• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brett Kavanaugh Just Declared War on Roe v. Wade (1 Viewer)

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
95,735
Reaction score
84,638
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Brett Kavanaugh Just Declared War on Roe v. Wade

90


2/7/19
On Thursday night, the Supreme Court blocked a stringent Louisiana abortion law by a 5–4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the liberals to keep the measure on hold. Roberts’ vote is surprising, but not a total shock: The Louisiana statute is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and until the court overturns that decision, the Louisiana law cannot take effect. To Roberts, this precedent matters. To Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it does not. Kavanaugh so disagreed with the majority that he wrote a dissent explaining why the Louisiana law should be allowed to move forward—an opinion that should not be taken as anything less than a declaration of war on Roe v. Wade.

continued @ the link

Despite his dishonest protestations at his confirmation hearing, Kavanaugh exactly where I thought the douche-bag would be regarding abortion.
 
They pushed him through for a reason.
 
Shocked, I'm shocked I tell you...

It's not like everyone and their uncle called it or anything.
 
This was only a vote whether or not to put a hold on the law or not people on both sides are going crazy about this maybe yall should wait until the case is actual heard

I think the point is regarding Kavvy's dissent. Interest in that document seems quite valid.
 
Doh! Crybaby does not consider requiring a doctor to have Admitting Privileges in a nearby hospital to perform a legal abortion an undue burden Five justices did not agree with his dissent.

The Supreme Court leans Conservative. CryBaby acted in predictable bias character. Thank God a majority disagreed with his dissent!
 
This was only a vote whether or not to put a hold on the law or not people on both sides are going crazy about this maybe yall should wait until the case is actual heard

Amen, instead of vilifying Kavanaugh which let's face it, is an attack on his faith.
 
Doh! Crybaby does not consider requiring a doctor to have Admitting Privileges in a nearby hospital to perform a legal abortion an undue burden Five justices did not agree with his dissent.

The Supreme Court leans Conservative. CryBaby acted in predictable bias character. Thank God a majority disagreed with his dissent!

You should probably have read what was going on with the case before you comment. No judgement about admitting privilege being an undue burden or not has been made yet. This was only the decision to suspend the law until such a judgement can be made
 
This was only a vote whether or not to put a hold on the law or not people on both sides are going crazy about this maybe yall should wait until the case is actual heard

In all fairness Bush was an establishment Republican. That makes him virtually indistinguishable from your average Democratic politician. It's little wonder Roberts is drifting left already. Give him a couple of years and he'll be a full blown justice Kennedy.
 
Another lw scare alert. They use fear to control the sheep.
 
You should probably have read what was going on with the case before you comment. No judgement about admitting privilege being an undue burden or not has been made yet. This was only the decision to suspend the law until such a judgement can be made

I generally place a low priority on advice borne from ignorance.
 
Show of hands. Anybody surprised at this? Anybody?

Bueller? Bueller?

this is the problem when using bogus ass sources like slate for your information 10/10 times they get it wrong.

here is his actual opinion on the matter.

Louisiana has three clinics that currently provide abortions. As relevant here, four doctors perform abortions at
those three clinics. One of those four doctors has admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, as required by
the new law. The question is whether the other three
doctors—Doe 2, Doe 5, and Doe 6—can obtain the necessary admitting privileges. If they can, then the three
clinics could continue providing abortions. And if so, then
the new law would not impose an undue burden for purposes of Whole Woman’s Health. By contrast, if the three
doctors cannot obtain admitting privileges, then one or
two of the three clinics would not be able to continue
providing abortions. If so, then even the State acknowledges that the new law might be deemed to impose an
undue burden for purposes of Whole Woman’s Health.
The law has not yet taken effect, so the case comes to us
in the context of a pre-enforcement facial challenge.

That means that the parties have offered, in essence, competing
predictions about whether those three doctors can obtain
admitting privileges. The District Court concluded that
the three doctors likely could not obtain admitting privileges. The District Court therefore enjoined the law. The
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that the
three doctors likely could obtain admitting privileges. The
Fifth Circuit therefore lifted the injunction.

See what happens when you use facts instead of nonsensical appeals to emotion.
things make way more sense.

He was right the stay should have been rejected until such time as the plaintiffs can produce
an actual undo burden exists.
 
I generally place a low priority on advice borne from ignorance.

If you rely on hack sites like slate then your ignorance will always remain high.
you should probably read the actual opinion and then you can actually be informed and
carry a conversation with facts.
 
Another lw scare alert. They use fear to control the sheep.

another post void of any argument, any intelligence. And by the way, you just described the republicans to a tee. only thing right wing idiots respond to are fear and hate. Did you see the message of doom and gloom at the RNC and Trump? The hysteria about a crisis at border and a migrant caravan 1000s of miles away?

Who thinks they need a border wall? Who think they can't leave the house without being armed? The chicken **** right wingers who are controlled by fear

If you rely on hack sites like slate then your ignorance will always remain high.
you should probably read the actual opinion and then you can actually be informed and
carry a conversation with facts.
more troll irony
 
This was only a vote whether or not to put a hold on the law or not people on both sides are going crazy about this maybe yall should wait until the case is actual heard

the people who scream the loudest on these issues, are often the ones with the least understanding of legal issues
 
far left hysterical rag sheet.

Kavanaugh's opinion though is spot on and agree's with the appeals court.
there is no war against roe vs wade.

the plantiffs have to offer that an undo burden exists. he even acknowledge that one would exist if the 3 doctors could
not get admitting privs to their hospitals and at that point in time could run foul of the law.

but they had 45 days to get that done before the law took affect.
again this was only a ruling on a stay not the actual law itself.

usually the courts should not rule on something unless someone can produce and actual harm.
since no harm was done and the law has not taken affect yet he was 100% right.
 
ano The chicken **** right wingers who are controlled by fear

ny
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...res-why/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e73c6b28dacd
It’s not wrong to compare Trump’s America to the Holocaust.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/04/national-socialism-neo-nazis-america-donald-trump

Is there a neo-Nazi storm brewing in Trump
https://prospect.org/article/trump-and-rise-21st-century-fascism
Trump and the Rise of 21st Century Fascism
ADELE M. STAN AUGUST 27, 2018
Wishing the danger would go away won’t make it so.
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-must-not-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report
We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN

“It’s the vision that Trump and Pence would like to accomplish,” said Agnew in reference to women’s rights potentially being stripped away.
https://www.phillyvoice.com/donning...handmaids-tale-brigade-protests-pence-philly/
FEAR FEAR FEAR---that's all the left knows!
 
Kavanaugh is exactly the pud we thought he was. Still employing his power over women.
 
Brett Kavanaugh Just Declared War on Roe v. Wade

90




Despite his dishonest protestations at his confirmation hearing, Kavanaugh exactly where I thought the douche-bag would be regarding abortion.
I see Slate, as usually, worked itself up to overwrought panic and hysteria. :roll: As I understand the issue here it was LA's requirement that a doctor performing an abortion have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital - HORROR of HORRORS. :eek:
 
His opinion is incredibly uninformed or dishonest in its hypocrisy.

The state of LA wants to demand surgical access to hospitals for abortion providers...yet no such requirements are made for mid-wives doing home births.

And abortion is 14 times safer than childbirth. (I have link on other laptop)

So unless they start changing the laws for home births and mid-wives...they are all lying hypocrites. And still suckering in the uninformed who will believe anything as long as it's what they want to hear.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom