• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DEA and other law enforcement round up 50 illegal aliens in Denver

NatMorton said:
This is part of a good start for Trump's deportation program. Let's hope they can keep it on the rails.

Boston ICE had similar success, and it's really exposing the dark side of blue state sanctuary policies. One deportee from Boston had -- I kid you not -- 17 convictions on various assault, battery, weapon, and drug charges. Think about that for a second, this man was:
  1. In the country illegally
  2. Tried and convicted on 17 felony charges, many of them violent crimes.
  3. Inexplicably, walking the streets of Boston.

This is how warped the left's thinking on immigration policy has become. After, say, the first conviction of a violent crime, no one -- not the cops, not the DA, not the judge -- decided to act on the thought "Maybe we should call ICE on this one?"

Dereliction of duty doesn't even begin to describe the MA justice system in this matter, and it sounds like MA does not stand alone in this regard.
Click to expand...
Is this what the left means by 'Social Justice'? That illegal immigrants and minorities get to commit whatever crime they fell like committing?
 
NatMorton said:
You're really not getting this. First off, why is a man with 17 fresh felony convictions being released in the first place? Second, the request came in from ICE while he was detained. Local officials ignored it and decided releasing him back into the community was the the right thing to do.

They, like you, are far too indifferent to public safety.
Click to expand...
:LOL:

Begs the question, why is a man with 34 fresh felony convictions is not in Prison but instead is sitting behind the Resolute Desk?
 
NatMorton said:
Google is your friend.

www.ice.gov

ICE ERO Boston arrests Haitian gang member with numerous convictions

ICE officers from ERO Boston arrested Wisteguens Jean Quely Charles, a member of a violent Haitian street gang, in Boston Jan. 22. Charles’ convictions include multiple drug, weapons, and assault and battery crimes.
www.ice.gov www.ice.gov
Click to expand...
Just think.
If Harris would have been elected this guy would still be committing crimes in Boston, and more of the same would be flooding the Southern Border, and permitted entry into the nation.
The nation is fortunate that the election results were what they were.
 
NatMorton said:
You're really not getting this. First off, why is a man with 17 fresh felony convictions being released in the first place?
Click to expand...

You'll have to ask the courts that question. What were those charges and what were the imposed sentences.
NatMorton said:
Second, the request came in from ICE while he was detained. Local officials ignored it and decided releasing him back into the community was the the right thing to do.
Click to expand...

That is according to ICE. Norfolk County Sheriff's office said they notified ICE of his release date and their records show ICE said they could not pick him up. So it's now a "he said, he said" between ICE and Norfolk County.
NatMorton said:
They, like you, are far too indifferent to public safety.
Click to expand...
If ICE fails to do their job and pick him up, what are the various jails to do, hold them indefinitely after their release date? Even ICE states the detain period is only up to 48 hours.
 
ICE and other immigration law enforcement services have serious staffing shortages. Have for years. Cuz they are underfunded by Congress. All of Congress knew this and agreed and so came to agreement on a funding bill last year.

Then someone said to wait, so "I" can use it to my political advantage. And Trump is working now to make these dramatic news events in Blue states so we all tend to not notice the actual aspects.

So yes, this evil thug was released from prison per his sentence. iCE had other things on their to-do list - maybe the removal last year of some MS-13 people. So ICE didn't have a team in place (for a period of months) for this pick-up.
 
eohrnberger said:
Just think.
If Harris would have been elected this guy would still be committing crimes in Boston, and more of the same would be flooding the Southern Border, and permitted entry into the nation.
The nation is fortunate that the election results were what they were.
Click to expand...

This speculation is based on misinformation & disinformation & political decision making since January 20th.

It shows lack of understanding of ICE operations last year. Cuz the Dem machine has been lousy at feeding info to the public.
 
NatMorton said:
They care far more about their political opinions than they do public safety, that's for sure.
Click to expand...
The left cares more for their vacuous virtue signalling to each other than either public opinion or public safety.
Tell you exactly how shallow and vacuous they are, that they need this vacuous virtue signalling to each other to boost their self-esteem.
 
