• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Banning "To Kill a Mockingbird" (1 Viewer)

independentusa

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
14,607
Reaction score
9,305
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I have always been amazed at what people find offensive in certain books and want them banned. The Book, "To Kill a Mockingbird seems to head the list. I do not know if you have ever read it or seen the movie, but it is about the trial and conviction of a black man in the South coming from point of view of the daughter of the white lawyer who defends him. The lawyer proves beyond a doubt that the man is innocent and yet he is convicted to save the reputation of a white woman. It uses language that blacks find offensive and a point of view toward the whit epeople of the town that whites find portrays them in a bad light. So now once again school boards and even town libraries are banning the book, or limiting who can get the book. We have become a nation that is no longer able to look at itself and its history. In that way we have become a nation of pansies and are teaching our children to be the same.
 
I have always been amazed at what people find offensive in certain books and want them banned. The Book, "To Kill a Mockingbird seems to head the list. I do not know if you have ever read it or seen the movie, but it is about the trial and conviction of a black man in the South coming from point of view of the daughter of the white lawyer who defends him. The lawyer proves beyond a doubt that the man is innocent and yet he is convicted to save the reputation of a white woman. It uses language that blacks find offensive and a point of view toward the whit epeople of the town that whites find portrays them in a bad light. So now once again school boards and even town libraries are banning the book, or limiting who can get the book. We have become a nation that is no longer able to look at itself and its history. In that way we have become a nation of pansies and are teaching our children to be the same.
No one should be able to decide for others what to read
 
I have always been amazed at what people find offensive in certain books and want them banned. The Book, "To Kill a Mockingbird seems to head the list. I do not know if you have ever read it or seen the movie, but it is about the trial and conviction of a black man in the South coming from point of view of the daughter of the white lawyer who defends him. The lawyer proves beyond a doubt that the man is innocent and yet he is convicted to save the reputation of a white woman. It uses language that blacks find offensive and a point of view toward the whit epeople of the town that whites find portrays them in a bad light. So now once again school boards and even town libraries are banning the book, or limiting who can get the book. We have become a nation that is no longer able to look at itself and its history. In that way we have become a nation of pansies and are teaching our children to be the same.
Where is the book being banned?

Edit- A quick Google says it sometimes gets banned from elementary and middle schools because of rape and racial slurs that are considered inappropriate for young children. Biloxi, Mississippi being the first result of my Google search.
 
Last edited:
No one should be able to decide for others what to read
Some books are considered by schools to be innapropriate for young children. Some literature available in high schools is banned from elementary schools.
 
I have always been amazed at what people find offensive in certain books and want them banned. The Book, "To Kill a Mockingbird seems to head the list. I do not know if you have ever read it or seen the movie, but it is about the trial and conviction of a black man in the South coming from point of view of the daughter of the white lawyer who defends him. The lawyer proves beyond a doubt that the man is innocent and yet he is convicted to save the reputation of a white woman. It uses language that blacks find offensive and a point of view toward the whit epeople of the town that whites find portrays them in a bad light. So now once again school boards and even town libraries are banning the book, or limiting who can get the book. We have become a nation that is no longer able to look at itself and its history. In that way we have become a nation of pansies and are teaching our children to be the same.
******s is the more accurate term. Your welcome.
 
There was a guy a few years back who wanted Fahrenheit 451 banned because he claimed it was anti-Christian because it talked about burning the Bible.

Some people are nuts.
Some?!? 🤨
 
It was first published in the summer of 1960. 61 years later it's deemed inappropriate?
It's been controversial since it's been published.
 
It probably wasn't put in elementary school libraries in some places in 1961 either.
I think the movie was rated 'pg' too.
If memory serves they hadn't yet come up with movie ratings yet when that movie was released.

At least not any ratings we're used to seeing today.
 
The lord of the rings trilogy was in my middle school library. As was Roots.
 
If memory serves they hadn't yet come up with movie ratings yet when that movie was released.

At least not any ratings we're used to seeing today.
Must be how it was rated when ratings came in. Something that Google brought up said it was PG.

Here it is...

Have to scroll down to...
"Why is To Kill A Mockingbird rated PG? To Kill A Mockingbird is rated PG by the MPAA"
 
It probably wasn't put in elementary school libraries in some places in 1961 either.
I think the movie was rated 'pg' too.

I doubt it's being put in elementary school libraries now.
If I am proven wrong, that's worth more than an arched eyebrow...who's bright idea was that?
 
Stupid stupid stupid. Repukes apparently do not know what reading is about, don't know what learning is and are about as clueless on this topic as they are on just about everything else.

But "racial prejudice, injustice and just plain dumbassery" are behind us. Ah-huh.
 
Just a few days ago To Kill a Mockingbird was voted the best book of the last 125 years by readers of the NYT.


In October, as we marked the Book Review’s 125th anniversary, we invited readers to nominate the best book published during that time. This was a nod to our history: In its first few decades, the Book Review often asked readers to anoint the best books, the best short stories, the best poems. We wanted this project, like those early ones, to reflect readers’ tastes and preferences.
Responses began pouring in from all 50 states and 67 countries. In November, we presented a list of the 25 most-nominated books (one per author) for a vote. After tallying more than 200,000 ballots, the winner, by a narrow margin, is …

THE WINNER​

To Kill a Mockingbird​

By Harper Lee

It amazes me that it would be "banned" in some places.

I saw Jeff Daniels play Atticus on Broadway just before the pandemic shut things down. Amazing performance that played to full houses night after night.
 
No one should be able to decide for others what to read
Was someone trying to force others to read a book?? Or just revoking the opportunity to read a book?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom