- Joined
- Oct 30, 2021
- Messages
- 32,905
- Reaction score
- 34,449
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Wtf... are you OK?
This is considered normal posting lol, standards being relative of course.
Wtf... are you OK?
This is considered normal posting lol, standards being relative of course.
Not from this poster, in my experience. Shit is getting worse, and way too fast.
Why do you believe this is true? Be specific.ICE appears to have failed to pick up the person on a timely basis.
Because Norfolk County said as much. Notice I said "appears". According to Norfolk County they 1) notified ICE of the release date and 2) said ICE reported they would not be able to make the pickup. So by all accounts, ICE apparently is at fault here.Why do you believe this is true? Be specific.
Why, are they looking for free room and board?I have just one question.
All the folks on here that want all the illegals to stay,how many of them have you volunteered to sponsor and put up in your home?
Cite, please.Because Norfolk County said as much. Notice I said "appears". According to Norfolk County they 1) notified ICE of the release date and 2) said ICE reported they would not be able to make the pickup. So by all accounts, ICE apparently is at fault here.
Do you have evidence that suggests otherwise?
Do you lecture people on the left who accuse the people who want the immigration laws enforced as being racists, too?Bud... this ain't you.
Or, more to the point, a victory for AMERICA and AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Did you miss my prior response directly to you? #31.Cite, please.
Do you lecture people on the left who accuse the people who want the immigration laws enforced as being racists, too?
Yes, I did; got it now. A state can hold someone under an immigration detention order for 48 hours, and then they must be released if there's no other reason to hold them.Did you miss my prior response directly to you? #31.
They notified ICE of his release date. According to their records, ICE claimed they could not arrange a pickup. Until he is released, he is under local jurisdiction. Jails and prisons do not release inmates until their sentence is served, regardless of immigration status.Yes, I did; got it now. A state can hold someone under an immigration detention order for 48 hours, and then they must be released if there's no other reason to hold them.
But you're still missing the point. Norfolk officials -- and all the other state officials who processed this thug's 17 felony charges -- could have, at any time during the what had to be at least a months' long prosecution, contacted ICE and said "Hey, we have one for you." There would then have been ample time for ICE and those officials to arrange a pick up time. But MA officials never did that because discretionary cooperation is against sanctuary policy.
That this man was loose in the community is entirely the fault of MA's sanctuary policies. There is no getting around that reality.
That statement does not refute my point. That man had to be under active prosecution for months (or longer) with no notification to ICE. There would have been ample time to deport this thug but for MA officials' unwillingness to cooperate with immigration law enforcement.They notified ICE of his release date. According to their records, ICE claimed they could not arrange a pickup. Until he is released, he is under local jurisdiction. Jails and prisons do not release inmates until their sentence is served, regardless of immigration status.
That statement does not refute my point. That man had to be under active prosecution for months (or longer) with no notification to ICE.
Could one say that the MA officials were obstructing ICE?There would have been ample time to deport this thug but for MA officials' unwillingness to cooperate with immigration law enforcement.
Could one say that the MA officials were obstructing ICE?
Facts you don't like aren't 'disinformation'.
Yes, it does.
There is no responsibility to report anyone under prosecution to ICE. All criminal perps are charged and serve sentences according to their crimes, regardless of their immigration status.That statement does not refute my point. That man had to be under active prosecution for months (or longer) with no notification to ICE. There would have been ample time to deport this thug but for MA officials' unwillingness to cooperate with immigration law enforcement.
Excellent. We can leave this fascinating little exchange there.No, it doesn't.
That is where we fundamentally differ. I assert MA officials have a moral responsibility to protect the citizens of this state, and when they willfully ignore an opportunity to take a thug like this one off the streets in MA (and from everywhere else in the US, for that matter), they are failing to live up to that responsibility.There is no responsibility to report anyone under prosecution to ICE
I have looked at the evidence posted in this thread. If you'd like to add to it, please do.
For the sake of discussion, let us stipulate that deportations were at a 10-year high in 2024. So what? That does not alter the fact that thugs like the one I've cited -- and the 100s of others detained this month -- were walking the streets of Boston because of this state's sanctuary policies.These aren't necessarily the best ones for you but they give basics.
Deportations by ICE jumped to 10-year high in 2024, surpassing Trump-era peak - CBS News https://search.app/zhScFnFxiW8kuX4D6
ICE budget shortage could delay Trump’s mass deportation plans https://search.app/eYcFyTVwfKjKQb176
More he came in 2020:
Massachusetts illegal immigrants arrested by ICE for rape https://search.app/6knYwe9G8jxWKbddA
Fair enough I guess.Legally, no. They don't have an obligation to cooperate. Morally, yes, absolutely.