• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What they mean when they say women's rights..

tosca1 said:
That's been prophesied in the Bible!
It's called, apostasy.

That's a sign of nearing end times, you know.

Are you giving that as another addition to the thread................................... "END TIMES PROPHECIES: Are They Lining Up To Be Fulfilled?"




The Bible indicates that there will be a great apostasy during the end times. The “great apostasy” is mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
The KJV calls it the “falling away,” while the NIV and ESV call it “the rebellion.” And that’s what an apostasy is: a rebellion, an abandonment of the truth.

www.gotquestions.org

Will there be a great apostasy / falling away during the end times? | GotQuestions.org

Will there be a great apostasy / falling away during the end times? What is apostasy? Why does the great apostasy need to occur before the antichrist will be revealed?
www.gotquestions.org
Click to expand...

No, it's called shedding superstition.
 
tosca1 said:
That's been prophesied in the Bible!
It's called, apostasy.

That's a sign of nearing end times, you know.

Are you giving that as another addition to the thread................................... "END TIMES PROPHECIES: Are They Lining Up To Be Fulfilled?"




The Bible indicates that there will be a great apostasy during the end times. The “great apostasy” is mentioned in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
The KJV calls it the “falling away,” while the NIV and ESV call it “the rebellion.” And that’s what an apostasy is: a rebellion, an abandonment of the truth.

www.gotquestions.org

Will there be a great apostasy / falling away during the end times? | GotQuestions.org

Will there be a great apostasy / falling away during the end times? What is apostasy? Why does the great apostasy need to occur before the antichrist will be revealed?
www.gotquestions.org
Click to expand...

“End times”. *L*
 
noonereal said:
Truth hurts?
Click to expand...

Your post was truth free. The only ones who want preferential treatment are the flailing, failing right wing regressive nutter white males whose demise is now inevitable. And they will cry all the way to the end because they are worthless and weak.
 
devildavid said:
Your post was truth free. The only ones who want preferential treatment are the flailing, failing right wing regressive nutter white males whose demise is now inevitable. And they will cry all the way to the end because they are worthless and weak.
Click to expand...

They do too, yes. Seems that is modern American. The age of victimization.
Thing is, black had a valid grip. Women never did. White males who failed never did.
But that ship has sailed and blacks grips today are bullshit.

We need to truly treat all equal, period. But neither side what any part of that.
 
noonereal said:
They do too, yes. Seems that is modern American. The age of victimization.
Thing is, black had a valid grip. Women never did. White males who failed never did.
But that ship has sailed and blacks grips today are bullshit.

We need to truly treat all equal, period. But neither side what any part of that.
Click to expand...

Blacks and women want to be treated equally, and still are not. Women and blacks both had and have valid gripes to this day. It isn't over just because white males say it is.
 
devildavid said:
Blacks and women want to be treated equally, and still are not. Women and blacks both had and have valid gripes to this day. It isn't over just because white males say it is.
Click to expand...
No they are not. They always go first today. The white man goes last.
Women never had vault grips, blacks did.
Neither have valid gripes today.
 
noonereal said:
No they are not. They always go first today. The white man goes last.
Women never had vault grips, blacks did.
Neither have valid gripes today.
Click to expand...

Have you ever actually talked to a black person and LISTEN to what they have to say. Of course not! That would upset your whole applecart of what is basically a racist attitude which you seem to be quite proud of.
 
Questerr said:
Indeed and no human has a right to use the body of another person against that person’s will.
Click to expand...
It isn't against the mother's will. The woman invited the created human into her body for 9 months. It's called responsibility and being accountable for your actions. You don't want another person to come into your body, then don't get pregnant in the first place. At least you agree that the created human at conception is another separate person from the mother. :rolleyes:
 
Grasshopper121212 said:
It isn't against the mother's will. The woman invited the created human into her body for 9 months. It's called responsibility and being accountable for your actions. You don't want another person to come into your body, then don't get pregnant in the first place. At least you agree that the created human at conception is another separate person from the mother. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The fantasy world of Grasshopper where everything is perfect.

And, no a zygote is not a "person". The smallest example of a "person" is an advanced fetus. Before that, it is a zygote and then and embryo, and neither fit the definition of "person". Can you show otherwise?
 
devildavid said:
So you brought it up as if it has authority over American citizens. it does not.

Blacks were slaves and women couldn't vote because white men were prejudiced against them. They didn't believe the words they wrote. They were hypocrites. They formed the United States of Hypocrisy. Today's Republican's proudly assume that mantle. They are not the ones to look to for moral guidance.
Click to expand...
The liberal left is just insane. They think they can read the minds of people. And, that they are more moral and able to judge people. Yet, they kill unborn babies and think it's a good fun thing to do.
So, Jefferson writes clear as can be that "All men (mankind) are created equal. He didn't write all "white" men. You do know that white's also enslaved other whites as well. And, the first slave owner was black. And, it was black people in Africa that rounded up other blacks to sell to the slave traders. It's still going on today. So, I demand reparations from black and liberal Democrats who were the slave trader racists of that time period. Based on what Jefferson wrote, I'd say he wanted to end slavery and revolting from Great Britain was the beginning of this. The Founding Fathers laid the ground work for the end of slavery and giving women the right to vote. Took a while but they started it with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But, the self-righteous will never understand that time period and judge them unrighteously based on today's morals and ways to do things. Yet, at the same time, revert back to slavery by calling all white people racist. You have no moral standing above Jefferson.
 
