- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,983
- Reaction score
- 9,129
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Everybody can see that you employ this strategy.Because making **** up is so much more effective at eluding those pesky facts.
It would be better to stick to the facts though.
You are making **** up. "Quashing a non existent affidavit was the other," was never said by Wolfinger. What he actually said was:
I am outraged by the outright lies contained in the letter by Benjamin Crump to Deputy Assistant Attorney General Roy Austin dated April 2, 2012. I encourage the Justice Department to investigate and document that no such meeting or communication occurred.
Ah... helloooooo? Mcfly?
Just what do you think the communication is that's being denied?
That would be to quash, suppress or overrule an alleged affidavit or recommendation.
That is the very communication he is denying.What he disputed was the claim in that letter that he was involved with in a meeting with Lee (and possibly family members of Zimmerman) over communication with Serino about his recommendation to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter. He never denied that Serino filed an affidavit.
That is what this hubbub is all about.
A supposed affidavit.
An affidavit for which there is no evidence that it exists.
:lamoBut let's cut to the chase. You are trying your hardest to dispute the claim that the police department wanted to charge Zimmerman. But Serino, the lead investigator, believed Zimmerman acted unlawfully, wanted him charged with manslaughter, and filed this in an affidavit...
Asked to confirm that the police recommended a manslaughter charge, special prosecutor Angela Corey said: “I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’ The state attorney impaneled a grand jury, but before anything else could be done, the governor stepped in and asked us to pick it up in midstream.”
Read the article and see what is being spoken about.
In this interview Corey is being asked about the alleged "affidavit or recommendation" from "early in the investigation" and she replies with what?
Oh yeah... she said: “I don’t know about that,”.
Did you get that? She said: “I don’t know about that,”.
She then continues without missing a beat, with the following:
“..., but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: [highlight]‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’[/highlight] The state attorney impaneled a grand jury, but before anything else could be done, the governor stepped in and asked us to pick it up in midstream.”
Clearly speaking about what recently happened, immediately before she took over.
And clearly not speaking about an alleged affidavit, recommendation or capias that was supposedly quashed, suppressed or overruled on the first night, because she is talking about what happens at the end of an investigation, not the beginning.
Do you understand that now?
Two separate incidences were being addressed.
You do not know that.The man running the investigation didn't believe Zimmerman's account ... why do you?
You do not know what he believed or what I believe.
lolAnd by the way, you can be certain that Serino will be testifying in court should this case make it to trial.
Big deal? So what?
You think he is going to get on the stand and make **** up like you have been doing? :doh
lol