ocean515
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 36,760
- Reaction score
- 15,468
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
To the bolded: Nor did I intend to imply you did.
But Trump skirts the edge of Constitutionality on occasion (his earlier claims of a religious entrance test - he's recently walked that back a bit). Even if the majority seem to want something, it cannot be given unless Constitutional - or they need to change the Constitution.
I've been referring to the process of selection. It seems to me Trump, in his typical ineloquent style, floats many ideas in the roughest of context. That doesn't mean the principle behind the idea is necessarily unconstitutional, or traitorous. When it comes to "entrance tests" the US already applies them. Fail them, and one can't enter.
The principle Trump seems to voicing in the area you mentioned is one that adds a necessary level to the test, in order to address a real problem. How that looks in final version should be the conversation, rather than the distraction invented to avoid addressing the issue at all.