- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 1,464
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
There's no justifiable reason for mass mail in ballots, and even Dr Faucci and others have stated thats the case, while approving standard, in person voting. Plus, there are many proven cases of mail in voter fraud, mostly involving democrats, many of which involved the cheaters winning office, then later being thrown out of office and successfully prosecuted!
Voter Fraud Is Real—Here's How Democrats Want to Steal the 2020 Election | Opinion
Fifteen Election Results That Were Thrown Out Because of Fraudulent Mail-In Ballots - Tennessee Star
Should we throw out the 2016 election or the 2920 Primary election since there was mail in voting?
Well hopefully by 2920 we'll have mail-in voting worked out.
lol
There's no justifiable reason for mass mail in ballots, and even Dr Faucci and others have stated thats the case, while approving standard, in person voting. Plus, there are many proven cases of mail in voter fraud, mostly involving democrats, many of which involved the cheaters winning office, then later being thrown out of office and successfully prosecuted!
Voter Fraud Is Real—Here's How Democrats Want to Steal the 2020 Election | Opinion
Fifteen Election Results That Were Thrown Out Because of Fraudulent Mail-In Ballots - Tennessee Star
There's no justifiable reason for mass mail in ballots, and even Dr Faucci and others have stated thats the case, while approving standard, in person voting. Plus, there are many proven cases of mail in voter fraud, mostly involving democrats, many of which involved the cheaters winning office, then later being thrown out of office and successfully prosecuted!
Voter Fraud Is Real—Here's How Democrats Want to Steal the 2020 Election | Opinion
Fifteen Election Results That Were Thrown Out Because of Fraudulent Mail-In Ballots - Tennessee Star
edited the post. thanks for the typing check. My keyboard has the 9 by the 0, does yours?:mrgreen:
Well if the post office keeps dumping mail there is a real danger that Trump's Postmaster General steals the election for trump.
There's no justifiable reason for mass mail in ballots, and even Dr Faucci and others have stated thats the case, while approving standard, in person voting. Plus, there are many proven cases of mail in voter fraud, mostly involving democrats, many of which involved the cheaters winning office, then later being thrown out of office and successfully prosecuted!
Voter Fraud Is Real—Here's How Democrats Want to Steal the 2020 Election | Opinion
Fifteen Election Results That Were Thrown Out Because of Fraudulent Mail-In Ballots - Tennessee Star
OK, I take a drug that intentionally depresses my immune system. Should I vote in person or by mail, and who should decide that? What if I care for my 90 year old mother in law? Mail or in person? What if I just visit once per week? Mail or in person? The Democrats' proposal is that I can decide, vote in person OR by mail, and not have to offer a reason. Why is that a problem with you? You have the same choice.
FWIW, it's SAD!!! how big a pathetic, dishonest, shameless hack Gingrich has become. That article was an embarrassment, or should have been. He doesn't like mail in voting, because it will help Democrats. Higher turnout always does. So he alleges Democrats want to "steal" the 2020 election but offers NOTHING to support that bull****.
He's appealing to the idiot, ignorant contingent of the GOP. This crap is exactly why the GOP needs to be burned to the ground and the remains sown with salt. It's shameful behavior from someone who's supposed to be a credible voice for the GOP, but he's not even unusual for the GOP in this era.
Oh, it's Democrats trying to steal the election?
Not the guy who invited and knowingly accepted - and is accepting - help from Russia? Not the guy who started kneecapping USPS once people started talking about using mail-in ballots because of COVID? Right.
Remember folks: when they're accusing the left of something, they're admitting it's what they are doing.
[/url]
Just went through all 15 of the cases mentioned in the Tennessee Star piece. Unless there is something I cannot see behind their stupid Ad attempting to get people to sign up for the paper, every case sighted is either a local mayoral race, a state district race or even a state district primary.
WEAK.....
Even you must know by now that there was nothing to either of these progressive left conspiracy theories pedaled by the MSM to the lemmings who continue to follow them into the abyss.
So you think the same guys that can't run a local mayoral race are going to be able to properly handle mail-in ballots for the Presidential election? It doesn't have to be a conspiracy to make the prospect of millions more mail in ballots being handled by incompetent government employees frightening. If these guys can't run a mayoral race how are you going to have any assurance that the vote is accurate regardless of which way it goes?
They were not issues of "properly handling" the mail, they were instances of purposeful voter fraud.
Oh, it's Democrats trying to steal the election?
Not the guy who invited and knowingly accepted - and is accepting - help from Russia? Not the guy who started kneecapping USPS once people started talking about using mail-in ballots because of COVID? Right.
Remember folks: when they're accusing the left of something, they're admitting it's what they are doing.
The last administration that tried to prove voter fraud came up with less than 150 cases, and something like half of them were in national elections. I think something like 86 of them were technically invalidly cast ballots, but not deliberate fraud. Something like 30% of the total lead to conviction.
This was after the Bush DOJ did a five year deep dive searching for this stuff. It just isn't this big thing, and perps tend to get caught.
In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud - The New York Times
Who paid a foreign agent for a dirty dossier? Who filed fraudulent FISA warrant applications? Who claimed they had evidence to prove Collusion? All of those things would be democrats.
I am sure you will make your own decision. Though my state is offering mail-in this year due to COVID, I will vote in person. I know when to go to my voting station to avoid crowds. I will mask and distance. I have co-morbidities that make this a particular risk in my case as it appears it will be for you if you decide to go. However I thank our voting station workers every election. This year I think I owe it to them to thank them and tell them how proud I am of them. Besides, the US Government is trying to infect me for God sake. If I am going to die from dumbassery, it will be my dumbassery, not Trumpian dumbassery.
I haven't actually decided yet whether to get a mail in ballot or vote in person. I actually have said for years now that I consider my vote on antiquated machines that any competent 10th grader could hack, and that leave ZERO audit trail as more suggestions than anything else, so the prospect of a paper ballot actually increases my confidence my vote will count. I can deliver it to the post office very early, and can track the ballot through the process, until it's accepted by the voting people. So I will KNOW my ballot arrived, or didn't, by election day.
The bigger point is Gingrich and the GOP are spreading obvious lies. It's incredible to me how far the GOP has fallen that the spouse of our ambassador to the Vatican would resort to this dishonest narrative, that Newt knows is dishonest, bull****, lies, but he's lost any sense of shame or integrity, and he's now typical of the GOP in this era. He's got the integrity of a snake, and that's fine with this era's GOP.
I'm just so sick of their bull**** and lies, and until Trump is removed it's only going to get worse. Newt is rewarded with prestige for being a liar, and spreading dishonest nonsense. Trump's GOP cheers him along.
FWIW, as an aside the press is a big part of this problem. I can't believe that nonsense was published in Newsweek with that headline. I guess I'll have to check that off the list of outlets I'll read from here on out. Nothing in the article, not a word, supported the headline's claim, or the parade of lies in the body of that editorial. That Newsweek accepted it is shameful.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?