Whether or not we were taught not to hit girls might matter who who is shooting at our girls, but I seriously doubt it would matter to us on this side.
I would venture to guess on the battlefield we would resort to primal instincts, not societal ones anyway. Its nice knowing that women know more about how a mans mind works than a man does. Amazing, you are amazing!
Who is full of ****, again?
:lamo
Sorry, gonna call this one definitely lost by you.
lol dude you're a ****ing liberal and so is she. You don't count, but you both have something in common: you both think you know how I was raised in society. How about you stay out of it? If your 2 cents is needed you will be notified. Thanks.
Moderator's Warning: |
Roger that. I would advise some pratical guidelines...
- Devise meaningful combat qualification screening for females
- Segregated combat units
- Mobilized female strike forces
Offhand, I can't think of too many other modifications due to gender differences.
See above.
I'll never forget the final ordeal in the Negev to earn my jump-wings and maroon beret.
Maybe someday I'll share that experience.
Are you ****ing kidding me?
Reality check, women cannot, as a general rule, physically handle the rigors of combat. This is why female PRT and male PRT are DIFFERENT. How's the platoon going to handle one or more members unable to carry the normal full load out of equipment into the field? Start there, work your way through the rest of the reasons women aren't in combat roles.
This isn't just dumb, it's politically motivated politically correct stupidity that's gonna get people killed in the name of "fairness".
If women can pass the same requirements as men, and go through the same training as if they were men, I would see no problem with allowing them to enter combat units.
lol dude you're a ****ing liberal and so is she. You don't count, but you both have something in common: you both think you know how I was raised in society. How about you stay out of it? If your 2 cents is needed you will be notified. Thanks.
But the woman only have 2/3's the strength of men.
Soooooooo funny... I forgot to laugh...
Women should not be allowed in combat units. Not because they cant handle it or are not physically able to. Its because there is a primal instinct for a man to protect women. I believe there would be issuse with the men making sound desitions when a woman was in a life and death situation.
It's not breed in men to protect women, that is all social conditioning.
But the woman only have 2/3's the strength of men.
I am not saying that you do not have that impulse, but you weren't born with it.
And I would need someone with combat experience to confirm this, but I'm assuming that on the battlefield a soldier would resort to their training, not primal instincts
How civil of you. :roll:
But the woman only have 2/3's the strength of men.
Have you seen some of the women that want to be in a combat role or live like a man? I wounldn't have a problem not protecting them and some don't even like men if you know what I mean.
You are looking at averages. One of the hands down strongest ordnanceman I knew in the was a woman, and another women in that job, while she could not lift quite as much, could lift enough and could keep doing it well past the point the guys where all needing to take a break. The military is not average.
But they are human. They don't suddenly morph into amazon women when they step on the battlefield. I will stick to my guns, I think it's bad for many reasons, biggest one being that no woman should have to shower or bathe in close quarters with any man not her husband. The issue of men protecting women first is a close second.
While at the same time I've met some men who COULDN'T meet the 'average male strength' capabilities and who didn't make it through boot-camp. . . why is that never harped on?
None of which addresses my comments.
I have an idea. How about we put women in segregated combat units, but where they have the same responsibilities as men and see what happens. That, I think, would once and for all end this debate.
Israel has already done this, and I'm pretty sure no one wants to **** with the Israel army.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?