Andrew Breitbart scores knock out vs. Liberal Protesters.

[Grim17]

Sure, if he actually had the entire video. I don't believe he did.

No he didn't have the entire video. He also didn't edit it, it was sent to him that way.

What amazes me, is that people still believe that Breitbart posted that video to attack Sherrot, when he only posted it to point out the lack of reaction from the NAACP audience, when she admitted to discriminating against someone based on their race.

But hey, I expect the left to use any excuse they can to avoid dealing with the contents of the video, which for the most part, they have.

 

[Coronado]

But hey, I expect the left to use any excuse they can to avoid dealing with the contents of the video, which for the most part, they have.

Yeah, nobody on the right would ever do that.

 

[Deuce]

Did he or did he not walk up to a bunch of assclowns holding signs and ask them pointedly if they had the first clue what their sign said and why they said it? Did said assclowns give an actual response or did they flummer and stumble and blather and then run away calling him gay (hey...isnt that a pretty pathetic, homophobic response?)?

****ing assclowns...

Videotape enough people on any side of any issue and eventually you'll find some morons. I mean, you don't consider that guy with the sign "Descent is the highest form of patriotic" (sic) or "Obama: Half-breed muslin" (sic) to be shining examples of the Tea Party, do you?

Wow. The people who were fired should sue.

Damage already done. ACORN no longer exists as a coherent entity. Congress dumped all their contracts before the investigation was even finished.

 

[Mustachio]

Wow. The people who were fired should sue.

HAHAHAHA! You aren't a very well informed person, are you? THEY DID SUE

 

[Mustachio]

No he didn't have the entire video. He also didn't edit it, it was sent to him that way.

What amazes me, is that people still believe that Breitbart posted that video to attack Sherrot, when he only posted it to point out the lack of reaction from the NAACP audience, when she admitted to discriminating against someone based on their race.

But hey, I expect the left to use any excuse they can to avoid dealing with the contents of the video, which for the most part, they have.

That's a lie. In the article that accompanied the video, about 90% of it was accusing her of being racist and treating people inequally based on race. Then there was a little blurb that said "and the audience actually applauds her racist comments." I know the talking point is to deny Breitbart ever accused her of racism, but it's a lie. Sorry. It's just a lie.

 

[Josie]

HAHAHAHA! You aren't a very well informed person, are you? THEY DID SUE

I did not know that they sued ACORN for wrongful termination. I'll have to look into that.

 

[Grim17]

That's a lie. In the article that accompanied the video, about 90% of it was accusing her of being racist and treating people inequally based on race. Then there was a little blurb that said "and the audience actually applauds her racist comments." I know the talking point is to deny Breitbart ever accused her of racism, but it's a lie. Sorry. It's just a lie.

That video was posted to show the acceptance of racism within the ranks of the NAACP, after they had attacked the Tea Party and falsely accused them of being a racist organization.

 

[Josie]

HAHAHAHA! You aren't a very well informed person, are you? THEY DID SUE

Nope. They never sued for wrongful termination. If you have a source that I can't find, please post it.

They DID sue O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart, but the court dismissed the case.

 

[Deuce]

Nope. They never sued for wrongful termination. If you have a source that I can't find, please post it.

They DID sue O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart, but the court dismissed the case.

Lying, unfortunately, is often ruled to be protected speech, even when it's directly responsible for harm.

The Media Can Legally Lie

Sad, but what's the alternative? Truth police?

 

[VanceMack]

Videotape enough people on any side of any issue and eventually you'll find some morons. I mean, you don't consider that guy with the sign "Descent is the highest form of patriotic" (sic) or "Obama: Half-breed muslin" (sic) to be shining examples of the Tea Party, do you?



Damage already done. ACORN no longer exists as a coherent entity. Congress dumped all their contracts before the investigation was even finished.

edit..cuz the first line was probably a trolling line...

What...you missed the ENTIRE HERD of sheeple being moved back from the barrier because one guy with a camera asked ALL of them a few questions about why they actually held their little premanufactured sign? (oh...Im sorry...one 'gay' guy with a camera...). Then with all the bitching about 'astroturfing, they piled into their little short yellow buses and away they went.

See...this is yet another one of those events where it would be SO EASY for people on both sides to say..."yep...he busted them...this particular group was staged, bussed in, and didn't have the first clue what they were protesting. This doesn't indict EVERY group, but you bet...THAT group ought to be embarrassed" But nope...you cant even admit the blatantly obvious. You HAVE to rush to the knee-jerk ideological defensive posture. THATS pathetic.

 

[Deuce]

Your seat on the short little bus is the third one on the left. Did YOU turn in your sign?

What...you missed the ENTIRE HERD of sheeple being moved back from the barrier because one guy with a camera asked ALL of them a few questions about why they actually held their little premanufactured sign? (oh...Im sorry...one 'gay' guy with a camera...). Then with all the bitching about 'astroturfing, they piled into their little short yellow buses and away they went.

See...this is yet another one of those events where it would be SO EASY for people on both sides to say..."yep...he busted them...this particular group was staged, bussed in, and didn't have the first clue what they were protesting. This doesn't indict EVERY group, but you bet...THAT group ought to be embarrassed" But nope...you cant even admit the blatantly obvious. You HAVE to rush to the knee-jerk ideological defensive posture. THATS pathetic.

My "ideological" defensive posture of "there's morons on both sides of any issue?" Ok then. You understand I was calling these people morons, right?

I've got dozens of photos of completely retarded, often racist Tea Partier signs all from the same event.

Have you watched any videos by that "New Left Media" guy? Nothing but idiots! Surely this means EVERY tea partier is an idiot! :joke: For all you know, a couple guys did come forward with calm, reasonable statements and actually quoted a few hateful things Beck said, but those were edited out. That WOULD be Breitbart's MO, after all.

 

[Grim17]

Videotape enough people on any side of any issue and eventually you'll find some morons.

Eventually?? Some morons?? lmmfao

After Breitbart questioned a few of those Obama/union organized stooges individually and made them look foolish, he asked the entire group collectively if any of them could back up what was written on their signs with facts or truth, and not one of them did. NOT ONE.

They were so collectively clueless, that the people in charge of the protest told everyone to walk away and they ended the protest, because they were looking like such fools in front of the many cameras filming what was going on. Here's an example of just how foolish they were looking:

Breitbart asks: Why are you here?
Protester answers: I'm here to stop Glenn Beck spreading hate
Breitbart asks: Name one... not a hundred... just one example of the hate Glenn Beck's saying or spreading?
Protester answers: (thinking... thinking... thinking) I'm not going to fall into your trap.
Breitbart responds: It's a trap? Truth, is a trap. (and he walks away)​

Let not forget the response he got when he asked them all (since it was an anti-hate protest) how they felt when Kenneth Gladly (a black man) was attacked by SEIU thugs at a Tea Party rally... He was called "gay".

"Some" morons indeed.... lololol

.

 

[VanceMack]

My "ideological" defensive posture of "there's morons on both sides of any issue?" Ok then. You understand I was calling these people morons, right?

I've got dozens of photos of completely retarded, often racist Tea Partier signs all from the same event.

Have you watched any videos by that "New Left Media" guy? Nothing but idiots! Surely this means EVERY tea partier is an idiot! :joke: For all you know, a couple guys did come forward with calm, reasonable statements and actually quoted a few hateful things Beck said, but those were edited out. That WOULD be Breitbart's MO, after all.

Riiiiight...and you DEMONSTRATE that unbiased posture by wading into this thread posting several times attacking Brietbart and not simply acknowledging that this partuclar group of morons were nothing more than a manufactured accumulation of people in a manufactured protest and pretty much represented exactly what he said they represented. Okie dokie then...

 

[Deuce]

Eventually?? Some morons?? lmmfao

After Breitbart questioned a few of those Obama/union organized stooges individually and made them look foolish, he asked the entire group collectively if any of them could back up what was written on their signs with facts or truth, and not one of them did. NOT ONE.

They were so collectively clueless, that the people in charge of the protest told everyone to walk away and they ended the protest, because they were looking like such fools in front of the many cameras filming what was going on. Here's an example of just how foolish they were looking:

Breitbart asks: Why are you here?
Protester answers: I'm here to stop Glenn Beck spreading hate
Breitbart asks: Name one... not a hundred... just one example of the hate Glenn Beck's saying or spreading?
Protester answers: (thinking... thinking... thinking) I'm not going to fall into your trap.
Breitbart responds: It's a trap? Truth, is a trap. (and he walks away)​

Let not forget the response he got when he asked them all (since it was an anti-hate protest) how they felt when Kenneth Gladly (a black man) was attacked by SEIU thugs at a Tea Party rally... He was called "gay".

"Some" morons indeed.... lololol

.

So are you literally debating semantics or are you implying that all liberals are like this? Because if I were present I could certainly name some hateful things Beck said or some lies he's told.

 

[pbrauer]

This is one of the most incredible videos I've seen in a long time. Andrew Breitbart confronted the dozens of protesters outside the Right Nation event last Saturday, and for lack of a better description, single handedly destroyed them.

He discredited the protesters and showed them up so badly, that the leader of the group ordered them to all walk away from the protest to avoid Breitbart's questions (questions none of them could answer). When Breitbart wouldn't go away and continued to confront them, they ended up calling the protest off, getting back on the buses that shipped them in, and going home.

This was a brilliant display of how one man, armed with nothing but the truth, can take the wind out of the sails of an entire group of people.

Check it out.

These protesters remind me of the Tea Party protestors that were organized to disrupt the town halls meetings about the healthcare system. They didn't know what they were protesting either.

Special note about this video. Notice Breitbart had to mention or the put on screen "he's gay" because you couldn't actually hear what these people said even though they had a person taking a video of the whole thing. So did somebody say the N-word to the black congressman?

Also, I'll be willing to bet the American flags these people were carrying were union-made in AMERICA!!!

 

[Mustachio]

Nope. They never sued for wrongful termination. If you have a source that I can't find, please post it.

They DID sue O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart, but the court dismissed the case.

Oh, sorry, I misread what you said. I thought you said why didn't the employees sue O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart if they skewed the facts. And the court rejected that lawsuit because it was filed after the 120 day period, not because it was without merit.

 

[Barbbtx]

You shouldnt...you should go back on the short yellow bus because your protest is over...leave the signs with the nice man with the megaphone...

Leave the American flags that were passed out with him too. No...No... please don't throw them in the trash this time!

 

[Mustachio]

That video was posted to show the acceptance of racism within the ranks of the NAACP, after they had attacked the Tea Party and falsely accused them of being a racist organization.

So let's look at the original article:
We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.

In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.

The second video affirms the real reason there is tension between the Democratic Party and a growing mass of middle Americans — and it’s not because of race.

The NAACP which has transformed from a civil rights group to a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and social-justice politics, supports a new America that relies less on individualism, entrepreneurialism and American grit, but instead giddily embraces, the un-American notion of unaccountability and government dependence. Shirley Sherrod, a federal appointee who oversees over a billion dollars of federal funds, nearly begs black men and women into taking government jobs at USDA — because they won’t get fired.

So there's five paragraphs, in which one sentence refers to the audience. If the reason for the article was showing the audience's reaction, which is the entire article about Sherrod's speech? Have you read the article or are you just repeating what you heard Glenn Beck say?

The first video, it could be argued, was posted to show both Sherrod's racism and the audience's reaction. The second video has nothing to do with the audience and Breitbart's description makes no mention whatsoever of such. He describes its relevance which is entirely based on the content of her speech, which is utter BS in itself.

 

[Josie]

Special note about this video. Notice Breitbart had to mention or the put on screen "he's gay" because you couldn't actually hear what these people said even though they had a person taking a video of the whole thing. !

I heard her say it. It was the women in the red jacket. She said something like "He's gay" and the person next to her said something and then the red jacket lady said "It's the way he talks."

 

[Barbbtx]

Nope. They never sued for wrongful termination. If you have a source that I can't find, please post it.

They DID sue O'Keefe, Giles and Breitbart, but the court dismissed the case.

Are you sure? I just got a plea in the mail for Hannah Giles legal defense fund.

 

[Singularity]

How did I leave it out when I pointed it out my statement? And do you REALLY not believe that to be the case? Were you even following football during that time? the subject of Donovan McNabbs race WAS an issue...it was a CONSTANT, just as it was with Moon...the pressures on a black quarterback to succeed. Limbaugh simply stated the OBVIOUS and that others WERE propping someone up who at the time was truly an above average quarterback and NOTHING more.

Were you even watching football at the time? Rush's statement was obviously racist; everyone at the time was taken aback - not by such a blatant falsehood, but by the fact he mentioned the NFL being desirous of a BLACK quarterback doing well because of some sort of 'social concern'. I remember talking with some friends who lean to the right back then, and they were basically as shocked as anyone else. Limbaugh did not state the obvious. He let fly with a racist statement, and as a result, he was punished accordingly.

I don't listen to his radio show, but I can tell you this. It's one thing to speak his opinion in that format, but if you are going to interject racist social commentary on an NFL football program that conservatives, liberals, black, white, and etc. watch, read, or listen to, then you can expect to be punished for it. And that's exactly what happened.

Black studies intelligencia...thats not 'code' for anything other than what it is. Do you deny that there is a MAJORITY of black leaders who IMMEDIATELY are critical of EVERY conservative black person? That those people IMMEDIATELY infuse race and excuses into the success and/or failings of blacks in America? Please...That blacks CAN progress...succeed in life and that doesnt make them covert white supremacists? Good lord...do you WONDER why so many of the blacks FROM this country fail while so many that come here from other countries succeed? Hell weve seen it here on our little slice of blog paradise when our own black David Duke calls succesful blacks that are conservatives Toms and house negroes.

First off, your claim "do you WONDER why so many of the blacks FROM this country fail while so many that come here from other countries succeed" is blatant racism. You're attempting to peg native-born black people as largely overall unsuccessful, which is not true at all. I'll allow you to retract that statement, as it was obviously typed in haste, and i'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't mean what you typed. But when you say such things, you aren't judging the person, you are judging the color. There is no difference between any of us, and that's exactly what Dyson pointed out. Furthermore, if you had bothered to listen to what he said rather than hurry through and offer up a half-ass defense of Breitbart getting blown out in this debate, you'd have noticed that Dyson would have agreed with you partly on one issue - that blacks as a group are just as capable of racism and the articulation of powerful notions against other black people, the same as whites as a group, or any other race if you want to compartmentalize it in such a manner. People are people, and identity politics is identity politics.

In the future, you may wish to actually listen rather than hastily bang out an unsupported defense of the person whose opinion just got obliterated.

 

[pbrauer]

Eventually?? Some morons?? lmmfao

After Breitbart questioned a few of those Obama/union organized stooges individually and made them look foolish, he asked the entire group collectively if any of them could back up what was written on their signs with facts or truth, and not one of them did. NOT ONE.

They were so collectively clueless, that the people in charge of the protest told everyone to walk away and they ended the protest, because they were looking like such fools in front of the many cameras filming what was going on. Here's an example of just how foolish they were looking:

Breitbart asks: Why are you here?
Protester answers: I'm here to stop Glenn Beck spreading hate
Breitbart asks: Name one... not a hundred... just one example of the hate Glenn Beck's saying or spreading?
Protester answers: (thinking... thinking... thinking) I'm not going to fall into your trap.
Breitbart responds: It's a trap? Truth, is a trap. (and he walks away)​

.

You are the clueless one, Grim, you just don't know human nature very well.
There are not very many people could or willing to answer his questions on the spir of the moment. Breitbart knew that, you don't. They were there to protest, not answer questions. Bet you could not handle it in a similar situation.

Let not forget the response he got when he asked them all (since it was an anti-hate protest) how they felt when Kenneth Gladly (a black man) was attacked by SEIU thugs at a Tea Party rally... He was called "gay".

I've seen the video, it's unclear what happened, I don't believe he was attacked. Why is it important for you mention that he was a black man?

"Some" morons indeed.... lololol

You indeed protest too much!!!

 

[pbrauer]

I heard her say it. It was the women in the red jacket. She said something like "He's gay" and the person next to her said something and then the red jacket lady said "It's the way he talks."

You would have missed it, if they didn't show it onscreen!!

 

[Councilman]

This is one of the most incredible videos I've seen in a long time. Andrew Breitbart confronted the dozens of protesters outside the Right Nation event last Saturday, and for lack of a better description, single handedly destroyed them.

He discredited the protesters and showed them up so badly, that the leader of the group ordered them to all walk away from the protest to avoid Breitbart's questions (questions none of them could answer). When Breitbart wouldn't go away and continued to confront them, they ended up calling the protest off, getting back on the buses that shipped them in, and going home.

This was a brilliant display of how one man, armed with nothing but the truth, can take the wind out of the sails of an entire group of people.

Check it out.

Singularity was straighten out by VanceMack who also got just right.

I have for a long time been saying the best way to handle the Leftist Hate mongers is truth and facts.

This great video shows without any doubt that at least these protesters are no better than Sheeple.

They have no clue and just do as they are told by the Unions and Obama's cadre of henchman and Radical Czars and Advisors.

Those who stand for nothing fall for anything

Excellent find & post Grim17 I only wish I had found it.

Salute

 

[Barbbtx]

He was a Conservative black man attacked by SEIU thugs. He was also called things like Uncle Tom if my memory hasn't failed me.
Now that was HATE and it was coming from the people the protesters were working for.
The buses had Chicago Public School ID tags. My guess is Union.