- Joined
- May 12, 2013
- Messages
- 24,794
- Reaction score
- 22,348
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
So you do expect less from men in military service. Thanks for making your disdain for them clear.
Now there is a standard lowered!!!!!!
So you do expect less from men in military service. Thanks for making your disdain for them clear.
So you do expect less from men in military service. Thanks for making your disdain for them clear.
Lol, how many of these men have beer bellies?
Do you care to tell how I'm wrong? Every last time women were invited to the military ranks throughout history rape became a serious problem far worse than anything seen in society itself.
Are you saying that's a valid argument to bar women from being part of the military?
------------LOL, how many of these women have double D's?
Yes, I am. In fact, I will go so far as to say it was used as a reason to bar women before.
So will a beer belly. That's a spectacularly stupid argument to make.
We've already had at least one woman pass the Q Course. If they can cut it without the standards being lowered, then what's the huge deal?
Don't see to many beer bellies any more in grunt units.
I'd like to see a source on that. I've been through part of the Q Course, and I really don't think that's the case. I can't even think of a reason she'd be there in the first place.
No you won't, because the men and women who apply for such jobs are generally in good shape. You also probably aren't going to see a lot of double d's from female grunts, but you were happy enough to make that assumption, weren't you? Bottom line: if a woman is capable of completing the relevant training, why do you have a problem with that?
Because they are either going to lower the standards for all or have a double standard where females standards are lower than male standards.
That's the way liberal social engineering experimentation works in the military. Always has and always will.
American soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen always bleed and die every time liberals have used the U.S. military for social engineering experimentation.
Well that's a sad, sad, thing. You apparently have so little respect for military men that you can't expect them to behave like rational adults in the real world. That's just insulting. I, and pretty much everyone else in the private sector routinely work with women. This does not cause us to indiscriminately rape every female around us. Why you would expect so much less from military men is beyond me. Frankly it's an attack on our soldiers, and you really ought to be ashamed of yourself. :shrug:
Conspiracy bull**** aside: do you have a problem with women being accepted to such organizations if they meet the standards?
----------------No you won't, because the men and women who apply for such jobs are generally in good shape. You also probably aren't going to see a lot of double d's from female grunts, but you were happy enough to make that assumption, weren't you? Bottom line: if a woman is capable of completing the relevant training, why do you have a problem with that?
You mean facts aside. Not many women are going to meet standards designed for men.
Believe what you will, but history and current stats are on my side. History makes it very clear that having women in the military is very bad idea and current events are showing it all over again. It really doesn't matter if you like that fact or not.
Again: you're arguing that men in the military are, and should be held to lesser standards re: rape than are men in literally every other context. You're insulting military men. If that's your best argument, that's a sad, sad, thing.
Jesus Christ, dude. It's not a matter of dispute, but a matter of fact. Men in the military when in war time or in peacetime have a higher tendency to rape women. I didn't say the facts were pretty and I surely didn't say I wanted to report on them, but they are the facts and they have been the facts since the beginning. People have to stop thinking modern times is the first time we allowed women in the military ranks and they really have to stop thinking they can solve this problem. Rape will always occur at a higher rate in the military than in society just like it has done in every instance throughout history when women were invited. There is no reason to shoot the massager, but to perhaps accept the fact that what you see around the world today is not new nor was it unexpected.
The point that I'm making (and that you're apparently missing) is that the unusual prevalence of rape in the military is not something that should be accepted as a valid reason to prevent women from joining the military, but rather a reason to deal with cultural aspects of the military that lead to rape. I think our military men can do better. Don't you?
Google Capt. Kathleen Wilder.
Facepalm..
No, I do not.
Right. You go ahead and continue to insult our soldiers by expecting them to behave like animals. I'll continue to expect better of them. The next time you talk about the left bashing the military, remember this conversation, because you're the one who thinks so little of them as to accept rape as a common practice.