• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Israel launches 'preemptive strike' against Iran, declares state of emergency

Allan said:
The last time there was regime change in Iran it didn't go well.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how much worse it could be. They already funded and equipped multiple multinational terrorist organizations with the explicitly stated goal of wiping Israel off the map. They did that because they couldn't do it conventionally. A nuke would have solved their problem and I would never have put it past the Iranian Islamic regime to use them on Israel if they had been successful. Not to even mention the egregious human rights violations they have inflicted on their own people for over 4 decades now. I hope the good people of Iran that we all praise when shitting on their government take the reins, or we will see history repeat.
 
jaypatriot said:
I believe that Bibi is handling the problem very well.
I believe he had no option but to cripple Iran's nuclear ambitions. If you can't see that, then that is just another one of your misgivings about the eternal conflict between Jews and Arabs/Persians.


I believe that Bibi is handling the problem very well.
I believe he had no option but to cripple Iran's nuclear ambitions. If you can't see that, then that is just another one of your misgivings about the eternal conflict between Jews and Arabs/Persians.
Click to expand...
Bibi is the problem. Like Trump he's dodging prison by Presidency. His overweening desire for greater Israel has killed thousands, Israeli's as well as Palestinians.
 
Revelation said:
not to worry, read the End of the book and we win and so does Israel.

this all started in 1948 and will end in Armageddon. the neo fascists lose in the end too; fasten yur seat belts and observe the End Times moving at a faster clip.
Click to expand...
Your desire for Armageddon is based on false information but endangers the planet.
 
Allan said:
The Revolutionary Guards take complete control.
Click to expand...
I fail to see how that would be worse. Also, at this moment I'm not sure how their recruitment and promotion efforts are going. At some point, someone with some brains has to say let's throw in the towel and stop all the death and destruction.

Remember, right now Israel is roaming free in the air and has many many boots on the ground to continue the disruption of the IRGC (which we can tell so far has been very successful.)

ETA:
As an internal security force, it has proven to be effective only at controlling an unarmed populace.
 
Manc Skipper said:
Your desire for Armageddon is based on false information but endangers the planet.
Click to expand...

The "desire for Armageddon" comes straight from Islamic orthodoxy.

Sahih Muslim, Book 54, Hadith 105: “The Last Hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them, until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: O Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.”
 
stevecanuck said:
The "desire for Armageddon" comes straight from Islamic orthodoxy.

Sahih Muslim, Book 54, Hadith 105: “The Last Hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them, until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: O Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.”
Click to expand...
Gee, so why hasn’t Iran launched its WMDs against Israel yet then?
 
ASHES said:
ETA:
As an internal security force, it has proven to be effective only at controlling an unarmed populace
Click to expand...
That's where the regime change idea could fall flat - citizens could never pull it off imo.

Unless the army stages a coup.
 
Head of IRGC intelligence, his deputy, and pretty much all top command of IRGC intelligence were reportedly eliminated in a strike on Tehran.
 
BirdinHand said:
I’m sorry, but nowhere in this planet are US troops “sitting ducks”

We have the best equipped military in the world. And they are highly trained and more than capable of defending themselves.

It is sad that you - and whatever source you post - thinks so little of them as to refer to them as “sitting ducks”
Click to expand...
Do tell what the US has to intercept Iranian ballistic missles if they are fired at US troops in the region because none of the missle intercept systems are capable of stopping ballistic missles.
BirdinHand said:
I do not want to see the United States involved in this conflict, but I would never stoop to the level of debasing our military by calling them “sitting ducks”

That’s just shameful.
Click to expand...
Stating that they have no protection from ballistic missiles isn't debasing the troops.
 
Horton has the facts and the reporter has nothing but untrue talking points.

 
multivita-man said:
Their nuke program is a threat, though. Imagine it's 2023 and Iran has 50-100 nuclear tipped missiles. Israel's options would be limited to going after Iran's proxies and very limited in terms of what they could do to Iran directly.
Click to expand...
They've been saying Iran is close to a nuclear weapon for over 25 years. Nobody believes that anymore. If they wanted nuclear weapons they would have them by now. Once Sadamm was gone their need for nuclear weapons was vastly diminished.

Isreal has nuclear weapons. Why can they say Iran can't have them when Israel has them?
 
NOLA Dude said:
They've been saying Iran is close to a nuclear weapon for over 25 years. Nobody believes that anymore. If they wanted nuclear weapons they would have them by now. Once Sadamm was gone their need for nuclear weapons was vastly diminished.

Isreal has nuclear weapons. Why can they say Iran can't have them when Israel has them?
Click to expand...
If we were neighbors with Iran they would also never get nukes.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Who gets decide who doesnt get nukes? Only the countries that already have nukes?
Click to expand...
The countries that would be threatened by them if they were acquired and have the means to prevent the acquisition.
 
Revelation said:
this is not a problem for the Ezekiel wars coming with Iran, Russia and Turkey, others joining in the fight and losing the fight.


Prophecy marches on people. time for an update on what you think can and cannot happen

it will happen bigly.

.
Click to expand...

None of those countries border Israel.

Just ignore all the false prophecies, right?
 
ColdHardTruth said:
I wouldn't believe ANYTHING dump says.

Israel is probably tired or Iran's terror proxies and has decided to make them pay for it.
Click to expand...
Netanyahu has said this will last weeks, not days.

When Trump says "massive conflict" I for once believe him.
 
NOLA Dude said:
They've been saying Iran is close to a nuclear weapon for over 25 years.
Click to expand...

That's because Israel keeps killing their nuclear scientists and sabotaging their program in other ways, but Iran's going deeper underground. I do agree with you that there were other ways to handle this, though.

If Republicans had not been so hellbent on owning the libs, they could have supported Obama's framework, which, by all known measures, slowed down their enrichment program to a virtual standstill. Not saying they solved the problem long-term, but they did achieve meaningful progress in slowing it down and creating a framework for future dialogue. In fact, it was successful enough that - guess what - MAGA Jesus basically tried to restart that framework but wiping Obama's name off and putting his name on it.

I'd concede that there's context that needs to be added. Trump saw a nuke deal with Iran (framework 2.0, let's call it) as part of a much larger national security tilt away from the Middle East and Russia and toward China, which he views as a serious adversary. Obama had China and Russia in mind, too, but he saw a much deeper commitment to the Middle East militarily than Trump has and does. Obama saw Russia as a pain in the ass but not a threat in the present, and I think he was wrong about that. He saw China as a potential threat long-term, but in the shorter term, more of a pain in the ass in terms of our influence in Asia - he was partly wrong about that, too, though 2015 was a different world than 2025 or even 2020. But he got some of the specifics right, and the 2015 deal was a good move, IMO.
 
Allan said:
That's where the regime change idea could fall flat - citizens could never pull it off imo.

Unless the army stages a coup.
Click to expand...
The Turks would maybe not stay out of it, either, if the Azeris got "let's not be Iranian anymore" notions. Never mind what happens over by the Indus, with the Balochs.
 
sanman said:
You call yourself Chomsky? Why?
Click to expand...
sanman said:
Your views obviously lean in the opposite direction.
Shouldn't you call yourself Mileikowsky? Or "Netanyahu"?
Bunch of Europeans whose ancestors never even set foot in what they call Israel, now calling themselves Israelites. What a masquerade.
And they're trampling all over the United States Constitution, especially Article 1, in connivance with the Cold War state.
Click to expand...

I admire his intellectual abilities and creative innovative thinking.

He's very good at discerning avenues of power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom