• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla is forcefully removed from Noem’s news conference and handcuffed

The head of ICE said the same thing... Trump was voted in on Dealing with Illegal Immigration and that is what he is doing. They aren't going anywhere and if anything, it will get worse for Illegal Immigrants. Los Angeles and California are run by idiots. I lived there and it has only gotten worse.
Trump was not voted in by the people of California to police their streets. Only fascists vote for the federal government to police the locals.

We have this thing called federalism. Nobody but fascists vote to dissolve the Constitution.
 
No argument.

And when Padilla did identify him, Noem should’ve directed those LEO’s to release Padilla instead of pretending like she didn’t see/hear him.

Padilla made an ass of himself, and Noem failed to do what she should’ve done.

She was giving a speech, not in charge of crowd management. I honestly have no idea how anybody could blame a speaker for LEO's removing a disruptive person. What should she have done, in the middle of her speech, to help stop Padilla from being a disruptive ass, your term.???


.
 
Trump was not voted in by the people of California to police their streets. Only fascists vote for the federal government to police the locals.

We have this thing called federalism. Nobody but fascists vote to dissolve the Constitution.

Your post is all sorts of off topic Straw Man bullshit.


Trump was voted in to deal with Illegal Immigration nation wide... there is nothing about him being able to do so in Texas but not California.

Nobody is dissolving the Constitution. Just relax. LOL
,
 
Maybe she did. Privately. During the meeting facilitated by the Secret Service/FBI who wrestled him out of the room. Wouldn't we like to know what they said to each other.
Padilla gave an interview that night. He didn't mention an apology.

But I'm glad you asked the question because in replying to your post at #882 I did not respond to:

She was describing a coup against California and Los Angeles. And this is being said within the context of Trump violating the law by invoking 12406 when a rebellion does not exist.

I didn't respond because the only part of the comment I disagree with is your use of the word "coup." Civil authority still governs the state and the city. The courts are still up and functioning.
What she described was the federal government "rescuing" the city from its duly elected officials. With the military. Sounds like a coup to me.

The military is protecting federal property and ICE agents as they perform their statutory duties.
ICE agents are armed. They don't need any more protection, and if they do, bring more ICE agents. Or FBI. It's illegal to use the military.

Any person they might detain is turned over to local or federal law enforcement and not held for a military tribunal.

The federalization of the National Guard and the deployment of active duty forces is a statutory and constitutional dispute now on appeal. (To be heard this Tuesday.)
It's obvious to a casual observer that Trump hasn't met any of the conditions required by law.

Are the state and city governments able to enforce the law and maintain order?
This is what's dangerous. The law doesn't empower POTUS to make this decision. It's up to the states. The statute specifically deals with federal law. If the governor refuses to act on federal law - if Newsom activated the guard to surround the federal building, preventing ICE from entering, for example - then I believe the stature would apply. This LA protest and small riot don't satisfy the condition.

If POTUS held the power to deem any violence an insurrection necessitating troops on the street, then there is no check against troops on every street in the country.

Did the governor request federal assistance as required by statute?
He didn't.

The appeals process and decision may well be the most significant result arising from this mess.
Trump's argument hasn't been in showing how the conditions in LA satisfy the text of the law. The argument is that POTUS, and POTUS alone has the power to declare and define an emergency. Once Trump declares an emergency, it's out of the court's hands. I don't think the courts are eager to relinquish their constitutionally equal power.
 
Last edited:
Your post is all sorts of off topic Straw Man bullshit.
Cool.

Trump was voted in to deal with Illegal Immigration nation wide... there is nothing about him being able to do so in Texas but not California.
Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass were voted in by Californians. I'm guessing they don't care about your opinion on strawman arguments. They likely do care that you oppose federalism.


Nobody is dissolving the Constitution. Just relax. LOL
,
Your denial is all over the thread. Some things are sacrosanct to Americans. Things you apparently know nothing about.

States are run by governors. When the feds barge in against the state's will, that's a constitutional violation. It's fascism.

All your wiggling doesn't change this.
 
Cool.


Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass were voted in by Californians. I'm guessing they don't care about your opinion on strawman arguments. They likely do care that you oppose federalism.



Your denial is all over the thread. Some things are sacrosanct to Americans. Things you apparently know nothing about.

States are run by governors. When the feds barge in against the state's will, that's a constitutional violation. It's fascism.

All your wiggling doesn't change this.

Independent? LOL.

Flaming Leftist Liberal, more like it.

You know frighteningly little about government.

m
 
Independent?
Yes, like the states.

When you can't admit defeat, turn to the stupid adhoms. Trump must be proud.

New Zealander? LOL.

Flaming Leftist Liberal, more like it.
Friggin' Kiwi eater.

You know frighteningly little about government.
Your argument lacks substance. You know absolutely nothing about substance.

You either support fascism or you don't. Trying to wiggle into some nonexistent middle ground is cute. Presidents aren't kings. That Trump sits in the WH doesn't give him dictatorial powers. You've been clear in your support for this.
 
Yes, like the states.

United means the opposite or Independent. LOL

🌻 :) 🌻

When you can't admit defeat, turn to the stupid adhoms. Trump must be proud.

which you started...

New Zealander? LOL.

Such Nationalism...

Friggin' Kiwi eater.

Such hate....

Your argument lacks substance. You know absolutely nothing about substance.

You either support fascism or you don't.

You either support anarchy or you don't.

Trying to wiggle into some nonexistent middle ground is cute. Presidents aren't kings. That Trump sits in the WH doesn't give him dictatorial powers. You've been clear in your support for this.

You have changed. You used to be Independent. Something changed though... you are now a diehard Leftist.

All good... just adjust.


k
 
United means the opposite or Independent. LOL

🌻 :) 🌻



which you started...



Such Nationalism...



Such hate....



You either support anarchy or you don't.



You have changed. You used to be Independent. Something changed though... you are now a diehard Leftist.

All good... just adjust.


k
Friggin' Kiwi eaters. I'm tellin' ya.

Your inability to be honest in your support of fascism is boring.
 
Friggin' Kiwi eaters. I'm tellin' ya.

Your inability to be honest in your support of fascism is boring.

You used to post reasonably ... I liked lots or your posts.

Then it changed., dramatically...


n
 
You used to post reasonably ...
All my post to you have been reasonable. It's you who are excusing fascism. That's not my fault.

When POTUS says he's keeping the military in LA to free the country from its mayor and governor, every reasonable person on the planet sees fascism.

I liked lots or your posts.
Oh goodie. You also use dumb adhoms when you have nothing reasonable to write.

Then it changed., dramatically...
Put it in your diary. Did I not say you were boring me?
 
All my post to you have been reasonable. It's you who are excusing fascism. That's not my fault.


Oh goodie. You also use dumb adhoms when you have nothing reasonable to write.


Put it in your diary. Did I not say you were boring me?

Embrace who you are... *shrug*


,
 
Developing...
Unnamed sources are saying Kristi Noem may have received a bit of an ass-chewing over her tussle with Padilla.
Seems the optics aren't panning out in Trump's favor or hers.
Wait till Americans wake up to veterans being arrested before the parade even commences.
 
Developing...
Unnamed sources are saying Kristi Noem may have received a bit of an ass-chewing over her tussle with Padilla.
Seems the optics aren't panning out in Trump's favor or hers.
Wait till Americans wake up to veterans being arrested before the parade even commences.
An ass chewing from Trump? The guy that said take 'em outside, beat 'em up, and I'll pay your legal bills?

Noem is following a script. She's qualified to only read scripts. Unexpected circumstances confuse her. She stood there, continuing to talk, like everything was normal. Probably peeing her panties. Not in fear for her safety - she knows who Padilla is - but because she didn't know what to do.
 
She was giving a speech, not in charge of crowd management. I honestly have no idea how anybody could blame a speaker for LEO's removing a disruptive person. What should she have done, in the middle of her speech, to help stop Padilla from being a disruptive ass, your term.???


.

She could have told she would answer his question when she was finished speaking and invite him to take a seat. They are acquainted with one another after all.

Is common decency really that dead?
 
And you guys have been lying about how it really happened.

Why would you treat someone you know so brutally?

Republican Senator Murkowski is outraged over his treatment. Why would she lie about what happened?
 
She could have told she would answer his question when she was finished speaking and invite him to take a seat. They are acquainted with one another after all.

Is common decency really that dead?
Evidently Padillo didn't consider common decency when he disrupted the press conference. He certainly garnered the attention he sought without ever asking his "question."
 
Evidently Padillo didn't consider common decency when he disrupted the press conference. He certainly garnered the attention he sought without ever asking his "question."

All they had to do was ask him to please wait his turn, not throw him on the ground and cuff him for God's sake.

Why does every MAGA response to a problem have to involve brutality and punishment?
 
Your post is all sorts of off topic Straw Man bullshit.


Trump was voted in to deal with Illegal Immigration nation wide... there is nothing about him being able to do so in Texas but not California.

Nobody is dissolving the Constitution. Just relax. LOL
,

Noem was telling her audience that they were in LA to overthrow the government. Not sure that's constitutional, but ok.
 
Back
Top Bottom