- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 45,404
- Reaction score
- 11,746
- Location
- Olympia Wa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Did you know that support for gay rights is not the same thing as wanting to see gay make out/sex scenes? I know it's shocking, but those two issues are not connected.
Like I said, if you find it entertaining to watch movies with dudes making out I encourage you to go to as many movies with guys making out in them as you can. As for me, I don't enjoy such things, so I will be skipping them.
It wasn't part of the original story because bigots just had to shove homophobia down everyone's throat!
Brokeback Mountain.
George Takei's biography.
Specifically, a story about someone who is gay, or about gayness in general, or which includes a primary or secondary character who was originally written as gay and whose gayness matters to the storyline.
The OP example, not so much.... they're just inserting it just to be doing it, to be "down with the struggle", even though it doesn't fit the story and was no part of the original storyline.
See, there's the issue right there. Gay? You don't fit unless you have to fit. But heterosexuals can be depicted as heterosexual all day long even when it's "not important to the story."
Sometimes people are just gay. It's not a gay agenda to depict Henchman #34 flirting with another dude right before the hero drops out of the air duct and shoots him. Out of the 150 henchman hired by Dr. LaserKill, some of them are probably gay. That's reality.
Why is it a deliberate choice to include homosexuality but not a deliberate choice to include heterosexuality? They're all writing/directing choices, and picking one or the other doesn't matter to the story. So why only complain about the one?
Kind of a weak come back to pretend you know what i like. But then when all you have to back you is an emotional plea then what could anyone else expect from you.
So would you prefer there be a sex scene with two dudes or would you prefer there not be a sex scene with two dudes?
Then why do you want to watch movies with dudes making out? You either enjoy it or you're just being PC because apparently being PC is cool on the left. What exactly is your motivation here?
I did not say anything about what i do. You just make **** up because it is your best shot at ignoring the hypocrisy of those who dislike homosexuality but will only apply the hate to men.
I would prefer that all the silly whining stop.
I'm not ignoring that it's different for people. That has been a well known fact for a very long time now.
You are ignoring the fact that you apply sexism to your thinking. Homosexuality is disgusting you shout, but only when men do it, you whisper.
See, there's the issue right there. Gay? You don't fit unless you have to fit. But heterosexuals can be depicted as heterosexual all day long even when it's "not important to the story."
Sometimes people are just gay. It's not a gay agenda to depict Henchman #34 flirting with another dude right before the hero drops out of the air duct and shoots him. Out of the 150 henchman hired by Dr. LaserKill, some of them are probably gay. That's reality.
Why is it a deliberate choice to include homosexuality but not a deliberate choice to include heterosexuality? They're all writing/directing choices, and picking one or the other doesn't matter to the story. So why only complain about the one?
I don't have a problem with "diversity characters" but it's the way they publicize it.
Just put him the movie and don't make a stink about it.
See, there's the issue right there. Gay? You don't fit unless you have to fit. But heterosexuals can be depicted as heterosexual all day long even when it's "not important to the story."
Sometimes people are just gay. It's not a gay agenda to depict Henchman #34 flirting with another dude right before the hero drops out of the air duct and shoots him. Out of the 150 henchman hired by Dr. LaserKill, some of them are probably gay. That's reality.
Why is it a deliberate choice to include homosexuality but not a deliberate choice to include heterosexuality? They're all writing/directing choices, and picking one or the other doesn't matter to the story. So why only complain about the one?
Seriously? When the original story didn't have a gay character and you decide to include one there is no doubt that is a deliberate attempt to cram homosexuality in the story.
None of Disney's adaptations of fairy tales or novels are true to the original stories. Being gay adds depth to the Le Fou character - which is a Disney creation - and explains his infatuation with Gaston.
So I'm guessing being a side kick and hanging out with another dude makes you gay. Interesting logic from Disney there. Wrong, but interesting.
Have you ever heard of the term "character motivation?"
'Beauty and the Beast's 'exclusively gay moment' will be a Disney first, director tells magazine
'Beauty and the Beast's 'exclusively gay moment' will be a Disney first, director tells magazine | Tampa Bay Times
Why? Was the part of the real org story?
They just have to shove gayness down Americas mouth!
Side kicks are not side kicks because they're gay. The entire line of reasoning is stupid. It reminds me of the idiocy around Robin. lol
So I'm guessing being a side kick and hanging out with another dude makes you gay. Interesting logic from Disney there. Wrong, but interesting.
If you don't like the character then don't watch the movie.
Being a sidekick for no reason other than being a sidekick is not good character motivation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?