She’s been a circuit court judge for three years, and has been involved in the legal profession for over 20 years. I’m sure you can find some proof in any of her court opinions or other writings to support your assertion.
You linked to a bunch of opinion pieces warning democrats to not attack her religion and children. Do you have any actual examples of mainstream democrats attacking her religion or children? I’m not interested in your wishcasting.
No one accused Squee’s best friend of being a gang rapist. Just a rapist.
Name it.We have plenty to attack her for from what she said 5 years ago.
Not like rightest filth who want to go back to women staying in the kitchen and obeying their husbands in all thinkings. Being a Catholic I know about the group she belongs to and that is their philosophy. And the group she belongs to is one of the basis for the Handmaids Tale.
They are not opinion pieces. If you had actually read them they were reports of leftist filth attacking the Supreme Court nominee. Like this one:
However, Newsweek left their lies about Barrett on Twitter intact:
Once again proving that the media in the US is truly the enemy of the people. As are all leftist filth.
Dianne - that brave senator from Cali - wouldn't dare say it if Amy was a Muslim or black or a lesbian or Jewish. Christian? Who gives a ****!Dianne Feinstein did on her earlier confirmation. Saying to the effect that she was "deep in dogma". That is an almost textbook attack on a person's religion.
Ibram X. Kendi
@DrIbram
Some White colonizers "adopted" Black children. They "civilized" these "savage" children in the "superior" ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity. https://twitter.com/jennybethm/status/1309653952682754056…
Ibram X. Kendi
@DrIbram
Replying to @DrIbram
And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.
2:11 PM · Sep 26, 2020
That's exactly what he's arguing. This idiot is a prominent thought leader and one of the drivers of "critical race theory".So basically, this asswipe is complaining about a White couple adopting poor "children of color" from one of the most corrupt, poverty-stricken nations on Earth and bringing them to live in a nation that allows them a chance at a life of opportunities?
Just think... you get to enjoy her for DECADES to come. Nothing you can do except learn to like it. Enjoy Auntie. Enjoy.The right wing screamosphere keeps insisting this is a thing that’s going on. I have yet to see it. Does anyone have any legit instances of this?
TWitter randos, message board randos (like me!) don’t count. Op ed columnists do not count. Sorry, but if we’re gonna play that game all day then there’s no reason we can’t take any handful of rando cons on this board and say “Here is the official GOP response to...”
So? Anyone?
Just think... you get to enjoy her for DECADES to come. Nothing you can do except learn to like it. Enjoy Auntie. Enjoy.
Damn right they're going to attack her religion and her family. The Democrats are desperate and aren't afraid to to let the people know what honorless scumbags they really are.
That is theocracy, plain and simple, and it is wholly incompatible with EVERYTHING a free and democratic constitutional republic stands for. Her faith commands her to actually use the Constitution, to destroy the Constitution.
So nothing yet.
Dianne Feinstein did on her earlier confirmation. Saying to the effect that she was "deep in dogma". That is an almost textbook attack on a persons religion.
Don't believe me look it up.
Wake up! It's been going on.
The OP wants examples of people attacking Barrett's religion and family but conveniently excludes places where people are attacking Barrett's religion and family. Hilarious.
Wake up! It's been going on.