others. If you go on more about this in this thread I will report you. It is not allowed by forum rules to try and hijack threads.Again, erratic intuition appears to marshal your perception of the facts. I think I had to mention that to you before.
You'll find that you asked for comment on the European Jewish Congress wanting this Turkish Islamic terror umbrella group banned. The article YOU linked to mentioned jihad, Hamas and other terror groups. And the European Jewish Congress is known to be concerned with the Islamists' hatred of Israel and Jews in general.
-- What do people think about this?
-- I can't see Europe banning such an organization. Hell would be frozen and pigs would be flying before Europe will ban it.
I think it's interesting and would set a strange precedent. It would help if the EJC would clarify exactly which European body they are asking to ban the IHH.
There is no mechanism by which "Europe" can ban a group across every individual member country.
Turkey isn't part of the EU anyway so an EU ban would be equally meaningless - even if the EU Parliament could force each member country to ban a political group it probably wouldn't because that would be such a major infringement on each member countries sovereignty.
A Danish research institute exposes the links the Turkish organization IHH had - TRCB
Obviously it should be banned.
That being said, I douibt Europe would ban it.
Your link did not work for me but I am assuming that it is the same link as Don gave in the ME section. I have now had a look at the paper. The main argument against IHH here appears to be that they were helping Al Qaeda. As the US has said this is not the case, I do not find this has shown this is a terrorist group and the fact that it has given information which is not true loses it's credibility to me.
Certainly it gives truckloads of aid to places where Muslims are impoverised. I heard it started after the Bosnian war.
The IHH became a "terrorist group" once Israel fubared the flotilla raid. Before that no one had really heard of them. Not the first time the "terrorist" organisation has been thrown on one party in such a dispute... makes it more "legal" to go after them. Now showing actual evidence of any links is almost never presented with such accusations.
Heh, you're only making even more fun of yourself Pete, if that's even possible right now.
The Danish research institute report is from 2006.
and?
And that means you were completely wrong, once more.
Apparently you're so used to it that you do not even take it hard.
Besides that the rest of your comment has done nothing to discredit and/or cast doubt over the Danish institute for research's claims.
And in what way am I wrong?
What do people think about this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?