I am not sure if we are talking forum or in general. Are people in cyberspace more hateful than in the real world?
Doesn't matter. Though I will note that because of the anonymity afforded in an online setting often loosens inhibitions and as a result people are more real than they are face to face. So essentially it adds up to the same thing.
Interesting poll. I agree with the results. As usual, the left are hypocrites because they don't know how to look in the mirror.
Explain to me how I am a hypocrite. This should be entertaining...
When you accuse the right of trying to force their values on others and then turn around and force your values on them. Just one example: Kim Davis (a lifelong Democrat by the way), the clerk in Kentucky who didn't feel right issuing marriage licenses to gays that had her name on them due to her religious beliefs. The left felt better about putting her in jail, tar and feathering her, and rubbing her nose in it rather than the Democratic governor at the time simply taking her name off the licenses such as the current Republican governor has already done and she is still the clerk there and licenses are being issued to gays there without her name on them. Simple solution but the left would rather force their values on her because they didn't want her forcing her values on them.
When you accuse the right of trying to force their values on others and then turn around and force your values on them. Just one example: Kim Davis (a lifelong Democrat by the way), the clerk in Kentucky who didn't feel right issuing marriage licenses to gays that had her name on them due to her religious beliefs. The left felt better about putting her in jail, tar and feathering her, and rubbing her nose in it rather than the Democratic governor at the time simply taking her name off the licenses such as the current Republican governor has already done and she is still the clerk there and licenses are being issued to gays there without her name on them. Simple solution but the left would rather force their values on her because they didn't want her forcing her values on them.
I tend to agree with the first sentence and disagree with the second. Motive is everything. Not paying attention to motive is one of the biggest problems in modern politics.The entire question is a giant ad hominem. The motives of the sides don't affect the validity of their points.
I tend to agree . . . disagree with the second.
First off, you are ascribing to me positions I do not hold. Secondly, it is not hate filled to expect the government to serve the people.
She was "tarred and feathered"? Really?
There was no reason to take her name or title off the paperwork since she had agreed to do that job impartially. That means that her religious beliefs had no place being used in any capacity during her duties as the Clerk of that County. How would you have felt if she would have wanted her name removed from licenses issued to those in interracial marriages? How is that different? What if her claim was that it was part of her religious beliefs? Are you just going to allow that or challenge her religious belief as "not real"?
It is hard to say what is going on in people's minds.
I was thinking to myself "about even" until I thought about conservative places like the Middle East and Russia. That greatly swayed me.
This is an example of the difference between the two sides.
Don't get me started on the Hate Filled Canadians...