• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

why have welfare, hmm?

ginwood

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
248
Reaction score
50
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.

You might try to live in coutries with dicators, seems you might like it there better. Happy trails!
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.

Good luck getting support for a new federal capital offense of being declared "worthless". Be very afraid that the last few threads that you have srarted may be added to the list of considerations for making that determination ;)
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.
so, that young child, born into poverty and incapable parent(s), thru no fault of his own, deserves to die
nobel peace prize is not in your future
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.

Aye - murder the poor and the weak. Heil Republicans!
 
believe me, the peace price isn't even on my radar. Why should a rational realist have to go live with a tyrant, hmm? methinks YOU are the (wannabe) tyrant. what's the matter? are YOU a tick that's living by sucking the blood of other people?
 
just GOTTA lie about what I said, right? Cause you can't STAND the idea of your hosts letting you die, tick? I said nothing about killing them. I said why don't they end their own worthless lives. that's NOT murder, look up the definitions, (since you obviously dont know the difference). "deserve" has nothing to do with it. Alignment with nature (and stopping the use of gov't guns to FORCE others to support ticks) that's the goal.
 
I said nothing about killing them. I said why don't they end their own worthless lives.

Would be nice, right?

But rather than living in some ridiculous fantasy world where the poor just up and kill themselves for the good of others you'd be better off looking at nations in Africa, Central and South America, and Asia where there are lots of poor and no, or insufficient, safety nets.

They don't just kill themselves for our convenience; instead they turn to piracy, and kidnapping for ransom, and highway robbery, and gang/cartel membership, and a bunch of other illegal and incredibly dangerous behavior that makes life completely miserable for folks who aren't poor.
 
believe me, the peace price isn't even on my radar. Why should a rational realist have to go live with a tyrant, hmm? methinks YOU are the (wannabe) tyrant. what's the matter? are YOU a tick that's living by sucking the blood of other people?

i will tell you what i am not
someone who is willing to advocate allowing children to die only because they had the misfortune to emerge from the wrong womb
 
Actually we all have a basic human obligation to help the needy. Even the Bible backs up that idea, by commanding us share our wealth with the least of our brethren.

Now, I understand that many do not beleive in the Bible or the existance of God, and I'm Ok with that. The problem lies, however, is when these people start substituting government for God. Then we must all bow down and give all our praise, honor, and money to the government.
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way.

I suspect that most muggers would agree with you

thug-life.jpg
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.

So people starving to death is merely natural? - When reliance on income-to-food is actually due to our economic platform?
 
nature set things up so that the inept die and get out of the way. That strengthens the species. Welfare does the opposite. Why do you WANT a so-called "life" that's worthless, hmm? If they haven't saved/invested enough to pay for their own care, and can't get charity, they need to get out of everybody else's way, man. Big shot of dope, a couple of plastic bags over your head, and it's over man. Go to sleep, never wake up.

This is the worst form of vulgar libertarianism. It shows a complete lack of understanding of poverty, corporate-capitalism, and statism, as if every human lives in a bubble.
 
Back
Top Bottom