• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Earth Will Self-Correct BUT: We are gonna die

The Giant Noodle

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
7,332
Reaction score
2,011
Location
Northern Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Well we are all dead. DOOM!!!! :scared: See everyone in the afterlife :2wave:

It seems the wetter things are the more plague there will be.
A new study, conducted by Chinese and Norwegian scientists, seems to suggest a connection between wetter climates and larger outbreaks of plague, according to LiveScience. As a result, as climates become wetter, the more likely it is that plague can spread.
Luckily, the bacteria that causes plague can be treated with antibiotics.
From LiveScience:
A bacterium called Yersinia pestis, which is carried by rodents, is responsible for three types of plague: bubonic (also called Black Death), septicemic and pneumonic plague. Together, these illnesses have been responsible for the deaths of millions of people the world over, including an estimated third of Europe's population during the Middle Ages. While modern antibiotics can effectively treat plague, thousands of cases are still reported each year to the World Health Organization, and the bacterium has been identified as a possible biological warfare agent.

CONTINUED: Plague Could Worsen With Climate Change
 
Your alarmism doesn't help the situation, Noodle!
 
Humanity may indeed have doomed itself already. And to be perfectly honest, if one were to put the interests of the planet > humanity, it wouldn't be a bad thing if we had.

But that's only if one decides planet > humanity.

The question, I suppose, comes down to this.

What's more important? The life and stability of Nature as we know it, or the continuance of Humanity (and it's habit of over-usage in the name of ease)?
 
Humanity may indeed have doomed itself already. And to be perfectly honest, if one were to put the interests of the planet > humanity, it wouldn't be a bad thing if we had.

But that's only if one decides planet > humanity.

The question, I suppose, comes down to this.

What's more important? The life and stability of Nature as we know it, or the continuance of Humanity (and it's habit of over-usage in the name of ease)?

Seeing as how we depend on the stability of nature, I'd say the two are closely linked.
 
After a fashion, but all proof so far leads one to believe that Humanity isn't going to change it's consumerist, ecologically destructive ways.

Since this is damaging to nature and the balance/continuance of Life As We Know it upon this planet, one must come to a decision. Is humanity, with it's unchanging, destructive ways more important than the stability of nature and the diversity and balance of Life as We Know It, or is Nature and the rest of the Planet more important, thus making the eventual extinction of mankind due to our own damaging folly a good thing in the greater perspective?

One can hope that we'll change before we pass the event horizon (if we haven't already), but proof so far is that we won't.

I'm not saying I want everyone to die, but the question posed is a moral one. Is it better for Humanity to die, and the Planet to continue to live.. or is it better for Humanity to continue, and us to drain this world of all resources a la the Independence Day movie aliens?

Because that's what we're doing.

Honestly, I'm not sure. It's hard to weigh 6.77 billion Sentient lives against the rest of Nature itself.
 
After a fashion, but all proof so far leads one to believe that Humanity isn't going to change it's consumerist, ecologically destructive ways.

I present myself as a counter. More people change everyday.
 
I don't really lament the loss of humanity. We're only aware of losing it until it's gone. At that point it really doesn't matter anymore.
 
Who cares about death when the world is filled with libs and dems? Who would really want to live that long?
 
And to be perfectly honest, if one were to put the interests of the planet > humanity, it wouldn't be a bad thing if we had.

Planet > humanity? That's absolutely monstrous.
 
Last edited:
In about a billion years, the Earth will probably be completely lifeless and there's nothing we can do to stop it.

Alarmism
 
Back
Top Bottom