NatMorton said:
... is bullshit. The number of sanctuary state thugs being deported over the last few weeks is evidence of that.
Click to expand...

Have you looked at & considered the number of deportations carried out last year?

Have you learned about at the serious staffing shortages within the immigration enforcement system?
 
JerryW said:
This speculation is based on misinformation & disinformation & political decision making since January 20th.

It shows lack of understanding of ICE operations last year. Cuz the Dem machine has been lousy at feeding info to the public.
Click to expand...
LOL. Right. Sure. Someone with 17 convictions in a few years isn't showing any signs of stopping.
That's why this illegal alien with 17 convictions is walking around Boston instead of back where he came from.

How'd he get here? Insufficient border enforcement and lax migrant vetting.
Who put those in place? Biden / Harris and their radicals in their administration, from Myorkas on down.
 
LouC said:
:LOL:

Begs the question, why is a man with 34 fresh felony convictions is not in Prison but instead is sitting behind the Resolute Desk?
Click to expand...
And the answer is, in no small part, due to the left's sanctuary policies.
 
trouble13 said:
White colege educated Progressive women across the country are panicking over the prospect of having to scrub their own toilets.

Meanwhile their husbands are fretting over the shortage of young children to have sex with that's coming.

Dark days ahead for the left
Click to expand...

Wtf... are you OK?
 
eohrnberger said:
LOL. Right. Sure. Someone with 17 convictions in a few years isn't showing any signs of stopping.
That's why this illegal alien with 17 convictions is walking around Boston instead of back where he came from.

How'd he get here? Insufficient border enforcement and lax migrant vetting.
Who put those in place? Biden / Harris and their radicals in their administration, from Myorkas on down.
Click to expand...

You are still including disinformation in your analysis.
 
Airyaman said:
You'll have to ask the courts that question. What were those charges and what were the imposed sentences.
Click to expand...
I already know the answer. Many MA officials have a standing order not to cooperate with US immigration. That is the essence of sanctuary policy.

Airyaman said:
That is according to ICE. Norfolk County Sheriff's office said they notified ICE of his release date and their records show ICE said they could not pick him up. So it's now a "he said, he said" between ICE and Norfolk County.
Click to expand...
Correct, so we must judge whom to believe. And seeing as how non-cooperation is the stated policy in sanctuary communities, what reason do we have to believe this was anything other than Norfolk county acting on that policy?

Airyaman said:
If ICE fails to do their job and pick him up, what are the various jails to do, hold them indefinitely after their release date? Even ICE states the detain period is only up to 48 hours.
Click to expand...
No, you have that wrong. It's Norfolk county that has failed, failed in its obligation to protect its citizens.


Why keep BS=ing on this? Deporting these thugs is good policy, and Trump is right for enacting it.
 
JerryW said:
Have you looked at & considered the number of deportations carried out last year?

Have you learned about at the serious staffing shortages within the immigration enforcement system?
Click to expand...
I have looked at the evidence posted in this thread. If you'd like to add to it, please do.
 
NatMorton said:
I already know the answer. Many MA officials have a standing order not to cooperate with US immigration. That is the essence of sanctuary policy.


Correct, so we must judge whom to believe. And seeing as how non-cooperation is the stated policy in sanctuary communities, what reason do we have to believe this was anything other than Norfolk county acting on that policy?


No, you have that wrong. It's Norfolk county that has failed, failed in its obligation to protect its citizens.


Why keep BS=ing on this? Deporting these thugs is good policy, and Trump is right for enacting it.
Click to expand...
BSing?

ICE appears to have failed to pick up the person on a timely basis. It is not up to local authorities to indefinitely retain people until ICE gets around to doing their job.

Let's pretend the perp was a US citizen and had been released from jail just as this person was. Does the immigration status change the "danger" a person is to society after release from a sentencing period?
 
Integrityrespec said:
I have just one question.
All the folks on here that want all the illegals to stay,how many of them have you volunteered to sponsor and put up in your home?
Click to expand...

I don't even see how the question is relevant. I don't sponsor legal immigrants, let alone illegal immigrants, and I'm going to assume that unless you own your own enterprise that depends on immigrants, you don't either. Your question ain't the flex you think it is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom