- I've enjoyed these popcorn ready train wrecks of threads lately.
BTW, it is galactically ignorant to assume there were not abortions before Roe v Wade, and even worse to assume that post some decision that nullifies Roe v Wade all of a sudden abortions will stop. Applying law like this to an obvious social and economic fault always backfires, with our on nation's history illustrating time and time again we need something other than 'do not do this' laws.
The harsh truth here is acceptance of what usually deals best with these sort of things, and that is education and basic knowledge.
The more we are open about sexuality, communication, pregnancy prevention, personal responsibility, social consciousness, what have you the more likely we are not going to need Roe v Wade or overturning Roe v Wade mentality.
Using the death of a justice to amplify the polarization of the abortion debate is also galactically ignorant. "Murder" and "innocent baby killing' and whatever else is just the emotion of the debate, there is an answer and looking to today's political climate to be the end all of this issue is foolish. Going with the religious debate also amplifies the division and solves nothing.
There is a better way, and it is not that complicated.