- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 16,164
- Reaction score
- 5,060
- Location
- St Thomas, VI
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I think it's hilarious. Deadspin finally put up the voicemails and pictures today, for anyone who's dying to see Old Man Favre sans Wranglers.
Hasn't he announced that he is retiring from this sort of thing?
give him a break
as a QB he is used to getting sacked
Maybe he'll finally be kicked the curb, but I doubt it.
On another note - I almost never get x-rated pictures sent to me. What the hell! :waiting:
Meh. Hardly a big deal. Show me one man out there, pro athlete or not, who doesn't get a kick out of showing another chick his junk.
Any dude who says no is lying.
Meh. Hardly a big deal. Show me one man out there, pro athlete or not, who doesn't get a kick out of showing another chick his junk.
Any dude who says no is lying.
Meh. Hardly a big deal. Show me one man out there, pro athlete or not, who doesn't get a kick out of showing another chick his junk.
Any dude who says no is lying.
Regardless, this story is packed full of holes. I need to see that proof myself.
The woman has zero credibility. She's just a Maxim model and Playboy flavor of the month that gets hired by a franchise to look good. It's the Erin Andrews school of thought.
Women like that with zero credentials shouldn't even be brought into the hyper-macho world like that. They just cause trouble.
And why do you judge without evidence? I've seen absolutely no pictures, heard no credible testimony to the point, and essentially it's a he-said-she-said between the NFL's favorite everyman and a couple women who are, at best, ethically questionable.
Plus, I notice the hypocrisy of a former Playboy model like Sterger trying to throw stones about an alleged player whipping out his junk for others to see.
Regardless, this story is packed full of holes. I need to see that proof myself.
The woman has zero credibility. She's just a Maxim model and Playboy flavor of the month that gets hired by a franchise to look good. It's the Erin Andrews school of thought.
Women like that with zero credentials shouldn't even be brought into the hyper-macho world like that. They just cause trouble.
I've heard the voice mails too. Some junk about wanting her to come over. That's it. Anything sexual from that conversation is implied by those who want to believe it to be so.
And yes, I think women who pose in skimpy outfits in Maxim or nothing at all in Playboy are ethically questionable.
USA-1 said:The story is true and Favre doesn't deny it.
He crossed the line when he sent her three pictures of his unit. Not to mention they were both employees of the Jets at the time.
Last I checked, he doesn't confirm it either. That's how these highly publicized cases go.
Although I'm not sure about the voice mails, the pictures have not been confirmed for authenticity by anyone except the TMZ wannabe that's paying the Playboy model for her story. Also, she hasn't pressed any charges and none of the other women not only have not pressed charges either, but will not make themselves known. They're slinging arrows from the shadows. Sorry, not good enough to me. Additionally, this happened two years ago. What's the matter - it took her a couple dozen months to negotiate the money she'd receive for "leaking" this story?
Let me guess - you also think that stupid Colorado girl went up to Kobe's room for fresh towels and an autograph, right?
How wil they prove the package is his. I suppose:The story is true and Favre doesn't deny it.
How wil they prove the package is his. I suppose:
1. Appear in court
2. Drop trousers.
3. Hold pictures up to package
4. Take measurements
5. Hope, for prosecution's sake, weather conditions were similar to time of original sexting.
Reminds me of that scene from the movie Porky's, LOL. If he was smart he'd run out and get it tatooed to create a more difficult match, LOL :bootyshake
He could get it tattooed with "welcome aboard".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?