- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 9,919
- Reaction score
- 12,221
There aren’t a thousand trans athletes. There never will be.If it was a thousand trans athletes would it be wrong?
Is discrimination ok if it only affects a small number?
They said that about gay marriage at one time
It is a moral panic.
The legislation that was vetoed by Gov Cox was the banning of trans kids from high school sports.It's political malpractice for Democrats to side with male-to-female transgendered women in women's sports. You can say that there are not that many male-to-female transgender athletes, but there are not many top tier athletes period. By definition, a top tier athlete is a 1 in a million athlete.
Over 1500 men have ran a 4 minute mile. Not one woman in history has. The world record vo2 max for a man is 96, for a woman it is 77. The world record squat for a man is 1080 pounds, for a woman it is 570 pounds.
Looking into the issue, and realizing that the suicide rate of trans kids is high, banning them from participation in an activity that gives them community and purpose was a harsh measure given that there were a total of four out of 70,000 kids that are trans athletes in his state and only one of them is trans female.
Now if the opposition to trans athletes were to be offering a solution to the outrage other than outright banning and shitting on trans kids for votes… then sure let’s talk.
But all I see is the age old trope of protecting the women from predatory men story that plays very well in certain circles.