- Joined
- Dec 26, 2019
- Messages
- 3,872
- Reaction score
- 1,039
- Location
- Sunny red state Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
This information may be available but I haven't seen it and we all need to know the answer. In reference to mail in vote counting and signature verification, do the people with this responsibility know the party affiliation (Dem or Rep) or whom that person did in fact vote for when making a decision. If any of this information is available to them can we be confident in their decission to allow the signature or throw the ballot out?
Most of this mail in conformation will take place after Nov 3 and I assume that a partial vote count will show who is in the lead. If we have to deal with the real possibility that signature verifications will be skewed by political bias then it is the number #1 reason to abolish this already flawed concept.
Hell no we can't. That's the whole point. The democrats want to create a contested election. If Trump wins, they'll litigate that **** all the way to 2024.
Did you trust the mail in votes cast in 2016?
This information may be available but I haven't seen it and we all need to know the answer. In reference to mail in vote counting and signature verification, do the people with this responsibility know the party affiliation (Dem or Rep) or whom that person did in fact vote for when making a decision. If any of this information is available to them can we be confident in their decission to allow the signature or throw the ballot out?
Most of this mail in conformation will take place after Nov 3 and I assume that a partial vote count will show who is in the lead. If we have to deal with the real possibility that signature verifications will be skewed by political bias then it is the number #1 reason to abolish this already flawed concept.
This information may be available but I haven't seen it and we all need to know the answer. In reference to mail in vote counting and signature verification, do the people with this responsibility know the party affiliation (Dem or Rep) or whom that person did in fact vote for when making a decision. If any of this information is available to them can we be confident in their decission to allow the signature or throw the ballot out?
Most of this mail in conformation will take place after Nov 3 and I assume that a partial vote count will show who is in the lead. If we have to deal with the real possibility that signature verifications will be skewed by political bias then it is the number #1 reason to abolish this already flawed concept.
Of course we did and all previous elections but under Trump leadership in the last 4 years every government operation as taken a nose dive.
Trump has destroyed this country.
It depends.
I trust my state's (Colorado) mail-in voting system. It's been in use for seven years. We have laws, procedures and processes in place that make it very safe, secure and convenient. And people who still want to vote in person can also do that.
I don't know what other states have done to make their laws, procedures and processes to make their state's systems safe and secure. But I suspect some states haven't done a very good job.
One thing I totally oppose is counting mail-in ballots AFTER election day. Colorado rejects any mail-in ballots that arrive after 7:30pm on election day. That is the same time the in-person polls close. If voters cannot ensure they get to the polls before they close or ensure their ballot arrives before the polls close then their votes being rejected is entirely their own fault.
The last thing I want is states taking weeks or more to count their ballots and certifying their election numbers. This sort of thing makes it too easy for a bunch of votes being "found" after election day.
This information may be available but I haven't seen it and we all need to know the answer. In reference to mail in vote counting and signature verification, do the people with this responsibility know the party affiliation (Dem or Rep) or whom that person did in fact vote for when making a decision. If any of this information is available to them can we be confident in their decission to allow the signature or throw the ballot out?
Most of this mail in conformation will take place after Nov 3 and I assume that a partial vote count will show who is in the lead. If we have to deal with the real possibility that signature verifications will be skewed by political bias then it is the number #1 reason to abolish this already flawed concept.
Can we really trust the mail in vote process as it stands?.
Can you name ONE state that has not had mail in votes in the last 30 years?
Did you trust the mail in votes cast in 2016?
This information may be available but I haven't seen it and we all need to know the answer. In reference to mail in vote counting and signature verification, do the people with this responsibility know the party affiliation (Dem or Rep) or whom that person did in fact vote for when making a decision. If any of this information is available to them can we be confident in their decission to allow the signature or throw the ballot out?
Most of this mail in conformation will take place after Nov 3 and I assume that a partial vote count will show who is in the lead. If we have to deal with the real possibility that signature verifications will be skewed by political bias then it is the number #1 reason to abolish this already flawed concept.
of course not
I find myself in a predicament, I asked for a mail in ballot but as I know now it won't be counted I'd like to vote in person but I can't because once you ask for a mail in, they take you off the voting registry.
sigh...
You can nitpick all you want, but this is the first year that anyone is calling for ALL mail-in voting, such as what Colorado has.
For sure, all states have had absentee ballots. That is not the same thing as all mail-in voting.
What is the difference between ballots mailed in and absentee ballots?
I can trust my state's mail-in system, but that's because Colorado isn't some retarded, ass-backwards state that can't figure out how to make a working mail-in system.
Plus, Colorado has had more than seven years to get it right. Other states have had months...if they've bothered to make it right at all.
If they are counting on their absentee ballot system to handle the volume, it'll take them weeks to get a count...weeks in which people can run their fraud tactics.
Laws, process, procedures...and volume.
IMHO, all fair-minded people agree that we are NOT set up for a nation-wide voting system.
Besides the usual fraud, the main problem will be unforeseen glitches in the system on such a massive scale and in such a short time.
Ballots, for example, will still be arriving after November 3, and some states have expressly passed laws allowing them to be counted.
If you think the Al Gore - George W. Bush election was a mess, you ain't seen nothing yet.
This election will probably end up in the Supreme Court. And, of course, some folks are NOT going to be happy with the final ruling.
*****
President Trump was right when he suggested postponing the election (as has been done in a few countries, I hear), but -- of course -- the Dems dismissed such a possibility out of hand.
*****
I know one thing: Stores on November 3 had better be boarded up. I have no doubt the mobs will take advantage of the election chaos.
Our poor country!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?