• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bail Fail Stories

These threads never construct the actual argument. It's all left to implication based on the anecdote.

The anecdote is always "I found this one instance in which someone got bail and then went a'criming" If that's all you offer, you necessarily leave your principals dialed to 11. The direct implication is that people who were arrested for the original crime or something like it should not have had the option of posting bail.

That would not be a mere repudiation of bail reform. It'd be an expansion of what we had!

One of the most grotesque problems with bail is in relation to our leading the world in incarceration rate. There's no room in court or in jail. Cases take a while. We deliberately underfund the courts, then underfund public defense even harder. "Underfund" isn't the right word. So what are you going to do as a poor guy who's holding onto his job for dear life, is living behind-bills to behind-bills, etc?

A lot of people might say "I'd stay and fight! On principle!" They're probably thinking of their assets, and fact that they won't have to ever prove it because they'll be able to post bail. Let's be honest. Unless you actually have completely and utterly ruined yourself in a bet for freedom and you lived it until you clawed out, you have no idea what you'd do. And you wouldn't. Choice:

- Cop to misdemeanor (say, resisting arrest, maybe disorderly, or maybe a minor drug charge) and get out so you can maybe try to keep your job, while making sure you have your belongings, apartment, GFs/fiances/wives, etc.
- Demand your right to a speedy trial and wait for six months. Or a year. Or whatever. Because all sorts of actions by a defendant toll the speedy trial requirement, and the government also has a number of ways to force defendants into a position where they'll do one of those things if they wouldn't anyway.




But things are scary. It's easier to attack bail on a bet that it won't happen to you or your own. If you're of means, you're going to be able to post bail in all but the most gruesome cases filed against rich people. It's only those people who plead despite innocence so they can keep at least a little bit of their lives.

Excellent post.

The only thing I disagree with is that these things are "scary."

They're not.

Every Western nation state has devolved into a nanny state and it's getting perpetually worse.

Everyone deserves bail.

Law enforcement in The West is for cowards.
 
So is the OP arguing that there should be no bail/bond options? Just sit in a jail for a year or so until your trial?

Having LEOs act as judge, jury and executioner is far more cost effective I guess.

People who bitch about crime in The West are unilateral ******s.
 
Having LEOs act as judge, jury and executioner is far more cost effective I guess.

People who bitch about crime in The West are unilateral ******s.
So law abiding citizens and victims of crime shouldn't "bitch" about crime? What?! Should we celebrate it instead? I don't understand your point. Are you trying to say that we should just feel lucky that we live in a first-world country and that "some crime" is just a small nuisance to our lavish life?
 
So is the OP arguing that there should be no bail/bond options? Just sit in a jail for a year or so until your trial?
People accused of specific violent crimes, or those who have prior convictions for violent crimes should not be granted bail IMHO
 
Can you figure it out from the context clues?
Oh I know what you were alluding to, I just wanted to see if you would just come out and say it.
 
People accused of specific violent crimes, or those who have prior convictions for violent crimes should not be granted bail IMHO
So any political figure or police figure with an axe to grind can more or less lock you up indefinitely.

Sounds like a great plan.
 
So any political figure or police figure with an axe to grind can more or less lock you up indefinitely.

Sounds like a great plan.
No. It has nothing to do with that. A man with a prior conviction for domestic abuse who is arrested for domestic battery should not get bail. Why do you disagree? We see what happens again and again when violent criminals are released. They either go out and re-offend or dont show up for court or both. Do you have a better plan?
 
No. It has nothing to do with that. A man with a prior conviction for domestic abuse who is arrested for domestic battery should not get bail. Why do you disagree? We see what happens again and again when violent criminals are released. They either go out and re-offend or dont show up for court or both. Do you have a better plan?

Okay, so you're in the guilty until proven innocent camp. Good to know.
 
Okay, so you're in the guilty until proven innocent camp. Good to know.
Not for all who are accused, no. So you think anyone, even those with past convictions for violent felonies, should be granted bail. Okay, so you're in the I'm on the side of violent criminals camp. Good to know.
 
Not for all who are accused, no. So you think anyone, even those with past convictions for violent felonies, should be granted bail. Okay, so you're in the I'm on the side of violent criminals camp. Good to know.
Bail can be, and is, withheld for people who are considered a present threat to the public.

What are you going on about?
 
Illinois has an end to cash bail coming up. Expect more Bail Fail horror stories from Illinois in the future.
 
Illinois has an end to cash bail coming up. Expect more Bail Fail horror stories from Illinois in the future.
Why is it that liberal / progressives / Democrats can't realize when one of their public policies in abject failure and continue 'repeating the same thing expecting different results' (definition of insanity)?

I seem to recall that Illinois law enforcement is in revolt over this, if they all quit, who's going to 'protect and serve'? Anyone? It isn't Illinois politicians, clearly. May very well be yet another leftist state where reasonable people exodus, like California.
 
Another preview of life in Illinois following the official start of the SAFE-T Act:

 
A thread for those stories where some state's "bail reform" or some criminal-coddling DA/Judge with a soft spot for crumbs of society has led to disaster.


Our first contestant is a crumb out on bail for robbery. Prosecutors asked for $100K, but a ***** judge kicked it down to $20K. Now free, our story's antagonist decided to climb the criminal ladder to the level of "assault & deadly weapon possession". And to show he's an egotistical freak, he's posting stuff on Instagram while on the run.
You really dont seem to understand what bail is. Not surprising for internet tough guys.
 
Yes, how can anyone prove they won't re-offend?
If I was a criminal and had just got out of prison I could do everything they ask and look totally rehabilitated but what's actually stopping me from then going on a crime spree and stealing every football teams trophies and putting them in the trophy cabinet of my favourite team to make it look like they're the best team ever?

By the way that would totally be my crime spree if I was forced to go on one.
Wha? I love armchair criminal psychologists. They are about as lolzworthy as body language experts.
 
A known flight risk given bail now can't be found...

Fox news does love the flashy dramatics but lets get real about what the system is and how supposedly charging a poor person thousands of dollars makes it work any better. You got the floor.
 
Fox news does love the flashy dramatics but lets get real about what the system is and how supposedly charging a poor person thousands of dollars makes it work any better. You got the floor.
So you have no problem letting a criminal who is a known flight risk out on bail?
 
So you have no problem letting a criminal who is a known flight risk out on bail?
Tell me how charging more than someone can afford makes a difference. Not like they are going to be able to cough it up. I’d love to know.

Im setting the flight risk question aside momentarily even though it is the core of the issue when deciding whether or not to set bail in the first place
 
Back
Top Bottom