• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Baton Rouge Police Shot

He's a BLM/Muslim terrorist, is the point.

This is why arguing with you is utterly exasperating. He specifically states that he is not affiliated with anyone -- yet you continue to affiliate him with a group you don't like. Because you're as dishonest as is humanly possible.
 
This is why arguing with you is utterly exasperating. He specifically states that he is not affiliated with anyone -- yet you continue to affiliate him with a group you don't like. Because you're as dishonest as is humanly possible.


You can't break my argument. That's why you're frustrated. It's understandable.
 
How the **** do I know?

He quite obviously chose Baton Rouge because of the recent incident there. However, that still doesn't mean he didn't come to that decision on his own without influence from "BLM's rhetoric." I honestly don't understand why you can't comprehend this.

If this is about the Baton Rouge shooter, he was - according to what's been found so far - a complete and utter nutcase who, like the complete and utter nutcase who shot cops in Dallas - had easy access to firearms:

Long also went by the name Cosmo Setepenra, and had at least two websites where he described himself as a "Freedom Strategist, Mental Game Coach, Nutritionist, Author and Spiritual Advisor," according to a CNN review of the websites.

In addition, Long followed several conspiracy groups devoted to government surveillance and monitoring. CNN found that an email address linked to Long showed he was a member of a support group in an organization called Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, whose mission is to help those "Marginalized and abused by... Remote Brain experimentation, Remote Neural Monitoring of an entire Humans Body."


But noooooo...instead of addressing the real problem - crazy-assed nutcases with easy access to firearms - we MUST assume that he was all about BLM and killing white cops because they're white cops!
 
...and justifiable shooting, lately, it seems.




Apparently all white cop -> black suspect shootings are unjustified, because racism.
 
The police are part of the government so they are also attacking the police and no... it is accurate, not backwards. The police get their funding directly from local, state and federal departments that are also part of the government. Place people in jail after going to court... both also part of the government... see how this works? Just admit you are wrong and move on.

Whatever, we're just going around in librologic.

We'll take this up again when BLM starts attacking the Dept of Free Stuff.
 
Motivated by similar outrage, perhaps, but not actually representing the movement.

The issue for me is BLM has continually made baseless allegations towards ALL officers and one leader said LE is like the KKK.

Initially I had thought it was civil rights movement that cared about black lives and would collaborate to support and and give oversight.

Instead any criminal thug involved with police ( and I am NOT not saying all incidents of victims of shootings were thugs) BLM will not be logical or inquisitive and now is demonizing the 99% of officers who risk their life daily to protect all races, communities and businesses.

BLM seems to be emulating that rare officer who is a criminal and I now have moved my position to say BLM is a hate group and possibly a terrorist group.

I am not a racist.

I support civil rights. I do not support BLM.

I get it that a rare officer has acted criminally and should be charged. ( sorry folks yet Micheal Brown was a thug who robbed a convenience store and and endangered other citizens and then tried to pull a cops gun and shoot). That was justified. Some were not so. Case by case.

I DO NOT support inciting violence and assignations towards the thousands of professional officers that defend and protect our communities.

Case by cace is the only way and communities and law enforcement collaborating to make citizens and officers safer is the only solution.
 
How the **** do I know?

He quite obviously chose Baton Rouge because of the recent incident there. However, that still doesn't mean he didn't come to that decision on his own without influence from "BLM's rhetoric." I honestly don't understand why you can't comprehend this.



He is clearly a symptom and consequence of the atmosphere of race-based anti-cop radicalism, of which BLM is also a major part, and clearly a major influence overall.


You can't pretend none of this is connected, because it is.
 
You can't break my argument. That's why you're frustrated. It's understandable.

I can't break the wall of dishonesty you've surrounded yourself with.
 
And the republican leadership has don't what? Whine and stomp their feet?

Huh? Has don't what....what does that mean?

The Republican leadership has called out the ridiculous screams of "gun control" running like diarrhea from the mouths of the Dems. They called out their fellow lawmakers for lying about "Hands up, don't shoot". Some of them called out the problems with blacks shooting blacks. What else were they supposed to do?
 
Is that all you got out of that?

It's what stuck out to me. Their logic in figuring out how many sovereign citizens there are ignores that there are people from different ideologies opposed to certain kinds of taxation or taxation in general. There are also different reasons someone might protest a given tax and refuse to pay it.
 
If I understand it correctly, many of the people who are claiming BLM motivates people to do this are the same people who spout "solely individual responsibility" in other scenarios.

I don't know. I'm not analyzing the posting history of every poster.

What I do know is some people are absolutely determined to completely absolve BLM, black leadership, hell, Al Sharpton even for having even a little bit of influence. No, the rhetoric had no influence over the guy who ambushed and shot 2 police officers sitting in their car in NYC last year. No, the rhetoric had no influence over the jackass in Dallas last week. No, the rhetoric had no influence over this guy today.

There has been a lot of dishonesty in this thread from some on the right. There has been just as much from some on the left.

For years we've been hearing about how dangerous Rush Limbaugh's and Sean Hannity's and Sarah Palin's and Glenn Beck's rhetoric was, and how an old flag had to be removed because it inspired people, and now how Donald Trump gins up hate and anger. Yet some want to completely absolve BLM and black leaders and probably even that idiot governor in MN who made the statement that white officers kill people strictly because they're black.

It's shocking to say the least.
 
Last edited:
Kinda hard to believe that people are arguing that these cop-killings are not due to BlackLivesMatter.

Think: if there were no BlackLivesMatter.......would these cops be alive? Most likely, because BLM has churned up a firestorm of hate toward cops.

And 98% of it is based on totally justified killings of thugs by cops.
 
that idiot governor in MN who made the statement that black officers kill people strictly because they're black.

I think you mean white officers kill blacks.

The interesting thing was that the governor was pandering to a BLM crowd and they immediately spit in his kindly white face......calling him names and saying he was all talk and never actually did anything for black people.

He's really a good guy, but he's getting old and somewhat hampered by an aging brain and a soft heart.

It was hard to watch him stand there and be verbally abused by a BLM loudmouth and just take it when he should have just told them to go to hell.
 
Last edited:
Kinda hard to believe that people are arguing that these cop-killings are not due to BlackLivesMatter.

Think: if there were no BlackLivesMatter.......would these cops be alive? Most likely, because BLM has churned up a firestorm of hate toward cops.

And 98% of it is based on totally justified killings of thugs by cops.

You think people didn't hate cops enough to take shots at them before BLM existed?
 
I can't break the wall of dishonesty you've surrounded yourself with.

You can't refute the facts. 9n a scale of 1-to-10, how pissed off are you that the cop shooter turned out to be a BLM terrorist?
 
If this is about the Baton Rouge shooter, he was - according to what's been found so far - a complete and utter nutcase who, like the complete and utter nutcase who shot cops in Dallas - had easy access to firearms:

Long also went by the name Cosmo Setepenra, and had at least two websites where he described himself as a "Freedom Strategist, Mental Game Coach, Nutritionist, Author and Spiritual Advisor," according to a CNN review of the websites.

In addition, Long followed several conspiracy groups devoted to government surveillance and monitoring. CNN found that an email address linked to Long showed he was a member of a support group in an organization called Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, whose mission is to help those "Marginalized and abused by... Remote Brain experimentation, Remote Neural Monitoring of an entire Humans Body."


But noooooo...instead of addressing the real problem - crazy-assed nutcases with easy access to firearms - we MUST assume that he was all about BLM and killing white cops because they're white cops!

So why didn't he go to Dallas? Or DeathCon 7? Or Oz?
 
I don't know. I'm not analyzing the posting history of every poster.

What I do know is some people are absolutely determined to completely absolve BLM, black leadership, hell, Al Sharpton even for having even a little bit of influence. No, the rhetoric had no influence over the guy who ambushed and shot 2 police officers sitting in their car in NYC last year. No, the rhetoric had no influence over the jackass in Dallas last week. No, the rhetoric had no influence over this guy today.

There has been a lot of dishonesty in this thread from some on the right. There has been just as much from some on the left.

For years we've been hearing about how dangerous Rush Limbaugh's and Sean Hannity's and Sarah Palin's and Glenn Beck's rhetoric was, and how an old flag had to be removed because it inspired people, and now how Donald Trump gins up hate and anger. Yet some want to completely absolve BLM and black leaders and probably even that idiot governor in MN who made the statement that black officers kill people strictly because they're black.

It's shocking to say the least.

Sorry, but BLM will never be able to roll back the chants of "dead cops!" Or "fry 'em like bacon". It's on videotape. ;)
 
And the republican leadership has don't what? Whine and stomp their feet?

Why don't Liberals ever get pissed about white people getting shot by cops?
 
Back
Top Bottom