Grasshopper121212 said:
All men (mankind) are created equal.
Click to expand...

He didn't say "all mankind". That is YOUR interpretation so that you can include a one-celled organism called a zygote. He said "men", by which he obviously meant all humans ONCE THEY ARE BORN. To parse it in any other manner is getting very close to being dishonest.
 
Grasshopper121212 said:
It isn't against the mother's will. The woman invited the created human into her body for 9 months. It's called responsibility and being accountable for your actions. You don't want another person to come into your body, then don't get pregnant in the first place. At least you agree that the created human at conception is another separate person from the mother. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Unless you are arguing women on get pregnant through conscious acthey have control over, your claim is false.

The chances of getting pregnant from any single act of intercourse are so minuscule that engaging in it cannot be seen as consenting to get pregnant.
 
Grasshopper121212 said:
The liberal left is just insane. They think they can read the minds of people. And, that they are more moral and able to judge people. Yet, they kill unborn babies and think it's a good fun thing to do.
So, Jefferson writes clear as can be that "All men (mankind) are created equal. He didn't write all "white" men. You do know that white's also enslaved other whites as well. And, the first slave owner was black. And, it was black people in Africa that rounded up other blacks to sell to the slave traders. It's still going on today. So, I demand reparations from black and liberal Democrats who were the slave trader racists of that time period. Based on what Jefferson wrote, I'd say he wanted to end slavery and revolting from Great Britain was the beginning of this. The Founding Fathers laid the ground work for the end of slavery and giving women the right to vote. Took a while but they started it with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But, the self-righteous will never understand that time period and judge them unrighteously based on today's morals and ways to do things. Yet, at the same time, revert back to slavery by calling all white people racist. You have no moral standing above Jefferson.
Click to expand...

No Whites in America were ever chattel slaves the way Black people were and to insinuate that was the case is either extreme ignorance or deliberate lying on your part.

There were no “Liberal Democrat” slave traders. Democrats were the Conservative party.
 
watsup said:
Have you ever actually talked to a black person and LISTEN to what they have to say. Of course not! That would upset your whole applecart of what is basically a racist attitude which you seem to be quite proud of.
Click to expand...
So if I don't agree with you I am racist and don't even talk to blacks.

If I don't agree with angry women I am misogynist and have never spoken to a women.

And as I don't agree with failed white trash I am a ? And I have never spoken to a hillbilly.

Intestesing.

You know, it seems to me, you simply hate people that call our the victimization crap from all groups.

Peace
 
watsup said:
He didn't say "all mankind". That is YOUR interpretation so that you can include a one-celled organism called a zygote. He said "men", by which he obviously meant all humans ONCE THEY ARE BORN. To parse it in any other manner is getting very close to being dishonest.
Click to expand...
That cell has either the DNA of a man or woman. So, all mankind is the true understanding of all "men." Also, it is well understood in the world of literature as well. Dang, I keep having to explain basic truths that are self evident to Democrats, liberals and communists. However, I notice that more and more are coming to grips with the fact the created being is a separate individual person. Now, if I can get through to some thick minds that the baby and mother have equal rights to life. It's self evident that Democrats, liberals and communists don't believe in equal rights unless it helps them politically and to destroy the United States of America.
 
Questerr said:
Unless you are arguing women get pregnant through conscious acts they have control over, your claim is false.

The chances of getting pregnant from any single act of intercourse are so minuscule that engaging in it cannot be seen as consenting to get pregnant.
Click to expand...
While you are throwing the baby out with the bath water, you might as well throw out science with the water too.
 
Grasshopper121212 said:
While you are throwing the baby out with the bath water, you might as well throw out science with the water too.
Click to expand...

Science backs me up. The chances of getting pregnant from any single act of intercourse, especially if any form of birth control is used, is so minuscule that having sex cannot be considered consent to getting pregnant unless pregnancy was the express goal of the participants.
 
Questerr said:
Unless you are arguing women on get pregnant through conscious acthey have control over, your claim is false.

The chances of getting pregnant from any single act of intercourse are so minuscule that engaging in it cannot be seen as consenting to get pregnant.
Click to expand...
While you are throwing the baby out with the bath water, you might as well throw out science with the water too.
Of course women consciously have sex which there is a risk of pregnancy. That's pretty simple to understand. And, that idea that you can't get pregnant with having just one orgasm from the man is really stupid. That's like, "you can't get pregnant on the first time" stupid. Again, doesn't matter. If the woman has sexual intercourse she takes the risk on of getting pregnant. Then, it's accountability and responsibility the woman takes on to have the baby. She has it, great. She doesn't, murder.
 
Questerr said:
Science backs me up. The chances of getting pregnant from any single act of intercourse, especially if any form of birth control is used, is so minuscule that having sex cannot be considered consent to getting pregnant unless pregnancy was the express goal of the participants.
Click to expand...
Science doesn't back you up. Spouting off garbage with no proof of references is typical in this forum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom