• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who thinks the state made the case for a murder2 conviction?

Has the case been made for a murder conviction?

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
Do you want us to analise it?
 
Grim17 said:
Thank you for voting yes sharon, because you just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that your beliefs are ideological and have nothing to do with the facts.
Click to expand...

unlike you?
 
windowdressing said:
unlike you?
Click to expand...

Sorry, but my beliefs are based on the facts presented at the trial... If you disagree, then why don't you explain your position.

p.s. I noticed neither you or spanky have voted... Why is that?
 
Grim17 said:
Sorry, but my beliefs are based on the facts presented at the trial... If you disagree, then why don't you explain your position.
Click to expand...

have you considered not describing yourself as a conservative? it may make your claim more believable ...
 
windowdressing said:
have you considered not describing yourself as a conservative? it may make your claim more believable ...
Click to expand...

Say what?

I don't give a damn whether a person is liberal, conservative, socialist, communist or even a nazi... The facts are the facts, and if you have watched this trial from day 1 like I have, you would know that murder has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, or anything even resembling a reasonable doubt.
 
Grim17 said:
Sorry, but my beliefs are based on the facts presented at the trial... If you disagree, then why don't you explain your position.

p.s. I noticed neither you or spanky have voted... Why is that?
Click to expand...

I don't like public polls...they're for weiners and analizers.
 
From what I've seen on TV the state hasn't proven murder 2. Manslaughter would require rejecting the self defense argument and I don't see where they disproved that either.
 
Grim17 said:
Sorry, but my beliefs are based on the facts presented at the trial... If you disagree, then why don't you explain your position.

p.s. I noticed neither you or spanky have voted... Why is that?
Click to expand...

not enough info yet ... in fact, jurors are instructed not to form an opinion until ALL of the evidence is in ... it's the best way to be objective. But as Mr. or Ms. Objective, you already know that, don't you?
 
windowdressing said:
not enough info yet ... in fact, jurors are instructed not to form an opinion until ALL of the evidence is in ... it's the best way to be objective. But as Mr. or Ms. Objective, you already know that, don't you?
Click to expand...

The prosecution has rested... All the evidence against Zimmerman has already been presented.
 
Grim17 said:
Not for chicken****s and blowhards.
Click to expand...

I never understood why people make their polls public. If they're private you get more participation.

Must be a voyeur thingy.
 
Even with a clearly biased judge the states case is all circumstancial.
 
spanky said:
I never understood why people make their polls public. If they're private you get more participation.

Must be a voyeur thingy.
Click to expand...

Sure it will get more participation, that's because the flakes and agenda driven idiots can hide and don't have be held to their vote... Making the vote public means you will get people who's convictions and beliefs are substantive and real, and weeds out all the agenda driven BS'ers.
 
Grim17 said:
Sure it will get more participation, that's because the flakes and agenda driven idiots can hide and don't have be held to their vote... Making the vote public means you will get people who's convictions and beliefs are substantive and real, and weeds out all the agenda driven BS'ers.
Click to expand...

No, it just gives you a hate list.

I think you should tell people who vote in disagreement with you they will be "held to their vote"...whatever weird gestapo thing that means....
 
Last edited:
no the state has not made a convicting case for murder 2
 
spanky said:
No, it just gives you a hate list.

I think you should tell people who vote in disagreement with you they will be "held to their vote"...whatever weird gestapo thing that means....
Click to expand...

LMAO... No, it just means you will have to back up your vote, which explains why you haven't done so...

I'm done with your games... Buh bye,
 
Grim17 said:
The question is "Who thinks the state made the case for a murder2 conviction?"

The states case is over, so you are free to vote.
Click to expand...

the state is not done until the trial is over ... good night ...
 
Grim17 said:
LMAO... No, it just means you will have to back up your vote, which explains why you haven't done so...

I'm done with your games... Buh bye,
Click to expand...

Your poll is running 20 to 1 with the lone contrarian voice being Margot.

What does that tell you? I know what you're thinking though, that you're good enough, that you're smart enough and gosh darnit, people like you!
 
windowdressing said:
the state is not done until the trial is over ... good night ...
Click to expand...

Translation: I'm going to play dumb like spanky, because I know the state hasn't made the case for murder2, but I can't say that because my ideological beliefs are more important than being honest is.
 
Grim17 said:
Translation: I'm going to play dumb like spanky, because I know the state hasn't made the case for murder2, but I can't say that because my ideological beliefs are more important than being honest is.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily (although it is probable). There is a chance that the prosecution can still score points upon cross examination of defense witnesses, expecially if the defense (foolishly) offers up GZ.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Not necessarily (although it is probable). There is a chance that the prosecution can still score points upon cross examination of defense witnesses, expecially if the defense (foolishly) offers up GZ.
Click to expand...

Other than Z testifying, I really can't see them scoring any points that would change things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom