Chagos
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2015
- Messages
- 35,211
- Reaction score
- 11,647
- Location
- in expatria
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
But nor as sloppily formulated as your claim.That’s hair splitting.
So, FWIW, correct.
But nor as sloppily formulated as your claim.That’s hair splitting.
No, that's all in your head. You're so biased that you can't even see how your position would render high profile trials impossible.No it’s not. The media and some elected officials gave the defense grounds for an appeal. So did the trial Judge.
If I have this bias, why don’t you look up my comments on the Chauvin case and show me this biasNo, that's all in your head. You're so biased that you can't even see how your position would render high profile trials impossible.
What claim are you talking about? You might be confusing me for someone else.But nor as sloppily formulated as your claim.
So, FWIW, correct.
For anyone else, that would be an incredibly vile accusation to make against another poster. For you its just post 77,931.
You didn’t correct me as I did not make the comment.Don't whine about people correcting you when you're wrong. It's a bad look.
Just admit you didn't know the difference. It's ok.
Ok. Don't whine about people correcting other posters that you've decided to white-knight for. It's a bad look.You didn’t correct me as I did not make the comment.
I guess all I can do is laugh or roll my eyes.
No, he was found guilty already in courtRight! We're in the social justice era now, baby! The accused must prove their innocence or be forever deemed guilty, guilty guilty!
I have ZERO sympathy for anyone killed by the cops. An easily avoidable event. Play with fire you get burned occasionallyOf course you have evidence of this, counselor. Other than your feelings, I mean, and your sad that a white cop didn't get away with killing a black man on camera.
I have ZERO sympathy for anyone killed by the cops. An easily avoidable event. Play with fire you get burned occasionally
Maybe you missed the point of this thread. Chauvin, through his lawyer, is asking for a new trial.No, he was found guilty already in court
Does not change what I said.Maybe you missed the point of this thread. Chauvin, through his lawyer, is asking for a new trial.
Maybe you missed the point of this thread. Chauvin, through his lawyer, is asking for a new trial.
I would expect them to exhaust every legal method to try to get him off. As long as he has the money to pay they will keep filing.......His lawyer filed a ROUTINE motion and we are all supposed to be worried?
I would expect them to exhaust every legal method to try to get him off. As long as he has the money to pay they will keep filing.......
How is laughing at the goofy ones unpleasant?I'm sorry to hear that. How unpleasant for you.
Who’s worried? It may be a routine motion, but it looks like there’s some credible basis for this and it will be taken seriously.His lawyer filed a ROUTINE motion and we are all supposed to be worried?
Who’s worried? It may be a routine motion, but it looks like there’s some credible basis for this and it will be taken seriously.
It’s obvious that public reaction is being considered n this case. The threats of violence have been made quite clear. That’s bound to have an impact with anyone connected to this case.
No, thats not what I am saying. When you watch the tape you get to see Chauvins actions and you get to watch the guy under Chavins knee expire. What Chauvin needs to do is prove that his actions were justified and the proper way for an officer of the law to deal with a subdued subject. So yes, there was a burden upon him. He failed to live up to that burden and that is why he was convicted.Right! We're in the social justice era now, baby! The accused must prove their innocence or be forever deemed guilty, guilty guilty!
I am a Trump supporter and I dont support Chauvin. So much for your stupid theory.For some reason I believe those who support Chauvin are also Trump supporters.
Wonder why?
That an appeal has been filed, respectively (in your case) that to correct that statement was hair splitting..What claim are you talking about? You might be confusing me for someone else.
That an appeal has been filed.
Do try to keep up with your own posts by all means.
You are a unicorn.I am a Trump supporter and I dont support Chauvin. So much for your stupid theory.