• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Calls for gun control stir little support [W:265]

Thunder said:
so they said they were out of state, and they bought guns in Ohio.

what's is the problem with that?
Click to expand...

Uh you cannot buy handguns in Ohio if you don't live in ohio unless you hold a federal firearms license
 
Thunder said:
its pretty damn close to it. have you seen the videos?

the bump-stock allows pretty much automatic fire.
Click to expand...

of course I have-I also have seen those silly devices you put in your trigger guard and turn a crank
 
Thunder said:
why the hell not? who made this law?
Click to expand...

are you trying to divert again? don't you think its funny that an asshole who whines that gun laws aren't tough enough proves that the ones we have are not being enforced?
 
TurtleDude said:
are you trying to divert again? don't you think its funny that an asshole who whines that gun laws aren't tough enough proves that the ones we have are not being enforced?
Click to expand...

do you support this law, that forbids people from New York or Connecticut or Maine, from being able to buy a handgun in Ohio?
 
Thunder said:
do you support this law, that forbids people from New York or Connecticut or Maine, from being able to buy a handgun in Ohio?
Click to expand...

I support jailing dishonest politicians who want to infringe on my freedoms by breaking existing laws in a pathetic attempt to try to prove we need more laws
 
TurtleDude said:
I support jailing dishonest politicians who want to infringe on my freedoms by breaking existing laws in a pathetic attempt to try to prove we need more laws
Click to expand...

do you, or do you not, support the law making it illegal to buy handguns across state lines???
 
Thunder said:
do you, or do you not, support the law making it illegal to buy handguns across state lines???
Click to expand...

I don't believe that the federal government properly has the power to regulate small arms
 
TurtleDude said:
I don't believe that the federal government properly has the power to regulate small arms
Click to expand...

and yet, you want Bloomberg and the NYPD personnel who bought guns across state-lines, to be imprisoned for this, along with Bloomberg becoming someone's sex-slave?

how do you explain such inconsistency on this issue?
 
Thunder said:
and yet, you want Bloomberg and the NYPD personnel who bought guns across state-lines, to be imprisoned for this, along with Bloomberg becoming someone's sex-slave?

how do you explain such inconsistency on this issue?
Click to expand...

uh people who want to infringe on the rights of others by increasing harassing laws ought to be hoisted on their own petards


for example, I don't have problems with things like gay marriage, cross dressing, etc. but if some holier than thou bible thumping fascist guy is caught wearing fishnet hose while giving a guy a hummer I think its fair to utterly thrash him for that

same when Kerry whines about the rich not paying enough taxes as he stashes the Good Ship Mr Teresa Heinz Yacht in a state other than his own to avoid the idiotic parasitic taxes
 
Thunder said:
why would you want to criminally assualt someone for committing a consentual sex act with another adult?

how would that be any of your business?
Click to expand...

you are back to engaging in mental masturbation and contrarian nonsense
 
Thunder said:
you said that it would ok to assault someone for committing a sexual act on another consenting adult, simply because its two guys.

that's advocating a hate-crime and criminal-assault.
Click to expand...

Your posts are getting silly and contrarian-thrash, bash etc can mean many things

back on topic or you can talk to yourself
 
TurtleDude said:
Your posts are getting silly and contrarian-thrash, bash etc can mean many things

back on topic or you can talk to yourself
Click to expand...


why would you want to imprison Blooomberg for violating a law that you yourself think is unjust and unConstitutional?

yes, they violated Federal law by buying handguns in Ohio.

But YOU don't think such a thing should be illegal. YOU think the law making this illegal, is a huge corruption & abuse of the Commerce Clause.

and yet, you want Bloomberg and NYPD personnel to be convicted & punished for violating this law????????

that makes no sense, TD.
 
Last edited:
Thunder said:
the AK-47 is a very common military weapon.

simply making it semi-auto, doesn't truly remove its extreme lethality, especially with the new bump-fire stock by Slidefire Solutions.
Click to expand...

I doubt if there are many people ignorant enough to believe that a gun using a “bump fire” device is controllable enough to be used for any purpose other than wasting bullets.
 
Bob Blaylock said:
What does “…shall not be infringed” mean, then?
Click to expand...

oh that means "reasonable controls" after a "reasonable dialogue" on what "reasonable citizens" want through their "elected representatives"
 
Bob Blaylock said:
I doubt if there are many people ignorant enough to believe that a gun using a “bump fire” device is controllable enough to be used for any purpose other than wasting bullets.
Click to expand...

Then you seriously underestimate the effectiveness of Bump Fire. In the hands of a marksman:

 
Lachean said:
Then you seriously underestimate the effectiveness of Bump Fire. In the hands of a marksman...
Click to expand...

Indeed, the slide-fire stock gives you virtual automatic fire.

you could kill a lot of people pretty quickly, using that stock.

um..I mean...shoot a lot of watermelons. ;)
 
Thunder said:
Indeed, the slide-fire stock gives you virtual automatic fire.

you could kill a lot of people pretty quickly, using that stock.

um..I mean...shoot a lot of watermelons. ;)
Click to expand...

You could do alot of things, guns have more purposes than mass murder.
 
Thunder said:
Indeed, the slide-fire stock gives you virtual automatic fire.

you could kill a lot of people pretty quickly, using that stock.

um..I mean...shoot a lot of watermelons. ;)
Click to expand...


wanna see real fast

I shot next to this guy at Nationals one year

 
NOw this is smoking

 
ttwtt78640 said:
A quick search turned up these links:

Barack Obama on Gun Control

Obama: Gun Control 'Should Be Common Sense' | ThinkProgress

Why Obama Would Be Foolish Not to Pursue Gun Control - Ronald Brownstein - The Atlantic
Click to expand...

He also said:
"I’m consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry."
Chicago Tribune, 4/27/04

"I think it’s a scandal that this president (Bush) did not authorize a renewal of the assault weapons ban."
Illinois Senate Debate #3: Barack Obama vs. Alan Keyes, 10/21/04
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom