- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 37,391
- Reaction score
- 15,942
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You could say much the same about Europe without the stone age part. A bunch of warring tribes, kingdoms, lordships, nations, etc who fought brutal wars over religion, territory, etc. almost as often as the tribal warlords did. The notion that Africa cannot come up with democracy on its own considering the history of the continent had varying governing bodies before the colonists arrived is well ignorant.Much of the continent, pre-colonial era, consisted of stone age tribes warring among themselves, often in a very brutal manner.
What would it be like if there had been no European empires? If Africa had been left strictly alone? I don't know. Would it still be warring stone age tribes? Perhaps, who can say. At least some of the continent now has modern medicine, technology, and a grasp of the notion of democracy. If Africa had been left alone, that might not have been the case.
I'm not saying "colonialism good" btw... I'm saying it resulted in some mixed outcomes, some good, some bad.
If the colonial powers had not carved out the continent between warring colonial empires, Africa would be a much different place.
Countries like Gana are just now experimenting with democracy now that the blood diamond trade has left.
Other countries like the Congo are bad now because their leaders are horrible, however in the context of King Leopold II’s unimaginably brutal “free state”, one can surmise where that was learned from.
When the colonists arrived however, they began the policy of divide and conquer which got Britain and many other empires slaves with the added bonus of pretending the imperialist powers had their hands clean.
The tutsi and the hutu clash i dont see european involvement having much to do with it but thankfully the Rwandan genocide has ended and they are trying out restorative justice.
Last edited: